|
|
|
|
|
Topic: Why is there so much emphasis in time trials in 410 racing??
|
Email this topic to a friend |
Subscribe to this Topic
| Report this Topic to Moderator
|
|
Page 2 of 2 of 22 replies
|
|
|
|
|
May 24, 2016 at
09:28:46 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
11/29/2011
|
|
Posts:
|
244
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: race bannon on May 23 2016 at 08:36:14 PM
i don't like time trials, adds expense to car owners, laps to the track surface and time to the program. Draw for heat starting position and race for a feature transfer spot.
|
Is this from a fan's perspective that has no vested interest, or from someone paying bills that thinks a draw is somehow fair and equitable?
.
|
|
|
|
|
May 24, 2016 at
03:15:03 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
03/12/2011
|
|
Posts:
|
1655
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: Eric Smith on May 24 2016 at 09:28:46 AM
Is this from a fan's perspective that has no vested interest, or from someone paying bills that thinks a draw is somehow fair and equitable?
|
You would think a draw would average out but I know in our case we for 2 years in a row average in the 40 s. Then you see the point leaders draw front row starts.
|
|
|
|
|
May 25, 2016 at
08:27:57 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
11/29/2011
|
|
Posts:
|
244
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: linbob on May 24 2016 at 03:15:03 PM
You would think a draw would average out but I know in our case we for 2 years in a row average in the 40 s. Then you see the point leaders draw front row starts.
|
How many races are you winning from your 40 pill vs the guys who are drawing front row starts? I think it would be nice to see reporting from the random draw series that includes the draw. Then we can compare finishes to the random draw and have some empirical evidence that the draw is unfair or that the guys who start in the back of their heat are still winning races regularly.
.
|
|
|
