|
|
Topic: Knoxville Nationals Odds
|
Email this topic to a friend |
Subscribe to this Topic
| Report this Topic to Moderator
|
Page 1 of 1 of 12 replies
|
|
|
August 01, 2024 at
02:38:52 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
08/16/2009
|
Posts:
|
4134
|
|
|
This message was edited on
August 01, 2024 at
02:41:41 PM by egras
Just for fun, if you were a bookmaker in vegas, and asked to place odds on drivers to win the Knoxville Nationals, what order and odds would you place on them? (This is just for fun---not meant as a driver popularity contest) I picked my top 20 starting odds. I had to pick Larson as my highest odds because he's the defending champ of the event and was VERY fast both nights against all of these guys at the June Outlaw show. He was actually the fastest car on the track both nights.
4-1 Larson
5-1 Gravel
Schatz
8-1 Logan
Sweet
Macedo
Day
Rico
Gio
12-1 Sunshine
Marks
Reutzel
15-1 Kofoid
Sheldon
Peck
McFadden
Pittman
20-1 Madsen
A. McCarl
Brown
Macri
|
|
|
August 01, 2024 at
04:35:52 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
12/17/2009
|
Posts:
|
2298
|
|
|
I like it! I would probably switch spots with Macedo and Sunshine, but overall I think that's good.
|
|
|
August 01, 2024 at
07:31:23 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
05/03/2007
|
Posts:
|
1656
|
|
|
This message was edited on
August 01, 2024 at
07:32:34 PM by SprintFan16
I think your order is mostly fine but I think your book would go broke paying 4-1 or better on the top three cars. I'd reckon the odds of Larson, Schatz or Gravel winning have to be like 80-90%?
Feel like realistically if books spread odds you'd see like +175 for Larson and +200/+225 for Gravel and Schatz.
|
|
|
|
August 01, 2024 at
07:48:23 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
08/16/2009
|
Posts:
|
4134
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: SprintFan16 on August 01 2024 at 07:31:23 PM
I think your order is mostly fine but I think your book would go broke paying 4-1 or better on the top three cars. I'd reckon the odds of Larson, Schatz or Gravel winning have to be like 80-90%?
Feel like realistically if books spread odds you'd see like +175 for Larson and +200/+225 for Gravel and Schatz.
|
As I said, just for fun. I'm not educated on how to make the books work out.
|
|
|
August 02, 2024 at
04:40:22 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
12/17/2009
|
Posts:
|
2298
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: SprintFan16 on August 01 2024 at 07:31:23 PM
I think your order is mostly fine but I think your book would go broke paying 4-1 or better on the top three cars. I'd reckon the odds of Larson, Schatz or Gravel winning have to be like 80-90%?
Feel like realistically if books spread odds you'd see like +175 for Larson and +200/+225 for Gravel and Schatz.
|
I don't really know about that, but I figure I lose money any time I go into a casino. I'd lose in any casino Egras owns too.
|
|
|
August 02, 2024 at
07:51:17 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
07/15/2014
|
Posts:
|
1254
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: SprintFan16 on August 01 2024 at 07:31:23 PM
I think your order is mostly fine but I think your book would go broke paying 4-1 or better on the top three cars. I'd reckon the odds of Larson, Schatz or Gravel winning have to be like 80-90%?
Feel like realistically if books spread odds you'd see like +175 for Larson and +200/+225 for Gravel and Schatz.
|
Agreed. You'd have a ton of public money and casuals betting Larson as well as Gravel and Schatz. So you'd want to disincentivize a ton of people to bet that. I could put $100 each on the top 3 and still make $100 if one those three won.
I'd actually drop Larson to -105, Gravel to +120, and Schatz to +200. It's a fun exercise to do and I thought for the most part your stuff looked pretty good.
|
|
|
|
August 02, 2024 at
07:55:21 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
07/15/2014
|
Posts:
|
1254
|
|
|
And of course once money started coming in, you would adjust the odds.
|
|
|
August 02, 2024 at
08:30:37 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
08/16/2009
|
Posts:
|
4134
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: Johnny Utah on August 02 2024 at 07:51:17 AM
Agreed. You'd have a ton of public money and casuals betting Larson as well as Gravel and Schatz. So you'd want to disincentivize a ton of people to bet that. I could put $100 each on the top 3 and still make $100 if one those three won.
I'd actually drop Larson to -105, Gravel to +120, and Schatz to +200. It's a fun exercise to do and I thought for the most part your stuff looked pretty good.
|
Thanks Johnny. I was just doing it for fun and was just kinda going for a list of favorites in order. I'm not a sports bettor at all. I play poker quite often, but I have literally bet on 5 sporting events in my entire life! I hate being out of control of my money!
|
|
|
August 02, 2024 at
12:00:27 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
01/19/2009
|
Posts:
|
1251
|
|
|
Larson
Gravel / Schatz / Sweet
Logan/ Day / Rico / Reutzel /
AMAC/ Macedo/ Gio/
Courtney/ Marks/ Kofoid/ Haud/ McFadden / Brown
Macri/ Pittman/ Marks/ Peck / Bayston/ Hafertepe/ Axsom
Holmes/ Garet Williamson/ Allen/ Madsen,
Keep It Real
|
|
|
|
August 03, 2024 at
08:21:42 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
05/31/2007
|
Posts:
|
4481
|
|
|
Larson, Gravel, Schatz and one other driver TBD that will look really good on Wed/Thurs are your favorites. For all the talk that 15-20 drivers can win it, it's a short list in reality.
|
|
|
August 03, 2024 at
04:16:26 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
07/15/2014
|
Posts:
|
1254
|
|
|
Truthfully, in the modern day, let's say post 1985, who would we say had the longest odds that actually won the thing?
Shaffer in 2010?
Scruffy in 1990?
Johnson in 2016?
My call would be Tim Shaffer, but I was definitely surprised how well Jason Johnson ran in 2016 throughout the whole race. How was Bobby Allen running in 1990 in the leadup to that race. Christ, I was young and watched it on my parents couch on TNN courtesy of American Sports Cavalcade.
I remember Mark Kinser was running like a raped ape early on til he broke.
|
|
|
August 03, 2024 at
04:46:03 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
07/15/2023
|
Posts:
|
636
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: Johnny Utah on August 03 2024 at 04:16:26 PM
Truthfully, in the modern day, let's say post 1985, who would we say had the longest odds that actually won the thing?
Shaffer in 2010?
Scruffy in 1990?
Johnson in 2016?
My call would be Tim Shaffer, but I was definitely surprised how well Jason Johnson ran in 2016 throughout the whole race. How was Bobby Allen running in 1990 in the leadup to that race. Christ, I was young and watched it on my parents couch on TNN courtesy of American Sports Cavalcade.
I remember Mark Kinser was running like a raped ape early on til he broke.
|
My guess would be Bobby's win in 90.
|
|
|
|
August 03, 2024 at
05:07:21 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
08/12/2005
|
Posts:
|
892
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: Johnny Utah on August 03 2024 at 04:16:26 PM
Truthfully, in the modern day, let's say post 1985, who would we say had the longest odds that actually won the thing?
Shaffer in 2010?
Scruffy in 1990?
Johnson in 2016?
My call would be Tim Shaffer, but I was definitely surprised how well Jason Johnson ran in 2016 throughout the whole race. How was Bobby Allen running in 1990 in the leadup to that race. Christ, I was young and watched it on my parents couch on TNN courtesy of American Sports Cavalcade.
I remember Mark Kinser was running like a raped ape early on til he broke.
|
I'd have to with Shaffer, he wasn't running much with WoO not even top 20 in points or starts. Bobby was running a bunch ofbWoO races that year and was like top 15 in points right after the full timers. Jason was full time as well and coming on strong. I'd lean Shaffer though
|
|