The Supreme Court has struck down a California Wholesale Soccer Jersey Supplier law that would have banned selling “violent” video games to children, a case balancing free speech rights with consumer protection.The 7-2 ruling Monday is a victory for video game makers and sellers, who said the ban — which had yet to go into effect — would extend too far. They say the existing nationwide, industry-imposed, voluntary rating system is an adequate screen for parents to judge the appropriateness of computer game content.

The state says it has a legal obligation to protect children from graphic interactive images when the industry has failed to do so.”As a means of assisting concerned parents it (the law) is seriously overinclusive because it abridges the First Amendment rights of young people whose parents (and aunts and uncles) think violent video games are a harmless pastime,” wrote Justice Antonin Scalia German Soccer Jersey for the majority.Supreme Court sees video games as art,In dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer framed the law’s intent differently.As a means of assisting concerned parents it (the law) is seriously overinclusive because it abridges the First Amendment rights of young people whose parents (and aunts and uncles) think violent video games are a harmless pastime.”The First Amendment does not disable government from helping parents make such a choice here — a choice not to have their children buy extremely violent, interactive games,” he wrote.At issue is how far constitutional protections of free speech and expression, as well as due process, can be applied to youngsters. Critics of the content-based restrictions say the government would in effect be engaged in the censorship business, using “community standards” to evaluate artistic and commercial content.

A federal Bayern Soccer Jersey appeals court in San Francisco last year tossed out the law before it took effect, after then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed it in 2005. He had applauded the high court’s decision to intervene. “We have a responsibility to our kids and our communities to protect against the effects of games that depict ultraviolent actions, just as we already do with movies,” the governor said. The onetime actor made his name playing characters engaged in similarly violent acts in such movies as “Terminator.”The legislation was designed to strengthen the current industry-controlled rating system, and would have placed an outright ban on the sale or rental to those under 18 of games deemed excessively “violent.” As defined by California Robben Jersey, such interactive games are those in which the player is given the choice of “killing, maiming, dismembering or sexually assaulting an image of a human being” in offensive ways. It also defined such games as those that would “appeal to a deviant or morbid interest of children and are patently offensive to prevailing community standards.”