HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: The disappearing of Reutzel Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 3 of 4   of  60 replies
linbob
August 26, 2021 at 02:58:07 PM
Joined: 03/12/2011
Posts: 1658
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: HoldenCaulfield on August 25 2021 at 07:02:10 PM

Again I think everyone is making too big of a deal about the whole thing. He will serve his suspension and get another ride. Life goes on and it will eventually be mostly forgotten.



Roth has fired every driver he ever has had.  Aaron just got fired 2 months sooner than he would have.



linbob
August 26, 2021 at 03:32:03 PM
Joined: 03/12/2011
Posts: 1658
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: egras on August 25 2021 at 12:10:28 PM

Kind of agree.  But, there are multiple layers and degrees of cheating.

For example: 

1. David Gravel was caught "cheating" last month after he weighed in 6 lbs. under weight.  The rule is the car and the driver must weight 1400 lbs. at the end of the race.  Simple penalty with loss of points/purse, end of story.  No malicious intent, was simply gambling on fuel and weight and lost the gamble.  No reason for suspension.

2. A guy who reads the rule book from front to back and then says "if it's not in the book, it can't get me a penalty" will try anything on a car that there isn't yet a rule about.  Officials see it, outlaw it, and it's not done again.  Examples Sammy Swindell with his independent suspension and Ray Evernham on about every car he built at Hendrick Motorsports.  Sammy and Ray weren't cheating, they just found loopholes in the rules and pushed those loopholes until the rule was re-written.  No cause for suspension here either.  

3.  A guy who attempts to pass a chassis in pre-race inspection at Knoxville in June.  Chassis fails inspection due to thinner than allowed tubing.  At this point, this is not a huge deal.  Chassis is rejected, and driver competes in events using a previously inspected/ok'd chassis.  No reason for suspension.

4.  The guy from example 3 takes that previously rejected chassis out of storage, paints it to hide its true identity, carefully removes a sticker from another accepted chassis, and knowingly places sticker on said rejected chassis-------this is grounds for suspension. 

 

Cheating is not cheating.  There are many different levels.  

 



I think car and driver must weigh 1425 this year.  Gravel was not cheating.  Crew and driver know they have to weigh in at end of race.  You have no idea when you go out on track how many yellow flags you will have that burns up feul.  You go out with new tires and come in with worn to bald tirs.  These tires lost weight.  If a driver does not hydrate enough he will lose several pounds of weight.  I have on a hot day lost 3-4 pounds just setting on a chair and watching the crew work.  Gravel did not cheat, crew just needed 1 more gallon of fuel in tank.



stab-n-steer
August 26, 2021 at 03:43:36 PM
Joined: 08/05/2010
Posts: 89
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: linbob on August 26 2021 at 02:58:07 PM

Roth has fired every driver he ever has had.  Aaron just got fired 2 months sooner than he would have.



Ding ding we have a winner, Roth is a big pussbag it should have been a match made in heaven!!!




Murphy
August 26, 2021 at 03:45:59 PM
Joined: 05/26/2005
Posts: 3328
Reply

Isn't there only one race left in the season at Knoxville?



Hoosier Papa
August 26, 2021 at 05:19:48 PM
Joined: 08/09/2021
Posts: 11
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Rocket7200 on August 26 2021 at 11:06:50 AM

He will finish the year for RSR and then start next year before burning himself out of that ride as well. It's how he operates, history always repeats itself 



Burning himself out?  You mean like he did with Baughman?  

Haters always gonna hate.



egras
August 26, 2021 at 07:06:01 PM
Joined: 08/16/2009
Posts: 3982
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: linbob on August 26 2021 at 03:32:03 PM

I think car and driver must weigh 1425 this year.  Gravel was not cheating.  Crew and driver know they have to weigh in at end of race.  You have no idea when you go out on track how many yellow flags you will have that burns up feul.  You go out with new tires and come in with worn to bald tirs.  These tires lost weight.  If a driver does not hydrate enough he will lose several pounds of weight.  I have on a hot day lost 3-4 pounds just setting on a chair and watching the crew work.  Gravel did not cheat, crew just needed 1 more gallon of fuel in tank.



I'm a Gravel fan.  I was trying to make a point-------------some were saying breaking the rules is breaking the rules.  It was an example of how breaking the rules is not always at the same level.  I know Gravel wasn't intentionally cheating, but he was underweight which is a rule infraction.  That was my point---- there are different levels of "cheating" or rule breaking and they all can't be treated and punished the same.  

And yes, I thought it was now 1425, but the last example of the rule I could find was 1400, so I went with it.  You get the point. 




91RI
August 27, 2021 at 06:13:01 AM
Joined: 03/01/2005
Posts: 277
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: linbob on August 26 2021 at 03:32:03 PM

I think car and driver must weigh 1425 this year.  Gravel was not cheating.  Crew and driver know they have to weigh in at end of race.  You have no idea when you go out on track how many yellow flags you will have that burns up feul.  You go out with new tires and come in with worn to bald tirs.  These tires lost weight.  If a driver does not hydrate enough he will lose several pounds of weight.  I have on a hot day lost 3-4 pounds just setting on a chair and watching the crew work.  Gravel did not cheat, crew just needed 1 more gallon of fuel in tank.



Being light at the scales isn't cheating, but throwing a 30 lb weight onto  the car before you get to the scales is.



Paintboss
MyWebsite
August 27, 2021 at 10:57:03 AM
Joined: 12/02/2004
Posts: 2118
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: HoldenCaulfield on August 25 2021 at 07:02:10 PM

Again I think everyone is making too big of a deal about the whole thing. He will serve his suspension and get another ride. Life goes on and it will eventually be mostly forgotten.



Not on this Forum it won't be forgotten!! LOL



cheroger
August 27, 2021 at 12:07:17 PM
Joined: 11/30/2004
Posts: 1028
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Paintboss on August 27 2021 at 10:57:03 AM

Not on this Forum it won't be forgotten!! LOL



I bet this incident will be forgoten before his failed attempt at a boxing match with Wayne Johnson will be.




linbob
August 27, 2021 at 05:29:45 PM
Joined: 03/12/2011
Posts: 1658
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: 91RI on August 27 2021 at 06:13:01 AM

Being light at the scales isn't cheating, but throwing a 30 lb weight onto  the car before you get to the scales is.



Name someone that threw 30 lbs in car before scales.  Most tracks are smarter then that and do not let crews near  car till after scaled,  



91RI
August 28, 2021 at 07:27:02 AM
Joined: 03/01/2005
Posts: 277
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: linbob on August 27 2021 at 05:29:45 PM

Name someone that threw 30 lbs in car before scales.  Most tracks are smarter then that and do not let crews near  car till after scaled,  



I'm not going to name names, because most hosehead posters would howl in outrage if I did.  I would be labeled a liar and public enemy number one for defamation of character.  A series official was fired for pointing out the offense as it happened..



El Wingador
August 28, 2021 at 12:57:28 PM
Joined: 09/12/2015
Posts: 280
Reply
This message was edited on August 28, 2021 at 02:00:50 PM by El Wingador
Reply to:
Posted By: 91RI on August 28 2021 at 07:27:02 AM

I'm not going to name names, because most hosehead posters would howl in outrage if I did.  I would be labeled a liar and public enemy number one for defamation of character.  A series official was fired for pointing out the offense as it happened..



They protect their favorites without a doubt ! 
Prime example, last night Kahne jumps the start in the heat race. WoO officials calls it back because they didn't like something. Restart with no jumping penalty for Kahne. 




JJRFan
August 28, 2021 at 02:20:02 PM
Joined: 04/26/2018
Posts: 245
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: 91RI on August 28 2021 at 07:27:02 AM

I'm not going to name names, because most hosehead posters would howl in outrage if I did.  I would be labeled a liar and public enemy number one for defamation of character.  A series official was fired for pointing out the offense as it happened..



I have also heard of this fwiw.



dsc1600
August 28, 2021 at 02:20:36 PM
Joined: 05/31/2007
Posts: 4399
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: El Wingador on August 28 2021 at 12:57:28 PM

They protect their favorites without a doubt ! 
Prime example, last night Kahne jumps the start in the heat race. WoO officials calls it back because they didn't like something. Restart with no jumping penalty for Kahne. 



The only obvious examples of them protecting their own is allowing more time in the work area. A couple of times last year, Sweet was given much more than 2 minutes to make repairs. I've seen many examples of outlaws getting penalized on starts, obviously Gravel losing out on a big payday due to weight, Reutzel getting suspended. 



egras
August 28, 2021 at 06:06:19 PM
Joined: 08/16/2009
Posts: 3982
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: dsc1600 on August 28 2021 at 02:20:36 PM

The only obvious examples of them protecting their own is allowing more time in the work area. A couple of times last year, Sweet was given much more than 2 minutes to make repairs. I've seen many examples of outlaws getting penalized on starts, obviously Gravel losing out on a big payday due to weight, Reutzel getting suspended. 



As has been pointed out numerous times, there is no maximum time in the work area..................................only a guaranteed minimum of 2 minutes during the first half of the race.  There has never been anything stating a maximum amount of time allowed, unless I missed something.  




dsc1600
August 28, 2021 at 06:46:05 PM
Joined: 05/31/2007
Posts: 4399
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: egras on August 28 2021 at 06:06:19 PM

As has been pointed out numerous times, there is no maximum time in the work area..................................only a guaranteed minimum of 2 minutes during the first half of the race.  There has never been anything stating a maximum amount of time allowed, unless I missed something.  



It's irrelevant whether it's a minimum of maximum, if you give more time to your champ to fix his car than his competitors, it's an advantage. I don't think it happens often; but that's the example I can point to of actual favoritism being shown to platinum guys.



egras
August 28, 2021 at 10:33:05 PM
Joined: 08/16/2009
Posts: 3982
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: dsc1600 on August 28 2021 at 06:46:05 PM

It's irrelevant whether it's a minimum of maximum, if you give more time to your champ to fix his car than his competitors, it's an advantage. I don't think it happens often; but that's the example I can point to of actual favoritism being shown to platinum guys.



I've never understood why this is such a hot topic with everyone.  I don't remember anyone in the modern era being a factor after coming out of the work area.   The locals don't care about points, they are there for a win and nothing else.  I guess if everyone feels this happens, maybe that would be my only argument?  I don't know.  So irrelavent to the ending of the race so really a non-factor.  



JonR
August 29, 2021 at 11:50:51 AM
Joined: 05/28/2008
Posts: 872
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: 91RI on August 27 2021 at 06:13:01 AM

Being light at the scales isn't cheating, but throwing a 30 lb weight onto  the car before you get to the scales is.



LOL.... brings back a great memory of Ray Ingalls crew chief complaining about how hot the engine was and putting his head into the cockpit of the car to check the gauges and to step on the scale at the same time. No body was as smooth as Ray Ingalls and he was racing his grandchildren when I watched him race. I would have loved to watch him in his prime.


Nick14
August 29, 2021 at 12:11:29 PM
Joined: 06/04/2012
Posts: 1739
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: dsc1600 on August 28 2021 at 06:46:05 PM

It's irrelevant whether it's a minimum of maximum, if you give more time to your champ to fix his car than his competitors, it's an advantage. I don't think it happens often; but that's the example I can point to of actual favoritism being shown to platinum guys.



They don't just give guys extra time in the work area just because they are a former champ or a platinum member. Earlier this year where Gravel flipped (I think Wilmot?) yes he was in the work area for longer than 2minutes. Other factors that allowed him to get out there was it was red flag conditions so it took longer to get cars going, lined up, and also other cars entered the work area which started their 2minute clock giving Gravel more time. There was a race last year that I believe a crew's 2minutes were up but then Jacob Allen came in because he had a tire going down which started a 2min clock for him and this board & facebook went nuts because they said the other driver's 2min clock. 

Last year after Attica their was someone here trying to sell a conspiracy theory because Sweet was in the work area for longer than 2mins, saying it was because it was because he was the former champ. Me actually being at the track told him no, it was because 2 other cars entered the work area after Sweet did so he had the advantage of their 2min clock as well.  Then add to the fact that their were two local drivers who were arguing about where they lined up, and another local driver pulling off the track aided it. Had nothing to do with being a platinum member, a champion, or having the owner be a nascar driver. Just the advantage of the rules. The only thing that they can fix up on the rule is deciding which cars the tow trucks grap first in a multi car pile up



revjimk
August 29, 2021 at 01:46:35 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7634
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: 91RI on August 28 2021 at 07:27:02 AM

I'm not going to name names, because most hosehead posters would howl in outrage if I did.  I would be labeled a liar and public enemy number one for defamation of character.  A series official was fired for pointing out the offense as it happened..



So now you're not  "a liar and public enemy number one".... just a spreader of unsubstantiated rumors

You could be right.... but how can we know?





Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy