|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
11:14:16 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
06/20/2017
|
|
Posts:
|
498
|
|
|
This message was edited on
August 08, 2019 at
11:21:20 AM by Kingpin2014
Reply to:
Posted By: W2Motorsports on August 08 2019 at 10:53:36 AM
I just don't see how it is logical to start the quick timer in the heat outside of a transfer spot. Does that happen anywhere else? I see a lot of people saying we shouldn't make it easy on them, and they should have to prove they deserve to qualify but the problem is by making it hard on them you are making it easy on someone else. For every one of those top 10 who didn't make it someone who timed mid-pack got to start up front and fininsh top 4 in for the most part no passing heat races and meander their way into the feature. Schatz, Larson (or Dietrich, or the majority fo the remaining top 10 in TT) are right to say they got beat by the format. The biggest mistake Dietrich made last night was timing 4th, had he timed 15th (as Starks did) he likely would have had a much easier night, and if he had done in even better (by that I mean, timing worse) he may have got to start on the pole of the feature.
|
It happens at the Kings Royal. And it’s not making it easy on someone else because TT‘s are worth twice what heat races are worth, and then all the main lineups are by TT time. DD started 3rd in the B, all he had to do was hold his position. Instead he lost 2 spots and didn’t make it., if he would’ve made it, combined with his TT time all he would’ve needed was to crack the top 20 and he would’ve been in good shape (see Ian Madsen). DD just couldn’t get it done in the B despite starting in a transfer spot.
In the end, of the top 10, 7 of them qualified in the top 11, and only 1 was outside the top 20.
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
11:15:03 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
11/30/2004
|
|
Posts:
|
836
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: laudarevsonhunt on August 08 2019 at 10:38:27 AM
and qualifiers 32-40 all made the A main
|
Droud was the only front row starter that didn't make it and he had a breakdown or he would have made it easily.
|
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
11:21:34 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
05/31/2007
|
|
Posts:
|
4676
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: Kingpin2014 on August 08 2019 at 11:14:16 AM
It happens at the Kings Royal. And it’s not making it easy on someone else because TT‘s are worth twice what heat races are worth, and then all the main lineups are by TT time. DD started 3rd in the B, all he had to do was hold his position. Instead he lost 2 spots and didn’t make it., if he would’ve made it, combined with his TT time all he would’ve needed was to crack the top 20 and he would’ve been in good shape (see Ian Madsen). DD just couldn’t get it done in the B despite starting in a transfer spot.
In the end, of the top 10, 7 of them qualified in the top 11, and only 1 was outside the top 20.
|
Exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
11:34:46 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
05/03/2007
|
|
Posts:
|
1696
|
|
|
|
All these arguments about "so and so would have done better if they timed worse" are completely results oriented too. During time trials, there's no one who is able to predict how the track will react throughout the night. So yeah, if you want to sacrifice the points to get good track position in your heat, go ahead - but you better not hope the track doesn't widen out like it often does, because then you stand to lose more points and your track position with potentially faster cars starting behind you.
Christ, do you think 25K people flock to central Iowa every year because the format sucks? Donny Schatz must have insane luck to have the record he does in the last 10-15 years given the format is a crapshoot from I'm reading on here.
|
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
11:36:05 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
06/20/2017
|
|
Posts:
|
498
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: W2Motorsports on August 08 2019 at 10:53:36 AM
I just don't see how it is logical to start the quick timer in the heat outside of a transfer spot. Does that happen anywhere else? I see a lot of people saying we shouldn't make it easy on them, and they should have to prove they deserve to qualify but the problem is by making it hard on them you are making it easy on someone else. For every one of those top 10 who didn't make it someone who timed mid-pack got to start up front and fininsh top 4 in for the most part no passing heat races and meander their way into the feature. Schatz, Larson (or Dietrich, or the majority fo the remaining top 10 in TT) are right to say they got beat by the format. The biggest mistake Dietrich made last night was timing 4th, had he timed 15th (as Starks did) he likely would have had a much easier night, and if he had done in even better (by that I mean, timing worse) he may have got to start on the pole of the feature.
|
The example of him having a better night by TT slower only works if you make the invert in the feature. Had just a couple more of the faster guys made it through the heats you’d be starting 10th in the A and unless you moved significantly forward you’d be buried in points. Sure it worked for Starks, but he still went from 6 to 4 in the heat then 4 to 1 in the A, it’s not like he just won from the front row
|
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
11:57:50 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
07/29/2010
|
|
Posts:
|
807
|
|
|
|
35+ years and counting - format discussions still make my head spin
As per my recent rants, any inversion is better than no inversion.
It's rather interesting that 32-40 all made the A main. I'll never dissect it due to the aforementioned head spinning, but it is interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
12:50:21 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
11/08/2006
|
|
Posts:
|
232
|
|
|
|
I don't know or really care much about the format. I'm just happy to see Starks win. I've seen him a fair amount up here in the Pacific Northwest and I'm glad to see him win at Knoxville. Congratulations.
|
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
12:55:51 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
11/30/2004
|
|
Posts:
|
1404
|
|
|
|
To all you drunken fans......
May no one hear your cries.....
For at the Knoxville Nationals.......
The cream shall rise.
The end.
|
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
12:59:20 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
08/09/2018
|
|
Posts:
|
7
|
|
|
|
Ah time for the yearly format debate.....
While I agree with most that the cream always does rise to the top, there are nights like last night (and they always seem to be on Wednesday) where the track is really hooked up all night and there is never a lot of separation in speed between the top cars and not top cars, which leads to a lack of top TT cars making it into the A-Main. I have long said that since the weekly point total is so important, why not take the top 20 in points after the heats and line up the main. Invert however you want. This way the guys who timed good are rewarded for that, but also penalized for not making much headway in their heat. The points after the heats last night were as follows, and let you guys think about it:
1. Reutzel
2. I. Madsen
3. TK
4. McMahan
5. Bacon
6. Dietrich
7. Marks
8. G. Scelzi
9. Jeffrey
10. Schatz
11. Larson
12. Polyak
13. Starks
14. Henderson
15. K. Madsen
16. S. Haudenschild
17. Schuchart
18. D. Scelzi
19. McFadden
20. Thorson
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
01:22:48 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
07/24/2016
|
|
Posts:
|
1843
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: saphead on August 08 2019 at 10:45:54 AM
Maybe all the big dogs that couldn't get it done last night should ask Arron Reutzel for some advice.
|
That's a humbling comment that puts the night in perspective, although he is either hot or frozen, not much in between.
Even though I may not know you, I
care what most of you think!
|
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
02:12:26 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
03/02/2017
|
|
Posts:
|
292
|
|
|
This message was edited on
August 08, 2019 at
02:21:34 PM by W2Motorsports
Reply to:
I agree it should be hard.
Which is why I'm wondering why qualifying 23rd overall and finishing 3rd in your heat (after passing 1 car) rewards you with the pole in the feature?
After starting on the pole this same car dropped 3 positions to 4th (23rd overall, passed a total of -2 on the night) and is 11th in points.
Meanwhile, Kyle Larson as an example qualified 9th, started and finished 7th in his heat, started 7th in the B and finished 6th for a total of +1 on the night after qualifying 14 positions better than the above car. He sits 21st in points.
Brady Bacon (Timed 5th, -1 position on the night) 16th in points
Danny Dietrich (Timed 4th, net 0 positions on the night) 15th in points
The above is fine, as long as there are not several anomoly's -
Paige Polyak (Timed 14th, -15 on the night) 14th in points
Sheldon Haudenschild (Timed 18th, +1 position on the night) 7th in points
James McFadden (Timed 22nd, +1 position on the night) 8th in points
Those are just to name a few.
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
03:38:01 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
11/30/2004
|
|
Posts:
|
836
|
|
|
|
I hope you all see some good racing Friday and Satruday but I'm headed home after tonight. This is my 41st year and maybe my last. There are a few good races here and there but almost all the races used to be good, especially the heats. Somebody with loads of skill and daring would start 10th and win heats often "back in the day" but no longer. Every car out there is way too hooked up and the driver simply doesn't matter as much as he used to. The track should be a bit wider so keeping fingers crossed that we see a better show tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
04:42:16 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
05/03/2007
|
|
Posts:
|
1696
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: W2Motorsports on August 08 2019 at 02:12:26 PM
I agree it should be hard.
Which is why I'm wondering why qualifying 23rd overall and finishing 3rd in your heat (after passing 1 car) rewards you with the pole in the feature?
After starting on the pole this same car dropped 3 positions to 4th (23rd overall, passed a total of -2 on the night) and is 11th in points.
Meanwhile, Kyle Larson as an example qualified 9th, started and finished 7th in his heat, started 7th in the B and finished 6th for a total of +1 on the night after qualifying 14 positions better than the above car. He sits 21st in points.
Brady Bacon (Timed 5th, -1 position on the night) 16th in points
Danny Dietrich (Timed 4th, net 0 positions on the night) 15th in points
The above is fine, as long as there are not several anomoly's -
Paige Polyak (Timed 14th, -15 on the night) 14th in points
Sheldon Haudenschild (Timed 18th, +1 position on the night) 7th in points
James McFadden (Timed 22nd, +1 position on the night) 8th in points
Those are just to name a few.
|
Maybe we should just wipe the format clean and go straight up WoO style and kill the best sprint car event in the world. Or just give the 57 a promoter's provisional.
|
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
04:57:38 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
01/06/2009
|
|
Posts:
|
519
|
|
|
|
Some favorites struggle and it's the formats fault. Lol. Heard a good one leaving last night somebody complaining the track was garbage also. Lol. Pass some cars and they are fine.
|
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
05:06:58 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
07/21/2014
|
|
Posts:
|
12
|
|
|
|
I have been at just about every nationals since 1982. I love the format, but do agree that there are some nights like last night when it is probably too difficult for the faster cars starting 7th and 8th in their heats to make it to to the top 4 and transfer. Many have mentioned that all of the cars that timed 32nd - 40th made it into Wednesday night's A feature, but I don't think anyone mentioned that because of their slower times none of these cars had a mathematical chance to make Saturday's A feature lineup, at least not on their qualifying night. Thus while these nine cars got a bonus by getting an A feature start on their qualifying night, they had no chance of making Saturday's A main with their time. Time trials is by far the most important of the three phases of point accumulation at the Nationals. Not saying that I like or dislike that, but it is a fact.
Here is a crazy compromise idea: leave the format the same for the heat races, but yellow flag the field at the half way point of the field to bunch the cars up again. Then restart them. One of the issues I see is that the cars get strung out after about two laps and the race is just about settled at that point. Bunching the field up again would give the faster cars a better chance to move up to a transfer spot. I said it was crazy, but it would be a compromise between the two different groups going back and forth on this topic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
05:47:01 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
08/09/2018
|
|
Posts:
|
7
|
|
|
Reply to:
That's kind of the point with the disagreements.....the format rewarded those who were mid-pack qualifying. It happens one night just about every year. I would have no problem with a big dog going home, but multiple big dogs are on the outside looking in and all for the same reason. Granted, most of them will find their way into the A-main, but for the biggest race of the year, luck shouldn't be THIS big of a factor. And I know folks are saying "it's supposed to be hard" and I totally agree, but wouldn't hard be holding off all the big dogs for 50 laps to win the big check?
|
|
|
|
|
August 08, 2019 at
06:21:01 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
08/09/2018
|
|
Posts:
|
7
|
|
|
Reply to:
Agreed on the invert, but adding passing points would help.
|
|
|
|
|
August 09, 2019 at
08:58:47 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
11/23/2004
|
|
Posts:
|
3943
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: W2Motorsports on August 08 2019 at 02:12:26 PM
I agree it should be hard.
Which is why I'm wondering why qualifying 23rd overall and finishing 3rd in your heat (after passing 1 car) rewards you with the pole in the feature?
After starting on the pole this same car dropped 3 positions to 4th (23rd overall, passed a total of -2 on the night) and is 11th in points.
Meanwhile, Kyle Larson as an example qualified 9th, started and finished 7th in his heat, started 7th in the B and finished 6th for a total of +1 on the night after qualifying 14 positions better than the above car. He sits 21st in points.
Brady Bacon (Timed 5th, -1 position on the night) 16th in points
Danny Dietrich (Timed 4th, net 0 positions on the night) 15th in points
The above is fine, as long as there are not several anomoly's -
Paige Polyak (Timed 14th, -15 on the night) 14th in points
Sheldon Haudenschild (Timed 18th, +1 position on the night) 7th in points
James McFadden (Timed 22nd, +1 position on the night) 8th in points
Those are just to name a few.
|
The Invert as you are aware is 8. When the majority of those 8 don't transfer from their heats to the A-Main they just go to the next qualifier who did make it 9th and on down. It's all about transferring in your heat and then moving forward in the A. I hope yoou notice that most of your examples are now in the B for Saturday after the 2nd night of points are figured in. Don't jump the start and wait until after BOTH nights and you will get a much clearer picture. This Friday as the potential of 80 cars and I sure hope there is not that money, if there is I predict a one lap qualifying effort only. This could very well be a good night of racing but look for the cream to rise again, there are some stout cars in here.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 09, 2019 at
10:59:53 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
09/14/2010
|
|
Posts:
|
8046
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: W2Motorsports on August 08 2019 at 10:53:36 AM
I just don't see how it is logical to start the quick timer in the heat outside of a transfer spot. Does that happen anywhere else? I see a lot of people saying we shouldn't make it easy on them, and they should have to prove they deserve to qualify but the problem is by making it hard on them you are making it easy on someone else. For every one of those top 10 who didn't make it someone who timed mid-pack got to start up front and fininsh top 4 in for the most part no passing heat races and meander their way into the feature. Schatz, Larson (or Dietrich, or the majority fo the remaining top 10 in TT) are right to say they got beat by the format. The biggest mistake Dietrich made last night was timing 4th, had he timed 15th (as Starks did) he likely would have had a much easier night, and if he had done in even better (by that I mean, timing worse) he may have got to start on the pole of the feature.
|
That how I feel too
|
|
|
|
|
August 09, 2019 at
11:01:41 AM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
09/14/2010
|
|
Posts:
|
8046
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: W2Motorsports on August 08 2019 at 02:12:26 PM
I agree it should be hard.
Which is why I'm wondering why qualifying 23rd overall and finishing 3rd in your heat (after passing 1 car) rewards you with the pole in the feature?
After starting on the pole this same car dropped 3 positions to 4th (23rd overall, passed a total of -2 on the night) and is 11th in points.
Meanwhile, Kyle Larson as an example qualified 9th, started and finished 7th in his heat, started 7th in the B and finished 6th for a total of +1 on the night after qualifying 14 positions better than the above car. He sits 21st in points.
Brady Bacon (Timed 5th, -1 position on the night) 16th in points
Danny Dietrich (Timed 4th, net 0 positions on the night) 15th in points
The above is fine, as long as there are not several anomoly's -
Paige Polyak (Timed 14th, -15 on the night) 14th in points
Sheldon Haudenschild (Timed 18th, +1 position on the night) 7th in points
James McFadden (Timed 22nd, +1 position on the night) 8th in points
Those are just to name a few.
|
Good points
|
|
|