HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: Move aside 358/360 for 305 Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 1 of 1   of  18 replies
Bet n Housen
MyWebsite
June 29, 2011 at 06:56:42 AM
Joined: 03/24/2011
Posts: 471
Reply
It seems with the costs of 358/360 motors escalating does it appear to you the 305 motors may soon replace the 358/360 motors as the secondary division to the 410 motors,it appears that many more speedways are putting 305 sprinters on their schedules,opinions please......


Sprinter 79
MyWebsite
June 29, 2011 at 07:15:01 AM
Joined: 12/05/2010
Posts: 840
Reply
Maybe, but it actually sad. The 305 engine struggles a little in the power department, so the sprinters loose a little bit of the excitement level that attracts fans. Plus when you say 305 it makes it sound like a filler class. Which could be helped a bit if promoters dropped the engine size from their advertising. But otherwise, the 360 class does put on a better show, they are just way to expensive. 360 as a starter class would be awesome, but they lost sight of the reason that they started the deal. It happens to every form of racing that tries to start a feeder or beginner class. They loose their way.
Never hit stationary objects!

Sprinterl7
June 29, 2011 at 07:41:53 AM
Joined: 06/20/2011
Posts: 9
Reply

I'm old enough to remember when the premiere series in the country had an engine size limit....305! Yep. USAC once had a 305 engine limit, and the racing was not too bad, as I remember it.

But times have changed, haven't they?


Chuck

Formerly known as sprinter25


minthess
MyWebsite
June 29, 2011 at 07:42:33 AM
Joined: 12/09/2008
Posts: 2403
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Bet n Housen on June 29 2011 at 06:56:42 AM
It seems with the costs of 358/360 motors escalating does it appear to you the 305 motors may soon replace the 358/360 motors as the secondary division to the 410 motors,it appears that many more speedways are putting 305 sprinters on their schedules,opinions please......


I see Lynch is a few tenths quicker than stuff 21 years ago. They need to make 305s the top class and a 283 with a single throat the limiteds.


Luna's Ford engine style that won 2 WoO titles and 3 
Kings Royals before a weight rule against the best EVER
in their prime and now DOMINATES super dirt late model
racing is no longer allowed/wanted in a WoO sprint
car.... Was Luna a miracle worker?

Desflur
June 29, 2011 at 08:14:00 AM
Joined: 10/09/2010
Posts: 428
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Bet n Housen on June 29 2011 at 06:56:42 AM
It seems with the costs of 358/360 motors escalating does it appear to you the 305 motors may soon replace the 358/360 motors as the secondary division to the 410 motors,it appears that many more speedways are putting 305 sprinters on their schedules,opinions please......


Go watch a show put on by Smiley and The Sprint Series of Texas----- 305's Enough said, these guys know how to put on a show and I mean a show!!!!



WIsprinter
June 29, 2011 at 09:02:03 AM
Joined: 12/26/2009
Posts: 392
Reply
This message was edited on June 29, 2011 at 09:03:03 AM by WIsprinter

People complain about the purse for 360's compared to 410's wait till they see what 305's run for less than $500 to win. Of course promoters would love to make sprint cars on the same pay scale as one of their stock car classes.




Bet n Housen
MyWebsite
June 29, 2011 at 11:36:01 AM
Joined: 03/24/2011
Posts: 471
Reply
Ref:sprinterl7 ...your answer is precisely why I asked about this today,I really do remember the USACers and they really put on a show,good tight racing and oh so competitive,you wanted to win you had to push it in deeper and hang it out longer and really drive it,no wings,no cockpit side panels,no tricks. Also,as best as I remember you had to have magnaflux papers on the front end (steering componets),and they didn't have these dirt humper(drag rubber) tires,real shocks, roll bar helmet clearance, and alky. USAC was the hot deal then and they were the ticket for sprint car fans,wow,how lucky we were.I today think that the 305 motor class will be the way of the future until the costs of 410 racing gets so ridiculous it will go away eventually or just be limited to geographical areas.I also feel for the 358/360 racers chasing a victory with costs for these getting way out of reach. It is, like it always was, you get something that works, and the dollar puts people out of business.

jalopy 93
June 29, 2011 at 01:54:38 PM
Joined: 04/30/2007
Posts: 64
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Sprinterl7 on June 29 2011 at 07:41:53 AM

I'm old enough to remember when the premiere series in the country had an engine size limit....305! Yep. USAC once had a 305 engine limit, and the racing was not too bad, as I remember it.

But times have changed, haven't they?



IT WAS A 305 C. I. LIMIT USAC RAN THEY WERE TOTALLY DIFFERENT ENGINES AS FAR AS MODIFICATIOS AND RULES WERE CONCERNED.IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY THEY COULD RUN FUEL



linbob
June 29, 2011 at 06:14:49 PM
Joined: 03/12/2011
Posts: 1655
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Bet n Housen on June 29 2011 at 06:56:42 AM
It seems with the costs of 358/360 motors escalating does it appear to you the 305 motors may soon replace the 358/360 motors as the secondary division to the 410 motors,it appears that many more speedways are putting 305 sprinters on their schedules,opinions please......


Maye you shold ask if 360 engines will replace 410. Who can onestly say$ 50,000 410 engines can begood for sport. I always wonder how an orginazation like ASCS can write the rules . The 360 cars. sothat you can spend $3,000 on titanium chassis parts. If ASCS did not allow tit parts every one would be the same. A $40,000 360 engine is crazy also. How many kids and wives suffer becase dad bought a $40,000 engine. It will never pay for itself.The pro engine builders are now building high cost 305. Now that dry sump 305 motors are allowed at some tracks the only savings is the price of heads,




Some Guy In Texas
June 29, 2011 at 06:19:25 PM
Joined: 08/09/2008
Posts: 500
Reply

I like the USAC analogy... but let's be fair, guys.

The USAC 302/305 was a NON-WINGED car with rock-hard tires... they looked at the new, modern double diamond Firestone as the hot tire for a bit!

I love the wings... but in general I see better racing in my limited non-wing racing. The USAC/CRA races at the Bowl back in the day were great, for example. Better than the WoO on most nights.

I think it's crazy that Emmett Hahn hasn't come up with more ASCS non-wing stuff... talk about an affordable program! The high-dollar 360 wouldn't matter much without a high-downforce wing IMO.

The small OCRS-type wings are ok... I'd say go without wings on 305's and offer more 360 nonwing stuff.

I'd like it.



slow_sprinter
June 29, 2011 at 06:59:45 PM
Joined: 08/08/2006
Posts: 319
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: linbob on June 29 2011 at 06:14:49 PM

Maye you shold ask if 360 engines will replace 410. Who can onestly say$ 50,000 410 engines can begood for sport. I always wonder how an orginazation like ASCS can write the rules . The 360 cars. sothat you can spend $3,000 on titanium chassis parts. If ASCS did not allow tit parts every one would be the same. A $40,000 360 engine is crazy also. How many kids and wives suffer becase dad bought a $40,000 engine. It will never pay for itself.The pro engine builders are now building high cost 305. Now that dry sump 305 motors are allowed at some tracks the only savings is the price of heads,



If kids are suffering because Dad bought a 40k engine, then the Dad is a total and utter MORON (yes that was caps its worth yelling about) the thought of that is just CRAZY. People will outspend each other on wheelbarrow racers, lawn mowers, and go-karts, soapboxes, unicycles, lincoln logs, paper airplanes, pogosticks, and rollerskates.

Stuff is messed up, but its sprint cars and its not cheap...sucks it has to be this way, but if you don't the other guy will plain and simple.

Who can list one rule that cant be "fudged" by spending money and gaining an advantage. Hard tires: traction control, Smaller wings? higher priced shocks, spec head? laser, acid etch, sealed crates? aftermarket seal bolts, no Ti? drilled out hollow bolts. Don't have the answer just stating the facts.




madsen
June 29, 2011 at 08:52:31 PM
Joined: 10/09/2010
Posts: 404
Reply
This message was edited on June 29, 2011 at 08:54:51 PM by madsen

I don't know why crate engines aren't the answer. Some tracks are already using them in their late model division, while grandfathering in present-day engines until they need replacing. National dirt late model hall of famer Ronnie Johnson runs a sealed all aluminum CT525 crate engine, has for more than a year now. Cost $7190 or $9750 race ready with all you need to race except carburetor, delivered to your door from GM. During the past 12 months he has won several late model races, including a couple that had 7 or 8 drivers from the WoO and Lucas Late Model series. He has paid for the engine several times over, has as of the story I read dated 11/9/2010, had no problem competing with and often beating $40,000 open engines.

They are working on developing an even more secure sealing system that would enable detection of unauthorized tampering with a "hypo-glyph" system. Johnson ran the engine in 34 races last year while only changing the oil, nothing else, and said, "seems to get stronger the longer we run it". Believe what you want. Maybe the guy works for the seller, who knows.

I believe Ron Shaver will sell the LS7 sprint engine that the Schatz's have been tinkering with for $13,500. The same motor Donny Schatz won an All Star race in Fargo last year with, even being down a hundred+ HP, though the track was dry slick so HP didn't really matter as much as usual. They are continuing to test it on off nights, having tested it at Knoxville and at Minot,ND this year. Breaking spark plugs seems to be a minor problem if I heard correctly.

.


 Lawlessness and liberalism equals Hell.  NY City, 
Detroit, Seattle, Chicago, Minnepolis, etc. We saw it. 
Burning hundreds of buildings, a thousand assaults and 
dozens of murders. Getting worser and worser.


darnall
June 30, 2011 at 12:37:39 PM
Joined: 09/02/2009
Posts: 454
Reply
There are already problems with 305s that are probably going to be impossible to fix... Every region in the country has different rules...with the exception of the Racesaver/Smiley Sitton deal.... Hell in Missouri we have 2 tracks 50 miles apart that run on the same night with different rules...or they did last year but now one of the tracks has unlimited engine rules.. But the worst problem is that there are 18-$22,000 engines out being used in the 305 class already...Lake Ozark Speedway runs a 305 race each fall with hardly any rules and the $20,000 engine stinks up the show compared to the other 30 cars there.....It looks and sounds like all the 360 engines in the other class.. Everybody always has a better idea on rules and every better idea usually ends up stifling any growth of a class. And the 25 sq ft wings are extreme overkill.. They are for the most part a pretty good way for a guy to race a sprintcar with a 5 grand motor investment provided he's not racing against 20 grand engines. I ran one for a couple seasons and had a blast.
Loose is when you hit the wall with the rear of the
car, tight is when you hit the wall with the front of
the car. Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall and
torque is how far you move the wall.

minthess
MyWebsite
June 30, 2011 at 01:35:44 PM
Joined: 12/09/2008
Posts: 2403
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: madsen on June 29 2011 at 08:52:31 PM

I don't know why crate engines aren't the answer. Some tracks are already using them in their late model division, while grandfathering in present-day engines until they need replacing. National dirt late model hall of famer Ronnie Johnson runs a sealed all aluminum CT525 crate engine, has for more than a year now. Cost $7190 or $9750 race ready with all you need to race except carburetor, delivered to your door from GM. During the past 12 months he has won several late model races, including a couple that had 7 or 8 drivers from the WoO and Lucas Late Model series. He has paid for the engine several times over, has as of the story I read dated 11/9/2010, had no problem competing with and often beating $40,000 open engines.

They are working on developing an even more secure sealing system that would enable detection of unauthorized tampering with a "hypo-glyph" system. Johnson ran the engine in 34 races last year while only changing the oil, nothing else, and said, "seems to get stronger the longer we run it". Believe what you want. Maybe the guy works for the seller, who knows.

I believe Ron Shaver will sell the LS7 sprint engine that the Schatz's have been tinkering with for $13,500. The same motor Donny Schatz won an All Star race in Fargo last year with, even being down a hundred+ HP, though the track was dry slick so HP didn't really matter as much as usual. They are continuing to test it on off nights, having tested it at Knoxville and at Minot,ND this year. Breaking spark plugs seems to be a minor problem if I heard correctly.

.



The crate engine is great if you want to virtually eliminate the true car-guy fan. There are still a few fans that enjoy who can build the best piece. There is already a sport involving racing without any engineering or creativity. Its called track and field. Dough Boy riding around in a cookie cutter race car with a massed produced street car engine on a bone dry track just doesn't sound like anything that is going to pack a grand stand any bigger than the one at the local little league field. Cheaper isn't better except for a poor guy that dreams about going as fast as a rich one.


Luna's Ford engine style that won 2 WoO titles and 3 
Kings Royals before a weight rule against the best EVER
in their prime and now DOMINATES super dirt late model
racing is no longer allowed/wanted in a WoO sprint
car.... Was Luna a miracle worker?

MissouriSprinter
June 30, 2011 at 04:38:37 PM
Joined: 05/15/2010
Posts: 87
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: darnall on June 30 2011 at 12:37:39 PM
There are already problems with 305s that are probably going to be impossible to fix... Every region in the country has different rules...with the exception of the Racesaver/Smiley Sitton deal.... Hell in Missouri we have 2 tracks 50 miles apart that run on the same night with different rules...or they did last year but now one of the tracks has unlimited engine rules.. But the worst problem is that there are 18-$22,000 engines out being used in the 305 class already...Lake Ozark Speedway runs a 305 race each fall with hardly any rules and the $20,000 engine stinks up the show compared to the other 30 cars there.....It looks and sounds like all the 360 engines in the other class.. Everybody always has a better idea on rules and every better idea usually ends up stifling any growth of a class. And the 25 sq ft wings are extreme overkill.. They are for the most part a pretty good way for a guy to race a sprintcar with a 5 grand motor investment provided he's not racing against 20 grand engines. I ran one for a couple seasons and had a blast.


The car that finished 2nd the first night and won the second night of the Labor Day show did not have a $20,000 motor. Far from it in fact. Someone mentined dry sump. A lot of the guys running 305's have that stuff laying around from 360 racing.




gentleman
June 30, 2011 at 04:46:25 PM
Joined: 05/16/2008
Posts: 89
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: WIsprinter on June 29 2011 at 09:02:03 AM

People complain about the purse for 360's compared to 410's wait till they see what 305's run for less than $500 to win. Of course promoters would love to make sprint cars on the same pay scale as one of their stock car classes.



Most recently,most tracks have used the lower cost divisions as a reason to lower their costs in the form of less payout to the racers. interestingly,the back gate entry rate has not been reduced to assist in lowering a racers cost. Why is the track a business,and the racer a hobby ?

 



MissouriSprinter
June 30, 2011 at 11:33:25 PM
Joined: 05/15/2010
Posts: 87
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: gentleman on June 30 2011 at 04:46:25 PM

Most recently,most tracks have used the lower cost divisions as a reason to lower their costs in the form of less payout to the racers. interestingly,the back gate entry rate has not been reduced to assist in lowering a racers cost. Why is the track a business,and the racer a hobby ?

 



What track are you speaking of? Perhaps if local tracks started teching the 360's that would go a long way in making sure the "hobby" racers would return weekly.



88sprint
July 01, 2011 at 03:57:33 PM
Joined: 08/13/2006
Posts: 347
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: darnall on June 30 2011 at 12:37:39 PM
There are already problems with 305s that are probably going to be impossible to fix... Every region in the country has different rules...with the exception of the Racesaver/Smiley Sitton deal.... Hell in Missouri we have 2 tracks 50 miles apart that run on the same night with different rules...or they did last year but now one of the tracks has unlimited engine rules.. But the worst problem is that there are 18-$22,000 engines out being used in the 305 class already...Lake Ozark Speedway runs a 305 race each fall with hardly any rules and the $20,000 engine stinks up the show compared to the other 30 cars there.....It looks and sounds like all the 360 engines in the other class.. Everybody always has a better idea on rules and every better idea usually ends up stifling any growth of a class. And the 25 sq ft wings are extreme overkill.. They are for the most part a pretty good way for a guy to race a sprintcar with a 5 grand motor investment provided he's not racing against 20 grand engines. I ran one for a couple seasons and had a blast.


darnall, if you are talking about me, you need to come and check your facts bud!! I can show you what my motor costs, and it doesn't break $10K much less $20K!!! I don't care what it looks or sounds like, it has been teched time and time again and it is legal as they come. Stock GM cast# heads, flat tappet cam and all.....No hard feelings, just don't want people to get wrong info. There is a lot to show for research before building a motor, car setup goes a LONG way with that class also.




catpuppy
July 01, 2011 at 04:12:04 PM
Joined: 07/26/2005
Posts: 1846
Reply
This message was edited on July 01, 2011 at 04:14:20 PM by catpuppy

I will jump in on this discussion here.

360 racing is getting crazy on motor prices. Have heard stories of some of the guys that run regional series thinking about not running ASCS anymore b/c of motor costs. Getting way to expensive for them to field a car. I have heard stories of 305's in the 20 to 30 thousand dollar range as well. Yes the old saying it is only money or it all depends on how fast you want to go applies here. But let me ask you something if we want the sport to survive do we not want more people in cars than out of them?

There is a track here in Central Oklahoma that has a non wing class. This is its second year of running and the class is actually growing in cars. Last year at the beginning of the year that class had three cars. At last check there have been a total of 15 cars that have shown up this year to the track. Rules for the class are simple. Motor is a Ltd mod motor. 350 block. Stock Crank, Flat top pistons, GM Iron heads. Hydraulic cam, and a two barrel carb. Engine cost around 3500 to 4000 on a avg from what I have seen.Tire rules are a RR Hoosier med compound that the ASCS run. So you can buy 2nd hand tires for next to nothing from the national guys. The complaint I hear over and over though is the payout is not enough for people to build a car for this class. Is racing not for fun or lets think we are superstars. At least at the local level. 81 speedway in Wichita has picked up the same rules for a class they are starting the only difference is that you have to run a 16 square foot top wing.

However, like someone said if teching is not done and people start letting rules change then it will become that same thing we are talking about now.


"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands 
in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he 
stands at times of challenge and controversy." 
Martin Luther King, Jr. 

Erich Petersen 



Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy