HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | RacersAuction.com | HoseheadsClassifieds.com
Hoosier Tire Great Plains | Hoosier Mid Atlantic | Racing Warehouse | Performance Race Parts | Xtreme Race Parts

Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead

Topic: Couple questions for fans regarding drugs in Sprint Car racing
Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
First | Previous | Next | Last Reply 101 to 120 of 189
Hotlapn74
November 26, 2014 at 06:23:26 PM
Joined: 11/26/2014
Posts: 1
Reply

 

I’m heavily involved in sprintcar racing and have a drug testing business as well. Our primary business is acting as a third party administrator to the transportation industry to insure our customers remain in compliance with Federal drug testing rules and regulations.  Ie; policies, training, random selection and testing.  

 

I have been approached by a couple different promoters/track owners regarding implementing a program and have since put a great deal of thought in how it could be done effectively and affordably based on my knowledge of being on both sides of the fence.

 

Random testing would be the best deterrent as any given driver could be selected for testing each and every time they race.  Random selections could be accomplished fairly by grouping drivers in a consortium from which to be selected. Consortium pools could consist of multiple tracks, and/or series, or even based on multiple tracks within a time zone. The pool(s) could be easily created from drivers registered through race monitor.  Selections would be computer generated at a specified percentage each night of racing. Some tracks may not have any, or very few drivers selected at an event, as other may have multiple selected.  The cost would be a flat fee based on participation and not the number of test conducted.

 

I think the most effective way to complete the random testing would be to notify the selected driver at the completion of the event and not before. There are way too many variables to try and accomplish testing during a race. If a driver is exhibiting signs of substance abuse or misuse of alcohol prior to the race, the promoter could then request a reasonable cause test and pull the driver from competition should the test(s) show “NOT NEGATIVE”.

As far as consequences, I think it would be appropriate to follow DOT guidelines. The driver would not be eligible to participate in future events until being cleared by an approved Substance Abuse and Professional and subject to follow-up testing (all at the cost of the driver).



onehunglow
November 26, 2014 at 07:33:11 PM
Joined: 12/22/2013
Posts: 100
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: StaggerLee on November 26 2014 at 04:49:17 PM

Good one douche bag, so I was right, you are a bit dim. We are having an adult discussion with big words onehunglow, go find a thread about ford vs Chevy that's more your speed.



At least twice in two separate posts you said you were done with this thread yet you still keep posting. How are we to believe you when you can't even keep you word... lol



onehunglow
November 26, 2014 at 07:56:04 PM
Joined: 12/22/2013
Posts: 100
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: StaggerLee on November 26 2014 at 04:55:56 PM

What about alcohol still in your system from the night before, is that illegal? You do realize legal drugs like alcohol kill way more people than all illicit drugs combined. The demon killer weed that has accounted foe exactly no deaths......ever that's what we should worry about because it's Illegal and my TV says it's bad, they just never say what's so bad about it. It's legal to smoke a cigarette and get wasted drunk but dont you dare smoke a joint cuz it's baaaad!!!!! Hypocrisy at its finest, but it's ok because it's illegal.



You Sir need to grab the paper bag and breath in & out very slowly.  Your about to bust a vain. I don't think I or anyone else needs you to save us from " the man" , " uncle Sam" , or who ever else is stoking your paranoia.  You can get legal drugs to help you deal with it. Unfortunately,  the corner dealer probably can't.  You'll need to go to a professional doctor for your prescription. 

But I am really touched, really touched in your efforts to save me without even knowing me... a HUGE THANK YOU from me to you!!!



BigRightRear
November 26, 2014 at 08:07:44 PM
Joined: 11/27/2004
Posts: 3751
Reply

Australia is not caving to stoners...

 

http://www.speedwayaustralia.net.au/Media/291/Speedway-Australia-Maintains-Tough-Stance-Against-Drugs-In-Sport/

 

 


Lincoln 1845 ft/.35 mile T1=118MPH 
Eldora 2287 ft/.43mile T3=135MPH
Port 2716 ft/.51 mile T3=TBD
Grove 2792 ft/.53 mile T3=135MPH
Selinsgrove 2847 ft/.54 mile T1=136MPH
"I didn't move to PA from El Paso in search of better 
weather." Van May

hatesfenders
November 26, 2014 at 08:21:07 PM
Joined: 08/13/2012
Posts: 76
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: onehunglow on November 26 2014 at 07:56:04 PM

You Sir need to grab the paper bag and breath in & out very slowly.  Your about to bust a vain. I don't think I or anyone else needs you to save us from " the man" , " uncle Sam" , or who ever else is stoking your paranoia.  You can get legal drugs to help you deal with it. Unfortunately,  the corner dealer probably can't.  You'll need to go to a professional doctor for your prescription. 

But I am really touched, really touched in your efforts to save me without even knowing me... a HUGE THANK YOU from me to you!!!



seems as if u are doing the same to him without even knowing him.  and why argue over a plant that will be legal in the near future.  maybe you have the paranoia.  While we are at it explain why booz is safer without screaming illegal.  instead of drug testing why don't every series, sanction and track have a preseason meeting and all should have to view "reefer madness"  there is enough information on that video alone that nobody would want to try it.



hatesfenders
November 26, 2014 at 08:23:20 PM
Joined: 08/13/2012
Posts: 76
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: BigRightRear on November 26 2014 at 08:07:44 PM

Australia is not caving to stoners...

 

http://www.speedwayaustralia.net.au/Media/291/Speedway-Australia-Maintains-Tough-Stance-Against-Drugs-In-Sport/

 

 



didnt they basically give up their gun rights too?  



chance2195
November 26, 2014 at 08:46:45 PM
Joined: 07/05/2013
Posts: 51
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: BigRightRear on November 26 2014 at 08:07:44 PM

Australia is not caving to stoners...

 

http://www.speedwayaustralia.net.au/Media/291/Speedway-Australia-Maintains-Tough-Stance-Against-Drugs-In-Sport/

 

 



I can't wait until they bust a junior quarter midget racer for taking more Ritalin than prescribed.  Is it time to get tough and bring the police dogs, armored vehicle and water cannons to the pits?  Ironically the Aussie speedway testing program is similar to the Aussie equine racing testing program.  Affiliated labs.  At least the horse owners get access to the B panel.



chance2195
November 26, 2014 at 08:54:35 PM
Joined: 07/05/2013
Posts: 51
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: JonR on November 26 2014 at 10:32:59 AM

You have officially crossed the line into crazed fanatic.   The amount of people saved by DUI laws are staggering.   The amount of people killed even with the DUI laws are even more staggering.   To say that DUI laws are a form of intrusion only proves that you are out of touch with the rest of country.



Please name a specific person SAVED by the DUI laws.  DUI laws don't stop people from drinking and driving.  Look at the arrests during a crack down.  Most if not all are not DUI related.  Travelling across America only to be stopped, questioned, forced to show ID is not freedom.  You need some nice Helen Reddy music to tuck to.



onehunglow
November 26, 2014 at 09:15:46 PM
Joined: 12/22/2013
Posts: 100
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: hatesfenders on November 26 2014 at 08:21:07 PM

seems as if u are doing the same to him without even knowing him.  and why argue over a plant that will be legal in the near future.  maybe you have the paranoia.  While we are at it explain why booz is safer without screaming illegal.  instead of drug testing why don't every series, sanction and track have a preseason meeting and all should have to view "reefer madness"  there is enough information on that video alone that nobody would want to try it.



I don't want a drunk behind the wheel of a sprint car or street car either.

I've never seen anything like the generation of millenniums that need to be high on dope, whacked out on pain killers, hugging the bottle or need as many hugs to unwind, relax, release stress or whatever else their trying to escape from. 

How's Turkey doing as a country with the most liberal drug laws in the world ? Look it up and read before posting so you know what your talking about so you won't look foolish. Or are you gonna tell me it's all propaganda put out by " The Man "



hatesfenders
November 26, 2014 at 09:27:13 PM
Joined: 08/13/2012
Posts: 76
Reply

um turkey? maybe you want to check that out again on the drug laws there before posting.  and there is no reason to throw baby boomers into the argument 



chance2195
November 26, 2014 at 10:05:33 PM
Joined: 07/05/2013
Posts: 51
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Hotlapn74 on November 26 2014 at 06:23:26 PM

 

I’m heavily involved in sprintcar racing and have a drug testing business as well. Our primary business is acting as a third party administrator to the transportation industry to insure our customers remain in compliance with Federal drug testing rules and regulations.  Ie; policies, training, random selection and testing.  

 

I have been approached by a couple different promoters/track owners regarding implementing a program and have since put a great deal of thought in how it could be done effectively and affordably based on my knowledge of being on both sides of the fence.

 

Random testing would be the best deterrent as any given driver could be selected for testing each and every time they race.  Random selections could be accomplished fairly by grouping drivers in a consortium from which to be selected. Consortium pools could consist of multiple tracks, and/or series, or even based on multiple tracks within a time zone. The pool(s) could be easily created from drivers registered through race monitor.  Selections would be computer generated at a specified percentage each night of racing. Some tracks may not have any, or very few drivers selected at an event, as other may have multiple selected.  The cost would be a flat fee based on participation and not the number of test conducted.

 

I think the most effective way to complete the random testing would be to notify the selected driver at the completion of the event and not before. There are way too many variables to try and accomplish testing during a race. If a driver is exhibiting signs of substance abuse or misuse of alcohol prior to the race, the promoter could then request a reasonable cause test and pull the driver from competition should the test(s) show “NOT NEGATIVE”.

As far as consequences, I think it would be appropriate to follow DOT guidelines. The driver would not be eligible to participate in future events until being cleared by an approved Substance Abuse and Professional and subject to follow-up testing (all at the cost of the driver).



If you're with Ohio Health Consortium out of Zanesville I'm sorry hear about the tests given to Sheely & Sands employees on Riverview Dr this summer.  Your guy left the explorer's hatchback open.  The plastic bag of specimens accidetally fell in the bushes in front of the Islamic center.

Why doesn't CRL & Quest release null hypothesis testing and standard deviation data on their tests?  CRL's last six panel got approval with 15 samples.  Correlation does not equal causality, except in the drug testing world.  Money talks.  

 



gators0849
November 26, 2014 at 11:17:29 PM
Joined: 05/07/2013
Posts: 1991
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Hotlapn74 on November 26 2014 at 06:23:26 PM

 

I’m heavily involved in sprintcar racing and have a drug testing business as well. Our primary business is acting as a third party administrator to the transportation industry to insure our customers remain in compliance with Federal drug testing rules and regulations.  Ie; policies, training, random selection and testing.  

 

I have been approached by a couple different promoters/track owners regarding implementing a program and have since put a great deal of thought in how it could be done effectively and affordably based on my knowledge of being on both sides of the fence.

 

Random testing would be the best deterrent as any given driver could be selected for testing each and every time they race.  Random selections could be accomplished fairly by grouping drivers in a consortium from which to be selected. Consortium pools could consist of multiple tracks, and/or series, or even based on multiple tracks within a time zone. The pool(s) could be easily created from drivers registered through race monitor.  Selections would be computer generated at a specified percentage each night of racing. Some tracks may not have any, or very few drivers selected at an event, as other may have multiple selected.  The cost would be a flat fee based on participation and not the number of test conducted.

 

I think the most effective way to complete the random testing would be to notify the selected driver at the completion of the event and not before. There are way too many variables to try and accomplish testing during a race. If a driver is exhibiting signs of substance abuse or misuse of alcohol prior to the race, the promoter could then request a reasonable cause test and pull the driver from competition should the test(s) show “NOT NEGATIVE”.

As far as consequences, I think it would be appropriate to follow DOT guidelines. The driver would not be eligible to participate in future events until being cleared by an approved Substance Abuse and Professional and subject to follow-up testing (all at the cost of the driver).



I would actually like to talk to you off the message board about this subject. My contact email is [email protected]. Thanks.



StaggerLee
MyWebsite
November 27, 2014 at 09:31:47 AM
Joined: 05/14/2014
Posts: 645
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: onehunglow on November 26 2014 at 07:33:11 PM

At least twice in two separate posts you said you were done with this thread yet you still keep posting. How are we to believe you when you can't even keep you word... lol



Thanks for paying attention, you have it backward though dim light, I'm not trying to save anyone from anything, I give you and everyone else enough credit to save yourself WITHOUT interference from some governing body trying to save you from your bad decisions before you make them.  Cmon man, if your gonna try to bust my balls at least make sense.



StaggerLee
MyWebsite
November 27, 2014 at 09:43:22 AM
Joined: 05/14/2014
Posts: 645
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: onehunglow on November 26 2014 at 09:15:46 PM

I don't want a drunk behind the wheel of a sprint car or street car either.

I've never seen anything like the generation of millenniums that need to be high on dope, whacked out on pain killers, hugging the bottle or need as many hugs to unwind, relax, release stress or whatever else their trying to escape from. 

How's Turkey doing as a country with the most liberal drug laws in the world ? Look it up and read before posting so you know what your talking about so you won't look foolish. Or are you gonna tell me it's all propaganda put out by " The Man "



Did you just pull Turkey out of the air? You are a fountain of misinformation, Turkeys drug laws are very harsh, 10 to 20 years for possesion. Good God man, your just making yourself look stupid, Check out the Netherlands where the cops don't carry guns and drugs are decriminalized, the people there are able to make their own choices about drug use and they have some of the lowest drug addiction/drug abuse statistics in the world, how can it be when Noone is testing them or fining them or telling them what's illegal to put in their bodies? Oh my god these people can make the right decision without anyone looking out for their saftey.



onehunglow
November 27, 2014 at 10:28:27 AM
Joined: 12/22/2013
Posts: 100
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: StaggerLee on November 27 2014 at 09:31:47 AM

Thanks for paying attention, you have it backward though dim light, I'm not trying to save anyone from anything, I give you and everyone else enough credit to save yourself WITHOUT interference from some governing body trying to save you from your bad decisions before you make them.  Cmon man, if your gonna try to bust my balls at least make sense.



I'll have to get back to you tomorrow.  Gonna take the day off to reflect on all the great things in life we should be thankful for. No name calling, sharp words and such on Thanksgiving Day. Apparently we were brought up extremely different Stagger ( thank you mom & dad).

Stagger, I hope you and your family have a Happy and Safe Thanksgiving Day...I Really do !

Happy Thanksgiving to all on the message board. Whether we differ on our opinions or not...still the best country in the world !



revjimk
November 27, 2014 at 04:56:59 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 8060
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: henry chinaski on November 26 2014 at 01:02:26 PM

You jackwads who think people who smoke cannabis are nothing but burned out lazy stoners are so damn clueless. We are your friendly neighbors, lawyers, doctors, teachers, engineers, scientists, librarians, race car drivers, military veterans, construction workers, college students, etc, etc. Get with the times man. Anyone with even a half functioning brain knows that the prohibition of cannabis has been orchestrated not as a public safety mechanism but rather one to oppress peoples rights. Cannabis has long been proven safe, contrary to what the government endorsed and wholly falsified studies have stated. Why are you so hell bent on disinfranchising a large percentage of race car drivers who choose to relax after the races in a harmless way? I suppose they should just get drunk then beat their wife and kids instead so they can pass a stupid unnecessary drug test.



Well said



captrat
November 30, 2014 at 12:55:46 PM
Joined: 08/11/2008
Posts: 94
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: gators0849 on November 24 2014 at 06:08:52 PM

I'm writing a five-part series on drug testing in Sprint Car racing that will roll out in a couple weeks. Hoping for the week after Thanksgiving. I wanted to include some thoughts from fans, so I figured this was the best place to put the questions:

Are you in favor of drug testing in Sprint Car racing? Why/Why not?

Do you think there is a need for it in Sprint Car racing? Meaning, do you think there is a problem?

What do you think the penalty should be for someone that comes back with a positive test?

Thanks for your input. Appreciate it.



Utter, short-sighted nonsense.  typical of today's illogical thinking where we take an anecdote and make a broad, general conclusion.  Big difference between drawing a conclusion on extensive empirical data than this.  I hope this so-called article never makes print anywhere until there is adequate investigation and gathering of related data.  Basing a piece on this at this time is amateurish and borders on journalistic irresponsibility.  Using the term jouranalism in this case is truly a gift! 



BigRightRear
November 30, 2014 at 06:52:40 PM
Joined: 11/27/2004
Posts: 3751
Reply

ahem...jeremy writes for a newspaper.

Jeremy, perhaps you will ask "how bad will late adopters look if the NSL or the Renegade Series becomes the first sprint series to announce a drug policy similar to what drivers agree to when they race in Australia?"


Lincoln 1845 ft/.35 mile T1=118MPH 
Eldora 2287 ft/.43mile T3=135MPH
Port 2716 ft/.51 mile T3=TBD
Grove 2792 ft/.53 mile T3=135MPH
Selinsgrove 2847 ft/.54 mile T1=136MPH
"I didn't move to PA from El Paso in search of better 
weather." Van May

Truth teller
December 01, 2014 at 01:33:06 AM
Joined: 04/14/2014
Posts: 251
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: captrat on November 30 2014 at 12:55:46 PM

Utter, short-sighted nonsense.  typical of today's illogical thinking where we take an anecdote and make a broad, general conclusion.  Big difference between drawing a conclusion on extensive empirical data than this.  I hope this so-called article never makes print anywhere until there is adequate investigation and gathering of related data.  Basing a piece on this at this time is amateurish and borders on journalistic irresponsibility.  Using the term jouranalism in this case is truly a gift! 



If the "so-called article makes print anywhere..." Um... how many Sprint Car writers anywhere in the country get more articles published in a daily newspaper than Jeremy Elliott does?



StaggerLee
MyWebsite
December 01, 2014 at 09:30:36 AM
Joined: 05/14/2014
Posts: 645
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: captrat on November 30 2014 at 12:55:46 PM

Utter, short-sighted nonsense.  typical of today's illogical thinking where we take an anecdote and make a broad, general conclusion.  Big difference between drawing a conclusion on extensive empirical data than this.  I hope this so-called article never makes print anywhere until there is adequate investigation and gathering of related data.  Basing a piece on this at this time is amateurish and borders on journalistic irresponsibility.  Using the term jouranalism in this case is truly a gift! 



As usual you guys are missing this posters point. Collecting data from the Hosehead forum and the 12 posters on this thread is a poor way to compile data. If we all had our first and last name listed it might be different. Keyboard jockeys, myself included, often post comments that we would never say in a formal face to face interview where your comments would be followed by your first and last name. So to say that this info was compiled from fans is a bit misleading. This poster is just saying that when writing an article about a hot button topic like this, you should take some time and do real research and investigation before publishing an atricle that effects so many people like this does. The bashing of Jeremy was not needed, but his point is relevent and somthing that perhaps Jeremy should consider before rushing this 5 part article to the paper.



First | Previous | Next | Last Reply 101 to 120 of 189


Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login




 

If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2026 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy