HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: Schatz in grand forks again Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 1 of 2   of  39 replies
kahneinawing
July 09, 2010 at 08:05:37 PM
Joined: 08/17/2007
Posts: 96
Reply
Donny is here for the second week in a row running an r&d car. Blew a tire in his heat, finished 5th.


pushinthecushin
MyWebsite
July 09, 2010 at 08:26:19 PM
Joined: 05/31/2006
Posts: 997
Reply

I think I heard them say on Dirtvision it's a production corvette motor he is testing. Can anyone confirm?



origopnwhlr
July 09, 2010 at 08:56:14 PM
Joined: 01/31/2010
Posts: 1476
Reply

What about that WoO rule????


TSA...It's not a GROPE...it's a Freedom Pat!


Johnny Gibson
July 09, 2010 at 09:06:20 PM
Joined: 12/02/2004
Posts: 455
Reply

River Cities Speedway hosts a WoO Sprint Series race. WoO Platinum Member teams cannot race non-sanctoined events at tracks that DO NOT host WoO events.



wbh16
July 10, 2010 at 12:32:17 AM
Joined: 04/11/2005
Posts: 230
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Johnny Gibson on July 09 2010 at 09:06:20 PM

River Cities Speedway hosts a WoO Sprint Series race. WoO Platinum Member teams cannot race non-sanctoined events at tracks that DO NOT host WoO events.



Thanks Johnny. I thought this was probably the case.


Rim Rider

jeff24
July 10, 2010 at 10:21:50 AM
Joined: 11/18/2007
Posts: 464
Reply

Two weeks ago the when they were testing the car, an old Parker Stores yellow car, the announcer said at least 3 or 4 times that it was a GM production LS7 crate engine that comes in the ZO6 Vette. I thought, no way, not a production crate engine, that's only 505 HP. He starts at rear of his heat alongsite Dobmeier, and tears to the front, said to my wife, "production LS7 crate engine my ass". Find out from a track official that Danny had called, wanting to test this LS7 engine up at Grand Forks. BUT, they put $5,000+ into the "crate engine" and it had about 750+ HP, not 505HP. The rest of the story. Apparently the extra cubic inches (410 to 427 for the LS7) was forgiven for the test. He was flying to the front in the feature and got involved in a wreck passing the 3rd place car. After last night, two DNQs with this test. I can see big arguments in Grand Forks bars about whether it was a production LS7 engine that anyone can buy for $15,000, afterall, that's what the announcer implied several times.


Adding $6 trillion of debt in his 1st term and now if 
elected again he wouldn't have to worry about an 
electorate in 2016 so the sky is the limit.And his EPA 
would continue to put the screws to oil drilling and 
mining for coal.Can you say bankruptcy.


origopnwhlr
July 10, 2010 at 10:29:58 AM
Joined: 01/31/2010
Posts: 1476
Reply
This message was edited on July 10, 2010 at 10:37:17 AM by origopnwhlr

They wouldn't be dishonest about something like this would they?


TSA...It's not a GROPE...it's a Freedom Pat!

pushinthecushin
MyWebsite
July 10, 2010 at 10:31:24 AM
Joined: 05/31/2006
Posts: 997
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: jeff24 on July 10 2010 at 10:21:50 AM

Two weeks ago the when they were testing the car, an old Parker Stores yellow car, the announcer said at least 3 or 4 times that it was a GM production LS7 crate engine that comes in the ZO6 Vette. I thought, no way, not a production crate engine, that's only 505 HP. He starts at rear of his heat alongsite Dobmeier, and tears to the front, said to my wife, "production LS7 crate engine my ass". Find out from a track official that Danny had called, wanting to test this LS7 engine up at Grand Forks. BUT, they put $5,000+ into the "crate engine" and it had about 750+ HP, not 505HP. The rest of the story. Apparently the extra cubic inches (410 to 427 for the LS7) was forgiven for the test. He was flying to the front in the feature and got involved in a wreck passing the 3rd place car. After last night, two DNQs with this test. I can see big arguments in Grand Forks bars about whether it was a production LS7 engine that anyone can buy for $15,000, afterall, that's what the announcer implied several times.



Thanks for the clarification



Rail
July 10, 2010 at 10:36:04 AM
Joined: 05/19/2009
Posts: 580
Reply
This message was edited on July 10, 2010 at 12:20:32 PM by Rail
Reply to:
Posted By: origopnwhlr on July 10 2010 at 10:29:58 AM

They wouldn't be dishonest about something like this would they?



No way!


.


lynnthurmanphotos
July 10, 2010 at 03:56:19 PM
Joined: 02/12/2009
Posts: 29
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Johnny Gibson on July 09 2010 at 09:06:20 PM

River Cities Speedway hosts a WoO Sprint Series race. WoO Platinum Member teams cannot race non-sanctoined events at tracks that DO NOT host WoO events.



You didn't mention that they cannot run any ASCS sanctioned event even if the track does host WoO events. Seen this earlier this year at Lone Star Speedway.



dirtraceorbust
MyWebsite
July 11, 2010 at 12:33:24 PM
Joined: 10/10/2009
Posts: 650
Reply

Anyone know if this $15,000 crate engine test with the $5000 plus added to it that was mentioned, was something the Outlaws are doing? Don't understand why Danny Schatz would be testing a GM crate engine, as his son drives for TSR now. But I do believe there are some tracks that use crate engines in their late model class. Seems to be cheating would become a big issue.


Lawlessness + liberalism = HELL -  NYC, Detroit, Chicago, 
Seattle, LA  Who the H runs those cities. 

gofast123
July 11, 2010 at 02:31:24 PM
Joined: 06/27/2010
Posts: 12
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: lynnthurmanphotos on July 10 2010 at 03:56:19 PM

You didn't mention that they cannot run any ASCS sanctioned event even if the track does host WoO events. Seen this earlier this year at Lone Star Speedway.



Maybe because ASCS has nothing to do with this thread?




gofast123
July 11, 2010 at 02:38:09 PM
Joined: 06/27/2010
Posts: 12
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: dirtraceorbust on July 11 2010 at 12:33:24 PM

Anyone know if this $15,000 crate engine test with the $5000 plus added to it that was mentioned, was something the Outlaws are doing? Don't understand why Danny Schatz would be testing a GM crate engine, as his son drives for TSR now. But I do believe there are some tracks that use crate engines in their late model class. Seems to be cheating would become a big issue.



This thread is mutating fast...

Was it Danny or Donny at Grand Forks? Was the $15k before or after the mods were made?

Was the crate test for WoO? or TSR? or GM? or for Shatz? or all the above?

So little real information, but so many opinions...





jeff24
July 11, 2010 at 02:40:16 PM
Joined: 11/18/2007
Posts: 464
Reply

pushingthecushion said that it was mentioned on DirtVision about Schatz running the crate engine. Did they talk about this as if he was running it at that WoO race being broadcast on DV or were they talking about the fact that he was only testing it at Grand Forks. I'd also like to know why he (Danny Schatz) is doing this? Doesn't make any sense. Maybe the Outlaws are considering cutting costs by mandating a crate engine and they've hired Danny Schtaz to do some testing??? A long shot I know. And there has been nothing on this site about it or in NSSN.


Adding $6 trillion of debt in his 1st term and now if 
elected again he wouldn't have to worry about an 
electorate in 2016 so the sky is the limit.And his EPA 
would continue to put the screws to oil drilling and 
mining for coal.Can you say bankruptcy.

jeff24
July 11, 2010 at 02:49:49 PM
Joined: 11/18/2007
Posts: 464
Reply

Sorry, I missed seeing gofast123's post. The LS7 engine is $14,900 at GM Performance parts, but in a search it can be found for between $13,600 and $16,000. I was told they had added aproximately $5000 (making it about $20,000) to get it to a competetive 750 to 800hp, doubt that that HP range would be competitive in WoO series. Apparently no one has any info about why this was done twice on consecutive Friday nights in Grand Forks, which is 70 miles north of Fargo. PS Donny was driving.


Adding $6 trillion of debt in his 1st term and now if 
elected again he wouldn't have to worry about an 
electorate in 2016 so the sky is the limit.And his EPA 
would continue to put the screws to oil drilling and 
mining for coal.Can you say bankruptcy.


biggy johnson
July 11, 2010 at 03:11:58 PM
Joined: 08/02/2005
Posts: 177
Reply

I talked to Danny last night for about 30 minutes about this deal & apparently they are trying to get a type of crate motor program to lower cost of sprint car racing on the local level. They are trying to get it back to where locals can buy a competitive engine that will last a entire season for us weekend racers. The engine they are running is approx $20k from Shaver & they are going to test this setup at Knoxville nationals on an off night to see if it can be competitive there as well.



Hawker
July 11, 2010 at 03:18:23 PM
Joined: 11/23/2004
Posts: 2809
Reply
Two questions come to mind on this. First, do you think you will ever see everyone come to an agreement to allow electronic fuel injection, which will require a battery? Second...Do you also think that the "powers that be" will allow an engine that is loaded full of titanium parts such as the crankshaft?
Member of this message board since 1997

dirtybeer
July 11, 2010 at 08:30:10 PM
Joined: 11/25/2005
Posts: 558
Reply

I believe 360 car counts are even going down,engine cost needs to be looked at.I have always thought a bigger engine modeled after the 305 class would be a good way to go.Instead of a 305 block,use a 350 or 400 block and keep pretty much the same engine rules,give it a set of easily available and reasonably priced heads such as Dart or World product,and you would have a strong running engine for about the same bucks as a 305.




mattmusselldesigns
MyWebsite
July 12, 2010 at 04:55:27 PM
Joined: 06/16/2009
Posts: 368
Reply
This message was edited on July 12, 2010 at 04:57:11 PM by mattmusselldesigns
Reply to:
Posted By: Hawker on July 11 2010 at 03:18:23 PM
Two questions come to mind on this. First, do you think you will ever see everyone come to an agreement to allow electronic fuel injection, which will require a battery? Second...Do you also think that the "powers that be" will allow an engine that is loaded full of titanium parts such as the crankshaft?


This motor uses titanium intake valves and connecting rods but the crankshaft is 4140 forged steel. They even have an optional Callies forged steel crank available. As far as electronic fuel injection I am certain that is not being used in the sprint car testing. In fact that is probably where a good deal of the $5000 was spent, injection and setting it up for a mag, cam swap etc.. I like that it uses dowel pinned forged steel 6 bolt caps too that means potentially longer bearing life from a reduction in torsional flex, at least in my humble opinion.

I have to say I think this is a very good step if they can get the results their looking for in testing. A solid good performing motor for around $20,000 is not a bad deal. This could very well revive big cubic inch sprint car racing and give racers/tracks another option rather than going 360ci. To make horsepower you need displacement and or RPM. When you restrict cubic inches you need to twist the motors harder and that leads to premature failure of critical parts. I think this deal has legs and we will see this on racetracks soon.


"Winged or non-winged its all about 
the sprint cars for me!"
http://mattmusselldesigns.daportfolio.com

Hawker
July 12, 2010 at 05:26:42 PM
Joined: 11/23/2004
Posts: 2809
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: mattmusselldesigns on July 12 2010 at 04:55:27 PM

This motor uses titanium intake valves and connecting rods but the crankshaft is 4140 forged steel. They even have an optional Callies forged steel crank available. As far as electronic fuel injection I am certain that is not being used in the sprint car testing. In fact that is probably where a good deal of the $5000 was spent, injection and setting it up for a mag, cam swap etc.. I like that it uses dowel pinned forged steel 6 bolt caps too that means potentially longer bearing life from a reduction in torsional flex, at least in my humble opinion.

I have to say I think this is a very good step if they can get the results their looking for in testing. A solid good performing motor for around $20,000 is not a bad deal. This could very well revive big cubic inch sprint car racing and give racers/tracks another option rather than going 360ci. To make horsepower you need displacement and or RPM. When you restrict cubic inches you need to twist the motors harder and that leads to premature failure of critical parts. I think this deal has legs and we will see this on racetracks soon.



Yep, my mistake on the crank....I too am in favor of a competitive alternative to what's out there now. I just fear that it will be a hell of a fight to get anyone to come on board to support it. I look back at the original Sprint Bandits "business plan" and I thought it was a great idea at the time, but it died quickly. I still stand on the soap box during many bench racing discussions and say that the cure to all of this would be bricks for tires on all four corners along with unlimited cubic inches and open up the fuel rules (let them oxygenate their fuel).
Member of this message board since 1997



Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy