HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: Why is there so much emphasis in time trials in 410 racing?? Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 1 of 2   of  22 replies
Chagil
May 22, 2016 at 11:35:12 AM
Joined: 05/22/2016
Posts: 20
Reply

Does anybody like to watch time trials?




NWFAN
May 22, 2016 at 12:09:58 PM
Joined: 12/07/2006
Posts: 2358
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Chagil on May 22 2016 at 11:35:12 AM

Does anybody like to watch time trials?



ha, altman changed his handle...


Ascot was the greatest of all time..

West Capital wasn't half bad either..

Life is good...

19 Posse
May 22, 2016 at 12:15:57 PM
Joined: 12/24/2012
Posts: 364
Reply

It is what it is...putting the cars in "flights" seems pretty fair...

why penalize a guy for doing his job and being fast? 

I like to watch time trials when I watch wingless because the guys run different lines...the winged cars are normally locked on the same line.




Limowreck
May 22, 2016 at 12:22:39 PM
Joined: 08/14/2012
Posts: 137
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: on at


+1



brettco
May 22, 2016 at 12:35:57 PM
Joined: 12/03/2004
Posts: 517
Reply

 I don't think when the regular weekend racers are already strapped for finances that you should gain an advantage for having a stronger fresher engine.  At the outlaw level who cares but the outlaws also need the weekend racers to play along. Quick times are 90% engine. Timing 360s and 305s makes even less sense. That said now that most races don't even have enough cars for a B main it's a little too late to fix things.



Chagil
May 22, 2016 at 12:45:56 PM
Joined: 05/22/2016
Posts: 20
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Chagil on May 22 2016 at 11:35:12 AM

Does anybody like to watch time trials?



Is the main reason that teams are spending 40,000+ on engines?




AussiePosseFan
May 22, 2016 at 01:23:03 PM
Joined: 01/13/2016
Posts: 10
Reply

I agree there is too much emphasis on time trials! I don’t know if it’s a good reason to get rid of them all together but there is too much emphasis on them. That’s why I like two rounds of heats and time trials with even points given for time trails and heats like the Dirt Classic format or Australian format.   



oswald
May 22, 2016 at 01:23:58 PM
Joined: 11/30/2004
Posts: 1995
Reply

A. Drivers prefer time trials for lining up heats. They feel it is better than a draw.

B. It's not a good idea to start too slow of a car at the front of a race on the bigger high speed tracks.

C. Lining heats up by point standings keeps any outsiders from dropping in to race a night or 2 during the season because they have to start in back all night.

Personally I enjoy watching time trials. 



Nick14
May 22, 2016 at 01:44:18 PM
Joined: 06/04/2012
Posts: 1737
Reply

Yes I watch time trials. Much rather them time trial than draw.




revjimk
May 22, 2016 at 02:32:15 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7617
Reply

The only thing I like about time trials is that its a chance to familiarize yourself with drivers & car numbers, if you don't already know them. I like the Aussie suggestion, random draw, dual reversed heats.

Or old style "run whatcha brung", points leaders start in the back.... spend as much as you want on cars, but face a handicap



Chagil
May 22, 2016 at 02:33:03 PM
Joined: 05/22/2016
Posts: 20
Reply

Lot of time the time trial is base on the pill draw when you go out anyways



sc lm race fan
May 22, 2016 at 02:46:57 PM
Joined: 01/27/2005
Posts: 411
Reply

I like time trials, they set the line ups. But I would get rid of heats with wing cars and add 10 laps to the mains. So the time trial lines up for the main. Heats 8 to 10 laps, dash 4 to 8 laps, so at your saturday night race track most run 10 lap heats on 1/4 to 3/8 mile and 8 laps on 1/2 mile. So running 10 more laps in a main is not adding any more laps a night. So the mains with a comp yellow 40 lap main, after 20 laps go into the pits, the other class(es) come out and run there other half of the main. Also you can fix your car no bring out a back up car though. When you come back out for the second half of the main you line up where you were running in the first part of the main and race the second 20 laps...




robertaltman
May 22, 2016 at 02:50:24 PM
Joined: 05/04/2015
Posts: 626
Reply

First the drivers, tracks and sanctioning groups like them and think it is the fairest way to line up . I don't mind them just they take most of the time to long to complete . I think they should time through warmups , alot more tracks are doing that .



doublenuthin
May 22, 2016 at 11:21:28 PM
Joined: 12/01/2004
Posts: 175
Reply

To AussiePosse fan, I've watched the dual heat format on my visits to Australia and generally there's a whole bunch of crashing. When they run the single heat format, everyone knows they won't get a second chance and race a whole lot cleaner. Do like it as a way to determine line ups, I don't like giving the guy who timed second but finished in the last transfer spot his time trial back in the heat. I kind of like the ASCS passing point format.



AussiePosseFan
May 23, 2016 at 02:29:31 PM
Joined: 01/13/2016
Posts: 10
Reply

To doublenuthin I like two rounds of heats as the fast guys start up front in the first round of heats and in the second round they start from the back making them try and pass cars. The reason I like that format is you get to see more racing for your money and yes sometimes you do see more crashes but that can be the exciting part. I don’t want to see anybody hurt but crashes can make it exciting especially for the kids. What I have heard and seen of the ASCS format it’s an improvement over most formats.




Eric Smith
May 23, 2016 at 05:27:55 PM
Joined: 11/29/2011
Posts: 244
Reply

I enjoy time trials. 

 

There has to be a fair and equitable way to line up heat and feature races.  How many of the "top" sprint car sanctioning bodies have time trials...?  There must be something to it if they all think it's the best way to do it.  ASCS lines up heats by draw, but lines up the feature by looking at a spreadsheet that assigns points based on positions started and finished in the heats.  That rewards cars for moving forward and rewards cars that start up front for staying up front.  Both of these methods give everyone a pretty equal chance at the feature.  In other words, the driver has all of the input in how the night goes.  It is in no way fair or equitable for a track or organization to do everything by random draw.  The driver gets zero fair or equitable chance at the night.  Random draw starting 10th in the heat and take top 4?  Good luck with that.  Straight to the back of the B you go.  Good luck with that too.  So as long as there is a fair way, I think it's fine.  Personally, I think time trials are the best.  "Passing points" are ok. Never seen double heats, but that sounds cool.  Random draw and take the top so many is damn near criminal. 


.  

race bannon
May 23, 2016 at 08:36:14 PM
Joined: 12/03/2004
Posts: 67
Reply

i don't like time trials, adds expense to car owners, laps to the track surface and time to the program. Draw for heat starting position and race for a feature transfer spot.

 



fiXXXer
May 23, 2016 at 08:54:06 PM
Joined: 10/26/2014
Posts: 2489
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: robertaltman on May 22 2016 at 02:50:24 PM

First the drivers, tracks and sanctioning groups like them and think it is the fairest way to line up . I don't mind them just they take most of the time to long to complete . I think they should time through warmups , alot more tracks are doing that .



That's all well and good until you're the poor unfortunate son of a bitch who gets stuck behind some windshield wiper and can't get a decent time because you were consumed with that task for your entire 2 laps. Group time trials suck. Every time Port Royal does it, someone ends up getting screwed by a slower car. It's every single time. 2 lap time trials, 1 car at a time. No need to reinvent the wheel. Those who don't like them are free to go do something else while time trials are going on. Me personally, I don't mind them. It's fun to watch.




oswald
May 23, 2016 at 09:21:52 PM
Joined: 11/30/2004
Posts: 1995
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: robertaltman on May 22 2016 at 02:50:24 PM

First the drivers, tracks and sanctioning groups like them and think it is the fairest way to line up . I don't mind them just they take most of the time to long to complete . I think they should time through warmups , alot more tracks are doing that .



Please list which tracks are currently time trialing 410 cars during hot laps  (warm ups)?



linbob
May 23, 2016 at 10:58:14 PM
Joined: 03/12/2011
Posts: 1655
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: brettco on May 22 2016 at 12:35:57 PM

 I don't think when the regular weekend racers are already strapped for finances that you should gain an advantage for having a stronger fresher engine.  At the outlaw level who cares but the outlaws also need the weekend racers to play along. Quick times are 90% engine. Timing 360s and 305s makes even less sense. That said now that most races don't even have enough cars for a B main it's a little too late to fix things.



This has been said numeress times, but at Knoxville 305 are timed in hot laps usually 6 cars at a time.  The 360 and 410s are timed with 3 cars at a time.  I am not sure, but when WOO come to town they will be timed 1 at a time the 410s





Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy