HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: Salute to NASCAR Fans Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 5 of 8   of  155 replies
Sprinter 79
MyWebsite
November 26, 2011 at 01:11:56 AM
Joined: 12/05/2010
Posts: 840
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: BIGFISH on November 25 2011 at 11:07:21 PM

Your position of simply being contrary has been noted. If you would like to elaborate in regards to what was actualy shown by Stuart, please feel free to do so. I'd be entertained by your tap dance.

There is no question that Fox edited that piece to misrepresent what our president said about tax's, no matter who brought it to light; and though I use a variety of sources for my information, Fox news is not one of them because of their blatant dishonesty.

"Remember that just because you hold a certain belief, does not mean that everyone else holds the mirror opposite belief. I think if you stop and look at what the "typical liberal" believes in, it's wildly different from the caricature created by right wing media".



Firstly, Stuart is a comedian! Not to say that he is misinformed, or twisting the truth, just that he makes his living trying to be funny. I never said that Fox does not spin, but for that matter there are many Liberal & progressive programs that do the same. Which brings me back to my original point, which is obviously blowing well over your head here. And you sure have a HUGE bug in your undies over FOX don't you? I do not intend to justify my beliefs to anyone here. Just the facts!!!! The fact that whatever the fellow in the White House is doing at this moment is not helping anyone! So don't get your hopes up, there will be NO tap dancing at this particular time. I have no need to!
Never hit stationary objects!

BIGFISH
MyWebsite
November 26, 2011 at 01:44:15 AM
Joined: 01/02/2007
Posts: 5252
Reply

I have no idea what you think you have debunked, or what you think my talking points are. I've given you my own personal thoughts from observing how the reds have done everything in there power to make Obama look bad to the detriment of us all.....This is my quote, no talking points and I stand by it... "I'll vote for him again, and with a little luck maybe the reds will actually help pass some bills to get this show on the road again, instead of voting down every job creating bill that comes before them; even if it originally was their own idea! The agenda of the reds is not to create jobs or improve the economy, it's to make Obama look as bad as possible. Their whole agenda has been to crush everything within their power that might help this administration do it's job, and to hell with helping us. It's borderline treason in my opinion"


Half the lies they tell about me aren't true. 

Sprinter 79
MyWebsite
November 26, 2011 at 02:01:34 AM
Joined: 12/05/2010
Posts: 840
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: BIGFISH on November 26 2011 at 01:44:15 AM

I have no idea what you think you have debunked, or what you think my talking points are. I've given you my own personal thoughts from observing how the reds have done everything in there power to make Obama look bad to the detriment of us all.....This is my quote, no talking points and I stand by it... "I'll vote for him again, and with a little luck maybe the reds will actually help pass some bills to get this show on the road again, instead of voting down every job creating bill that comes before them; even if it originally was their own idea! The agenda of the reds is not to create jobs or improve the economy, it's to make Obama look as bad as possible. Their whole agenda has been to crush everything within their power that might help this administration do it's job, and to hell with helping us. It's borderline treason in my opinion"



I was not making an effort to debunk anything. And this is not an effort to debunk anything either, but fact of the matter is that both the House and the Senate were controlled by the Democrats for two years. And they accomplished nothing. It did not take the Republicans trying to slow down the process, the Democrats had their heads wedged firmly where the sun doesn't shine. They could have done ANYTHING. They had the required votes. See, I live in the Chicagoland area and we are governed solely by the Democrats, and we can not get anything done to save our souls. And that is not to say that the Republican's could do any better. We have had our fair share of looser Republicans here as well. But for the past roughly 10 years it has been Democratic. And these lunatics can't figure out a damn thing. We are broke, directionless, and in real trouble. Which is the way that the federal government is headed as well. I will not be voting for Obama, but that does not mean that I will vote for a Republican. I am waiting for someone with some real experience to step up and run for office. At least someone who will cut back on spending and attempt to right the ship. In the event that folks have not noticed, "We are in trouble here people!"
Never hit stationary objects!


Hawker
November 26, 2011 at 03:15:26 AM
Joined: 11/23/2004
Posts: 2809
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: watkinsgrady on November 25 2011 at 06:37:40 PM

For the first two years of this presidency the dems controlled the senate, the house and the white house they could have done and did do everything they wanted to do and where are we now? $15 trillion in debt, thats $100,000 for every tax payer and going higher, why would we want to keep on this stupid course? There is no one that can continue to spend more than they take in and not expect to go broke so the dems answer is raise taxes on the rich, the problem is that if you raised taxes on people that make over a million a year to 100% you would only have enough money for three months. The fix is to bite the bullet and get rid of some of the rite offs and lower spending, until then it is all a mute point no matter who is running this monster we call our government. You say "Congress came right out and told America" thats not quite true the dems still control half of that body the senate and even some of the dems in the senate do not agree with the way this country is headed. So I would say that telling the dems NO is in fact putting this country on the right track.

Grady



Do you SERIOUSLY think that 8 years of more spending than Clinton and fighting TWO wars* on money borrowed from Japan and China didn't have an "impact" on what we see today? You talk like the economy could be repaired in two years when we'll be lucky to be back at 2007 level in 2017. It's time to pay the piper. BTW...Do you not remember that Obama extended the Bush tax cuts at the urging of the Republicans preaching that "the jobs would come".....WELL?????
Member of this message board since 1997

sprintcarfanatic
November 26, 2011 at 09:05:46 AM
Joined: 11/30/2004
Posts: 1065
Reply

They need to get the average joe workin, I seen this comin along time ago. Didn't vote for along time & now that I do what the hell changed, They talk good shit, Some people bite & for a 2nd & 3rd time even. This is the mentality of our Government, If you can't dazzle them with brilliance baffle them with bullshit. I feel sorry for peoples kids & grandkids, What is in this for them. I don't have to worry about that because the name stops with me. I bust on union people & I know some, They are great if ya get that union job but what about the little people that have 10 or 11 dollar an hr job or less. The owner of the place has to charge more for your 20 to 22 dollars an hr + a lttle more for inventory, etc. When ya get into teachers, city, state & federal government it is totaly on the taxpayer & if ya don't have them then eventually you are not going to have teachers, firemen & police because the money is not there for them but yet they do not see this. They had firemen coming door to door here & I didn't see them, I would have asked them why are they not lobbying for the average joe instead of looking out for yourselves, If the average joe was working & paying taxes this deal would be a non issue. Get our jobs back in the USA. Republicans & Demorcrats both need to stop doing stupid shit.



Mr Cantina
November 26, 2011 at 01:41:49 PM
Joined: 10/01/2010
Posts: 208
Reply
This message was edited on November 26, 2011 at 01:44:51 PM by Mr Cantina
Reply to:
Posted By: BIGFISH on November 26 2011 at 01:44:15 AM

I have no idea what you think you have debunked, or what you think my talking points are. I've given you my own personal thoughts from observing how the reds have done everything in there power to make Obama look bad to the detriment of us all.....This is my quote, no talking points and I stand by it... "I'll vote for him again, and with a little luck maybe the reds will actually help pass some bills to get this show on the road again, instead of voting down every job creating bill that comes before them; even if it originally was their own idea! The agenda of the reds is not to create jobs or improve the economy, it's to make Obama look as bad as possible. Their whole agenda has been to crush everything within their power that might help this administration do it's job, and to hell with helping us. It's borderline treason in my opinion"



~ ~ ~ Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ But ``` OBAMA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ "I'll vote for him again" ~ ~ ~ WHAT, OMG, !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

~ ~ ~ I have my comment & OPINION on this, ~ ~ ~ but I'll keep it to myself, I don't want to start world war three, ~ ~ ~

```360```


.... I stand for 
justice, justice for ALL ~ ~ ~ 360... 

~ ~ ~ You Can't Scam A Scammer ! ! ! 


watkinsgrady
November 26, 2011 at 07:44:50 PM
Joined: 12/05/2004
Posts: 856
Reply
This message was edited on November 26, 2011 at 07:47:23 PM by watkinsgrady
Reply to:
Posted By: Hawker on November 26 2011 at 03:15:26 AM
Do you SERIOUSLY think that 8 years of more spending than Clinton and fighting TWO wars* on money borrowed from Japan and China didn't have an "impact" on what we see today? You talk like the economy could be repaired in two years when we'll be lucky to be back at 2007 level in 2017. It's time to pay the piper. BTW...Do you not remember that Obama extended the Bush tax cuts at the urging of the Republicans preaching that "the jobs would come".....WELL?????


Maybe I didn't say it properly, it doesn't make a damn bit of difference if it is a repub or a dem if they don't change the way this country is being run it won't matter, you can not continue to spend more than you make without serious consequences. It was in the day that people went to congress to serve the people but they have made it now that they go there to get rich and it has to change, dem or repub, the law they passed that exempts all of them from insider trading should show all of America what we are dealing with, crooks. You can think that all the woderful dems are on your side if you want to,but I would recomend putting a little bit of thought to it.

Grady


. 

PowerSlave
MyWebsite
November 26, 2011 at 07:57:33 PM
Joined: 12/12/2004
Posts: 1088
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: watkinsgrady on November 26 2011 at 07:44:50 PM

Maybe I didn't say it properly, it doesn't make a damn bit of difference if it is a repub or a dem if they don't change the way this country is being run it won't matter, you can not continue to spend more than you make without serious consequences. It was in the day that people went to congress to serve the people but they have made it now that they go there to get rich and it has to change, dem or repub, the law they passed that exempts all of them from insider trading should show all of America what we are dealing with, crooks. You can think that all the woderful dems are on your side if you want to,but I would recomend putting a little bit of thought to it.

Grady



Absolutely. I read a report a few weeks ago that claimed that the average congress critter's portfolio has increased by 25% since 2008. They don't live like the rest of us and never will. They've assumed too much power and it needs to be taken from them.

Libertarians have been screaming this from the mountain tops for a very long time now. It's about time that every body else wakes up and sees it as well.


...

BIGFISH
MyWebsite
November 26, 2011 at 08:43:43 PM
Joined: 01/02/2007
Posts: 5252
Reply
This message was edited on November 26, 2011 at 08:47:23 PM by BIGFISH

This kid has it made, I work for the reds! Whoops, I mean I basically work for the red state of AZ... Even though I only work in facilities at a large community college, I reap all the benefits that our long time (ask Grady) red run state government has put in place for themselves. Lets see, insurance? Not a problem, and since I'm single I get the top of the line in all category's for free, with just a measly $300 deductible, and low co-payments. Retirement? Hell yes, and I was vested after only 5 years! Lets see, with pay I get a week off for spring break just like the students, and two weeks for Christmas too, and 3 days to eat a Turkey; plus numerous other "holidays". Oh, and three weeks vacation just in case that's not enough time off at the taxpayers expense. Unions! Who in the hell needs a union when you work for a red run state that takes care of themselves, and to hell with the peons.

I removed my tool-belt at around 50 (millwright type work for Borden's at the end) because I was tired of fixing crap for large corporations that have made a bundle off it's cheap labor , yes cheap! I decided to do something worth while for a change, so I worked with Vets that had head injuries, schizophrenics, people with alzheimer's, dementia, stoke victims and more. I also worked with men out of our state mental "hospital" that were so messed up after years and years of abuse they couldn't even put them in group homes. They are housed in what's called a intermediate care facilitie. I took them out into the general population on a one on one basis five days a week, hoping no one would get hurt, or worse..LOL At the place I worked the last 4 years and before I went to work for the college, I worked every holiday, and was lucky to get my one week off. I'd still be doing that kind of work today, but you just can't make a living wage working in the trenches, and who really gives a shit about them anyway, right? Some of you sit up on your high horse and make judgments about why people haven't pulled themselves up by their boot straps and "take a bath, and get a job" as Newt said, but it's not that easy. When I was a kid in Torrance my dad bought a cheap house with a GI loan in the track homes that were being built after the war, just like a lot of Vets did. A lot of the men out of that same group went to school for a spit on the GI bill too. We prospered after the war in the 50's and 60's because there were opportunities, and we worked hard for that elusive American dream because it was attainable then. Higher education was something that the average person could get without acquiring a huge debt, and a education is what many strived for as well, because it to was part of the mythical "American dream". It all was part of what we as Americans thought we were as a country, with opportunity for us all. Where are those opportunity's today?

To bad we didn't privatize Social Security as Bush wanted, and pushed hard for in his second term. We wouldn't have to worry about it any longer now would we, because it would be gone!.. AH!, but they did get a good part of the pensions of hard working people that opened a 401K with that money, didn't they?

If anyone doesn't think we haven't been screwed by corporations, and the military industrial complex, as well as the powers that be, you just haven't been paying attention, and why anyone would go against those who choose to demonstrate against the inequity's created by their greed is beyond me.


Half the lies they tell about me aren't true. 


buzz rightrear
November 26, 2011 at 09:00:54 PM
Joined: 09/12/2008
Posts: 2511
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Hawker on November 26 2011 at 03:15:26 AM
Do you SERIOUSLY think that 8 years of more spending than Clinton and fighting TWO wars* on money borrowed from Japan and China didn't have an "impact" on what we see today? You talk like the economy could be repaired in two years when we'll be lucky to be back at 2007 level in 2017. It's time to pay the piper. BTW...Do you not remember that Obama extended the Bush tax cuts at the urging of the Republicans preaching that "the jobs would come".....WELL?????


if spending and wars and tax cuts are your problem let me remind you that obama has spent as much or more in 3 years as bush did in 8. he has also continued the same wars and got us involved in others. he has also pushed for the payroll deduction tax cuts that have resulted in less revenue. as far as the jobs coming, i doubt that will happen until this government can stop making business out to be the bad guy. the president has been waging war on the business community and they have no sense of security as long as he is in charge. he is making enemies of the very people he is trying to look to for help and it is starting to show as contributions to him by them are plummeting. he thinks he can create a new business community over night in the "green" sector that will be more favorable to him. the thing is, it isn't going to happen. the public is getting wise to his funneling money to "green" causes at their expense. ethanol as a viable alternative to gasoline is a joke. we in the racing community know you get half the fuel mileage on ethanol or methanol and with the government continuing to mandate more fuel mileage that doesn't make sense. also engines don't perform well in cold or wet conditions with ethanol and you can't store it in the ground or in your tank long because it conducts moisture.

the electric cars are a joke as well as most of the fuel to get the electricity comes from coal and natural gas. besides, isn't our national electric grid barely able to handle the use we are putting on it now? what will happen when a bunch of cars get plugged in? the chevy volt was supposed to save america. with its battery packs made in korea, its transmission made in japan, its gas engine made in austria and its electric motors made in mexico i wonder who it is really saving. well i doubt it is saving anyone because no one is buying it. also recent tests show that it is the environmentally friendly equivalent to the ford pinto as the battery has shown to catch fire in collisions.

i got a little off track, but i had a point to pass on. i wanted to say if spending and wars and tax cuts bother you, they should bother you no matter who does them.

by the way i hope you have a great holiday season and you make sure to give a shout when you are out this way.


to indy and beyond!!

budz76
MyWebsite
November 27, 2011 at 09:20:23 AM
Joined: 12/03/2005
Posts: 281
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: BIGFISH on November 25 2011 at 02:54:38 PM

Found this>>>> "There likely would be no NASCAR without the Obama “bailout” of GM and Chrysler…you can’t run races with just one manufacturer. All the down-stream suppliers and auto malls and dealers would have sunk faster than iron-turds if Obama hadn’t stood up and saved these companies..who have now recovered, AND paid back their loans".

Seems kind of odd this was ignored by my right winged friends, but typical.




Are you really serious? Barak saved NASCAR?? Bigfish, ask yourself WHY Obama bailed out GM & Chrysler?? Was it to save GM & Chrysler or was it pandering to the union voters? Remember, I believe that part of the "reoraginzation" of both companies was to add more union voice to the board of directors and give the "workers" more say in how GM & Chrysler do business. Giving the union more say in how ANY company is managed is a death wish. I predict that one or both of these companies will be bought out, go bankrupt or be nationalized within 10 years.



BIGFISH
MyWebsite
November 27, 2011 at 12:27:29 PM
Joined: 01/02/2007
Posts: 5252
Reply
This message was edited on November 27, 2011 at 12:51:43 PM by BIGFISH
Reply to:
Posted By: budz76 on November 27 2011 at 09:20:23 AM

Are you really serious? Barak saved NASCAR?? Bigfish, ask yourself WHY Obama bailed out GM & Chrysler?? Was it to save GM & Chrysler or was it pandering to the union voters? Remember, I believe that part of the "reoraginzation" of both companies was to add more union voice to the board of directors and give the "workers" more say in how GM & Chrysler do business. Giving the union more say in how ANY company is managed is a death wish. I predict that one or both of these companies will be bought out, go bankrupt or be nationalized within 10 years.



Obama bailed out GM and Chrysler because they needed help and fast. The Dem's have always had union support, and you should know that. The bottom line is that it worked, and as far as how it would have effected NASCAR if they had had failed is debatable, and why I'd put up that quote I'd found. It is a provocative thought, is it not?... Looking for them to fail within ten years is a nice idea, if you're unamerican.

In case you don't remember, or care to, Bush gave them money without much thought at all.

December 19, 2008: 2:48 PM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush announced a rescue plan for General Motors and Chrysler LLC Friday morning that will make $13.4 billion in federal loans available almost immediately.

BUSH>>>"Government has a responsibility to safeguard the broader health and stability of our economy," he said. "If we were to allow the free market to take its course now, it would almost certainly lead to disorderly bankruptcy and liquidation for the automakers."

"In the midst of a financial crisis and a recession, allowing the U.S. auto industry to collapse is not a responsible course of action," Bush added.".....http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/19/news/companies/auto_crisis/index.htm


Half the lies they tell about me aren't true. 


buzz rightrear
November 27, 2011 at 01:09:02 PM
Joined: 09/12/2008
Posts: 2511
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: BIGFISH on November 27 2011 at 12:27:29 PM

Obama bailed out GM and Chrysler because they needed help and fast. The Dem's have always had union support, and you should know that. The bottom line is that it worked, and as far as how it would have effected NASCAR if they had had failed is debatable, and why I'd put up that quote I'd found. It is a provocative thought, is it not?... Looking for them to fail within ten years is a nice idea, if you're unamerican.

In case you don't remember, or care to, Bush gave them money without much thought at all.

December 19, 2008: 2:48 PM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush announced a rescue plan for General Motors and Chrysler LLC Friday morning that will make $13.4 billion in federal loans available almost immediately.

BUSH>>>"Government has a responsibility to safeguard the broader health and stability of our economy," he said. "If we were to allow the free market to take its course now, it would almost certainly lead to disorderly bankruptcy and liquidation for the automakers."

"In the midst of a financial crisis and a recession, allowing the U.S. auto industry to collapse is not a responsible course of action," Bush added.".....http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/19/news/companies/auto_crisis/index.htm



bush might have made loans available, but he didn't have anything to do with how the "restructuring" was done. bush was not the one who screwed secured bond holders out of their money or allowed the unions to be the favored party in the deal. the companies in effect went through government assisted BK. most economists and other financial experts say they would have been better off to go through normal BK. the thing that was putting the most financial burden on them was union retirement and benefit packages. how do you end up giving more control to the people who are dragging you down? your comment that it worked is yet to be seen. GM keeps saying they have paid back their loan. that may be true in a sense. the thing is, they borrowed from the tax payers to pay the loan back. that is kind of like me borrowing money from you and you give it to me from one account, then i borrow money from you and you give it to me from another account, and i give it back to you to put in the first account. i still owe you money.


to indy and beyond!!

Sprinter 79
MyWebsite
November 27, 2011 at 02:51:59 PM
Joined: 12/05/2010
Posts: 840
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: buzz rightrear on November 27 2011 at 01:09:02 PM

bush might have made loans available, but he didn't have anything to do with how the "restructuring" was done. bush was not the one who screwed secured bond holders out of their money or allowed the unions to be the favored party in the deal. the companies in effect went through government assisted BK. most economists and other financial experts say they would have been better off to go through normal BK. the thing that was putting the most financial burden on them was union retirement and benefit packages. how do you end up giving more control to the people who are dragging you down? your comment that it worked is yet to be seen. GM keeps saying they have paid back their loan. that may be true in a sense. the thing is, they borrowed from the tax payers to pay the loan back. that is kind of like me borrowing money from you and you give it to me from one account, then i borrow money from you and you give it to me from another account, and i give it back to you to put in the first account. i still owe you money.



Besides, the government wrote off something in the neighborhood 14 billion that we will never see from GM. And they did the same for Chrysler, but I do not remember the amount, but it was nowhere near as high a figure. GM is heading down that ill gotten path again, it will only be a matter of time. I just hope that the next time around they are allowed to fail. They made their bed, let them lay in it. That is why I will only buy Fords from now on. Until Honda or Toyota are making trucks that are strong enough to do what I need them to do. FORD, the ONLY American automobile manufacturer that DID NOT screw the American People!!!!
Never hit stationary objects!

BIGFISH
MyWebsite
November 27, 2011 at 03:53:44 PM
Joined: 01/02/2007
Posts: 5252
Reply

Good deal, buy a Ford and then trade it for a real car.Smile

You'll love this, and as I understand it, it's one of your big hopes for our future.

Ford received $5.9 Billion in loans from the Department Of Energy and I want to stress that this is not a "Bailout" this program was initiated in 2007 under the Bush administration and the appropriations were made in 2008 before the industry meltdown.

This money will be used to further develop more fuel efficient cars, including Battery Electric and Plug In Hybrids.

So what do you think, should Bush have been giving that kind of money to Ford knowing,(or didn't he) the trouble our economy was in and with the debt was that he's already ran up. Do you think Ford was accountable for it?

Ford, BMW, Toyota Took Secret Government Money..... This here is a very interesting read.http://jalopnik.com/5704575/ford-bmw-toyota-took-secret-government-money


Half the lies they tell about me aren't true. 


revjimk
November 27, 2011 at 04:31:04 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7634
Reply

Want to save the government some money? Very few brave "extremists" from either party have mentioned how much we could save by not invading & occupying all these countries. Why do we need bases in Europe, Japan, even CUBA??!!??

Keep up the good fight, Bigfish.... I'm kind of like you, gave up welding when I hit 50, now a sub teacher. Only thing is I don't get all those benefits like you. Subs are essentially day laborers, no insurance, can't even get UE in the summer... I'm broke by Labor Day every year



Sprinter 79
MyWebsite
November 27, 2011 at 04:33:41 PM
Joined: 12/05/2010
Posts: 840
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: BIGFISH on November 27 2011 at 03:53:44 PM

Good deal, buy a Ford and then trade it for a real car.Smile

You'll love this, and as I understand it, it's one of your big hopes for our future.

Ford received $5.9 Billion in loans from the Department Of Energy and I want to stress that this is not a "Bailout" this program was initiated in 2007 under the Bush administration and the appropriations were made in 2008 before the industry meltdown.

This money will be used to further develop more fuel efficient cars, including Battery Electric and Plug In Hybrids.

So what do you think, should Bush have been giving that kind of money to Ford knowing,(or didn't he) the trouble our economy was in and with the debt was that he's already ran up. Do you think Ford was accountable for it?

Ford, BMW, Toyota Took Secret Government Money..... This here is a very interesting read.http://jalopnik.com/5704575/ford-bmw-toyota-took-secret-government-money



If that is true then I guess that all American auto makers are crap. Guess I will be looking at foreign cars only, thanks for the heads up! (sarcams) Hey, were they loans to Ford, or were they give aways? Oh, you already said, they were loans. When you get a figure regarding how much Ford actually PAID BACK, perhaps I will lend some weight to your argument. And who was the first company to admit to declining numbers????? Ford. And who bashed Ford in their advertisements until they had to eat crow for being worse off?????? GM. Sorry there, but the government has been giving away money to auto manufacturers for a while in an effort to get CLEAN cars. The government has been involved in the push for Green cars for a while. If Ford got an incentive to build Green cars to fit into the push to force american buyers to drive them, so be it. The only company to really have any success what so ever in the Green car market so far has been Toyota. So I ask you, Mr. AMERICA Rules, wouldn't you want your government involved in trying to compete with foreign auto makers? Lord knows that he Big 3 are helpless otherwise. You can not throw a figure out there that is indicative of the actions of the federal government to force it's people to as the government pleases and expect me to be surprised. GM & Chrysler SUCK, and should have gone belly up. That is how the system is supposed to work. Maybe Ford did get a kick back, but so did GM and chrysler Before the bail out. Hell, Chrysler has been a thorn in the side of tax payers for decades!!!! So it is what it is. Like I said, once Toyota and or Honda are making a truck that is capable of doing what I need them to do, I will not buy American. But since I am in a position to have to, I will choose the lesser of the two evils. My Fords have been flawless in operation.
Never hit stationary objects!

revjimk
November 27, 2011 at 04:33:50 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7634
Reply

" pandering to the union voters?" Isn't that also called "saving jobs"?




revjimk
November 27, 2011 at 04:39:05 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7634
Reply

"the electric cars are a joke as well as most of the fuel to get the electricity comes from coal and natural gas" Can't argue with that one...... maybe hybrids would help if they were affordable. I like more research on cellulose based ethanol, uses waste products, not potential food crops which drives up worldwide food prices.

Whats methanol made from?



Sprinter 79
MyWebsite
November 27, 2011 at 04:42:27 PM
Joined: 12/05/2010
Posts: 840
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: revjimk on November 27 2011 at 04:33:50 PM

" pandering to the union voters?" Isn't that also called "saving jobs"?



Not necessarily. The UAW has been a problem for automakers for a while. Pandering to the unions in the automotive arena is costing the taxpayers more than the tax payers deserve to be paying. With the unions ripping off the auto makers they are in effect pushing the makers to bankruptcy. The automotive industry has been the long and short of my life. It is not a pretty picture out there. The auto industry is a perfect example of American greed running amuck. We need to allow them to fail. The CEO's need to loose their jobs and the companies need to restructure themselves to become more competitive in todays market. And if they can not, they need to fail. Remember when Saturn went under and Roger Penske was going to buy them? He bailed because he could not find another company to run the show outside of GM, who wanted to run the business from their plants. Roger is a smart business man. He ran from any deal that would have connected him to GM. That should have been a sign to everyone.
Never hit stationary objects!



Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy