HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | RacersAuction.com | HoseheadsClassifieds.com
Hoosier Tire Great Plains | Hoosier Mid Atlantic | Racing Warehouse | Performance Race Parts | Xtreme Race Parts

Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead

Topic: Outlaws are on their Game
Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
First | Previous | Next | Last Reply 41 to 60 of 69
vande77
June 12, 2017 at 03:13:02 PM
Joined: 01/20/2005
Posts: 2079
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: IADIRT on June 12 2017 at 01:07:22 PM

Yes the leader starts the race on the double file but not in turn 3. If thats the case why not start off turn 2 to keep them guessing. Donny and Sweet were playing game and he caught him hanging back through three and just punched it. I dont blame him for trying but I felt it was a jump. If they don't call that back then Lynton shouldn't have got called back in his heat race. As I have stated on another thread though I still don't feel if either went opposite ways it changes the outcome of either race.



The heat race start should not have been called back, but that was a WoO call, not Doug Clark's.   For whatever reason they think the guy standing in turn #4 has the best view to see if someone jumped...

And they called it back because Pittman got a bad start by trying to play games with Lynton, not becuase Lynton jumped (he didn't).



IADIRT
June 12, 2017 at 03:22:35 PM
Joined: 04/29/2014
Posts: 1257
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: vande77 on June 12 2017 at 03:13:02 PM

The heat race start should not have been called back, but that was a WoO call, not Doug Clark's.   For whatever reason they think the guy standing in turn #4 has the best view to see if someone jumped...

And they called it back because Pittman got a bad start by trying to play games with Lynton, not becuase Lynton jumped (he didn't).



Agreed. I am not really all that upset about Schatz starts but more that Lyntons was called back when compared to others in the night. I certainly think Doug Clark needs to be the only one making  that call for the race but I'm sure they don't want to give that control up in the cases where the local officials may not be a competent as other venues. Certainly disappointed Knoxville couldn't shine better but on to weekly racing and crazy enough Nationals isn't really that far away.



revjimk
June 12, 2017 at 04:29:49 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 8048
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Nick14 on June 12 2017 at 01:12:52 PM

Another year another thread complaining about the format. I remember years ago people were complaining about guys sandbaging qualifying so that they qualified 13-16 to start upfront in the heat race to get into the dash, and guys were getting screwed over because you could qualify 6th but could start 15th because of the whole inversion and dash thing. Then they went to only heat race winners into the dash and the top 4 remaining qualifiers and and people still complained about that saying heat races and dash were pointless.

Then the i think a few years ago when the Outlaws were in some of the stronger regions of California, Ohio, Midwest, PA there were some nights where the "locals" swept the top 3 and everyone who hated the Outlaws got on all of the message boards talking about how much they sucked and they could not even get a driver in the top 3 or 5. This arguement was being made at the same time people were complaining that there was not a lot of passing in a 30 lap feature race or the leader was coming from the first 2 or 3 rows of a 30 lap feature race. Then they changed the format again and now you have where you qualify is where you start in the heat race, and where you finish (aside from the dash) is where you will start in the feature which means the heat races mean something now(and we still have complaining). Personally, I think the racing has been better since they went to the newer format as the challenging for position has been closer, and guys are still moving through the field.

Whether people want to admit it or not, the Outlaws are the best group of drivers in winged sprint car racing no matter what the format is. It is the goal for a lot of young up and coming drivers and was the goal for a lot of older drivers. A lot of local/regional teams have aspirations of running with the Outlaws full time and there may be drivers out there that are better than a couple members of the outlaws. But as a whole group, they are the best. They schedule about 90 races every season, more fans show up to their shows than a local, All Star, KWS, MOWA, or any other type of show. No matter what the format is, you will still have Outlaws winning races and people will still be complaining about how the format/rules are geared toward them.



I don't think anybody here (except a maybe few screwballs) contests the facts that Outlaws are the best. And unless you could start 24 cars side by side, all formats are imperfect

Lots of us just like to see the locals win & basically we're just shooting the breeze between races...

But on any given nite, WoO can be beaten, thats what makes it interesting

Go Posse!



blazer00
June 12, 2017 at 04:34:02 PM
Joined: 06/10/2015
Posts: 2420
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: egras on June 11 2017 at 10:51:45 PM

What a joke!!  I believe the point to J&J's post was "the outlaws are on their game"

 

This is followed up with rebuttals of "the fastest qualifiers start up front" and "they have higher quality cars"

 

(crickets)

 

That's the point of the post!!  They are on their game!!  Higher quality cars and faster qualifying times!!!  Holy $hit, is everybody brain dead?????????????     

Am I in favor of faster cars to the front of the heats?  No---I like action and passing.  But, while heat inverts are more entertaining to me--the selfish fan--they don't represent the cars that probably deserves to be in the front.  

Saying the WOO cars are only better  because of a format that puts the better cars up front is basically a paradox!!!!



"They" meaning who? That's what my thoughts turned to. It isn't the WoO that's on their game, it's a select few. Schatz has 10 wins, Gravel 8 wins, Sweet 4 wins......equals 22 wins. There are 10 WoO teams with 0 wins. Schuchart has 3 wins,  Stewart and Johnson have 2 each. Rico, Parker-Price Miller, Ian Madsen, Kerry Madsen and Brian Brown all have 1 win. I am tickled pink that Schuchart has 3 wins......what the hell could he do with a huge budget and the consistancy of fresh equipment? Beyond those top WoO teams, night in and night out there are local drivers around the country that can compete with the rest of the WoO roster. It really isn't that much different today than it's ever been. On the WoO tour at any given time over the years it's been the same, the dominance has been among 3-5 drivers tops, not the entire series roster. I have supported the WoO tour like thousands of fans in the form of tickets, caps, T's etc.......from day one, and I continue to  enjoy the show yet today. Having a more balanced field of cars or a more balanced way of lining up races is going to remain impossible. That's just the way it is.



dsc1600
June 12, 2017 at 04:39:57 PM
Joined: 05/31/2007
Posts: 4676
Reply

The WoO was a weaker group in retrospect in the early 2010s than at any other time in their history. 

You had some of the greatest of all time gettting older and losing a bit of what made them so dominant (King, Sammy, Dude), you had a guy at the top of his game up and leave full-time driving (Meyers) and you had some drivers who were in top notch equipment who perhaps didn't have the resume to deserve it (Darrah, perhaps even Mcmahan given how quick CJB has been w/ Gravel).

Now, you have Sweet who is finally getting good at all tracks, not just hammer down surfaces, Gravel, who finally has a steady ride and has shown awesome abilities, Pittman is having a down year but still can't count him out, Stewart, who has a few years with his team and is capable of winning almost anywhere, Jason Johnson who has some serious money behind him and is more of a threat than ever, and Logan, who on any given night can win. That's in addition to Schatz, who is probably on the Mt Rushmore of winged sprint car drivers all time. 

 



GTigers55
June 12, 2017 at 04:40:51 PM
Joined: 02/13/2017
Posts: 420
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: blazer00 on June 12 2017 at 04:34:02 PM

"They" meaning who? That's what my thoughts turned to. It isn't the WoO that's on their game, it's a select few. Schatz has 10 wins, Gravel 8 wins, Sweet 4 wins......equals 22 wins. There are 10 WoO teams with 0 wins. Schuchart has 3 wins,  Stewart and Johnson have 2 each. Rico, Parker-Price Miller, Ian Madsen, Kerry Madsen and Brian Brown all have 1 win. I am tickled pink that Schuchart has 3 wins......what the hell could he do with a huge budget and the consistancy of fresh equipment? Beyond those top WoO teams, night in and night out there are local drivers around the country that can compete with the rest of the WoO roster. It really isn't that much different today than it's ever been. On the WoO tour at any given time over the years it's been the same, the dominance has been among 3-5 drivers tops, not the entire series roster. I have supported the WoO tour like thousands of fans in the form of tickets, caps, T's etc.......from day one, and I continue to  enjoy the show yet today. Having a more balanced field of cars or a more balanced way of lining up races is going to remain impossible. That's just the way it is.



You bring up a good point about Schuhart. I wonder what he could do if he was at a top team like KKR, TSR, etc. That being said, do ya think Schuhart would leave shark racing if the oppurtunity presented himself? I honestly don't see him doing that. Shark racing has come a long way in the few years they've been on tour.



HoldenCaulfield
June 12, 2017 at 04:55:10 PM
Joined: 03/22/2008
Posts: 2532
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: GTigers55 on June 12 2017 at 04:40:51 PM

You bring up a good point about Schuhart. I wonder what he could do if he was at a top team like KKR, TSR, etc. That being said, do ya think Schuhart would leave shark racing if the oppurtunity presented himself? I honestly don't see him doing that. Shark racing has come a long way in the few years they've been on tour.



Of course he would. Big money rides don't come along often and a low budget driver would have to be a fool if they declined an opportunity to race on someone elses dime. You have to wonder how much longer that team will stay out there. When they went WOO, I believe it was said by Scruffy that they would do it for couple years or as long as they could afford to and the main reason was to get Logan and Jacob more national exposure to further their racing careers. They've competed well with what they have. That's for sure.


A

HoldenCaulfield
June 12, 2017 at 04:59:22 PM
Joined: 03/22/2008
Posts: 2532
Reply

WOO has been beat 4 times this year and the season isn't half over. Geez I remember a period back in the 80's and 90's where it was a huge upset if they got beat at all and it usually only happened at the Grove.


A

revjimk
June 12, 2017 at 05:18:24 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 8048
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: GTigers55 on June 12 2017 at 04:40:51 PM

You bring up a good point about Schuhart. I wonder what he could do if he was at a top team like KKR, TSR, etc. That being said, do ya think Schuhart would leave shark racing if the oppurtunity presented himself? I honestly don't see him doing that. Shark racing has come a long way in the few years they've been on tour.



As far as I'm concerned, Schuhart is still Posse!

Thats my take & I'm stickin' to it, not gonna argue, no logic involved....not trying to be objective



egras
June 12, 2017 at 09:41:46 PM
Joined: 08/16/2009
Posts: 4713
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: blazer00 on June 12 2017 at 04:34:02 PM

"They" meaning who? That's what my thoughts turned to. It isn't the WoO that's on their game, it's a select few. Schatz has 10 wins, Gravel 8 wins, Sweet 4 wins......equals 22 wins. There are 10 WoO teams with 0 wins. Schuchart has 3 wins,  Stewart and Johnson have 2 each. Rico, Parker-Price Miller, Ian Madsen, Kerry Madsen and Brian Brown all have 1 win. I am tickled pink that Schuchart has 3 wins......what the hell could he do with a huge budget and the consistancy of fresh equipment? Beyond those top WoO teams, night in and night out there are local drivers around the country that can compete with the rest of the WoO roster. It really isn't that much different today than it's ever been. On the WoO tour at any given time over the years it's been the same, the dominance has been among 3-5 drivers tops, not the entire series roster. I have supported the WoO tour like thousands of fans in the form of tickets, caps, T's etc.......from day one, and I continue to  enjoy the show yet today. Having a more balanced field of cars or a more balanced way of lining up races is going to remain impossible. That's just the way it is.



I don't know if you were trying to disagree with me or not?  But, I don't really disagree with anything you said.  I was just supporting J&J's post---the Outlaws--whether it is 3 or 10 of them---are cleaning up right now.   

Schuchart?  You aren't kidding!  Been impressed all year.  I was very impressed with his driving last weekend in Knoville.  Would love to see him in a big dollar ride.  (It might happen down the road too---who knows?)

All of that said, the main point you made?  "On the Woo tour at any given time over the years it's been the same"  True.  But, over the last few years the locals have been getting their shots in at them on a more consistent basis.  That is not the case this year.  There was no doubt on Friday and Saturday night who the top 3 cars in sprint car racing are right now!

Happy racing Blazer00



Dollanskyfan1.1
June 12, 2017 at 10:24:24 PM
Joined: 04/22/2006
Posts: 278
Reply

Were you there on Saturday? I was, and saw Schatz pass 5 or 6 cars by the exit of turn 2 in the dash. I am NOT a Schatz fan, but he can be amazing! So I think this thread is biased, the outlaws are suppose to be better than the "locals" night in and night out. Yes the locals do and can win, but "normally" the outlaws win!


The Crowd Pleaser IS THE BEST ever!

blazer00
June 12, 2017 at 10:48:45 PM
Joined: 06/10/2015
Posts: 2420
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: egras on June 12 2017 at 09:41:46 PM

I don't know if you were trying to disagree with me or not?  But, I don't really disagree with anything you said.  I was just supporting J&J's post---the Outlaws--whether it is 3 or 10 of them---are cleaning up right now.   

Schuchart?  You aren't kidding!  Been impressed all year.  I was very impressed with his driving last weekend in Knoville.  Would love to see him in a big dollar ride.  (It might happen down the road too---who knows?)

All of that said, the main point you made?  "On the Woo tour at any given time over the years it's been the same"  True.  But, over the last few years the locals have been getting their shots in at them on a more consistent basis.  That is not the case this year.  There was no doubt on Friday and Saturday night who the top 3 cars in sprint car racing are right now!

Happy racing Blazer00



No, not trying to disagree with you or J&J at all. Trying to clarify my thoughts on who was doing the actual dominating, and my opinion as to why. I do keep seeing posts referring to the thought that quite a few more drivers are winning WoO Features today during a season than in years past. Last year I took a look at those stats, using each season's top 20 drivers in points, and the averages over ten year periods since the beginning really hasn't flucuated more than a couple wins. If I recall correctly, I think the averages have consistantly been 11-12 different drivers each year in the course of each deacde. Of course there have been a couple years thrown in that have exceeded that, but on a ten year average it's been pretty consistant. The ten year period 2007-2016 (inside the top 20 in points) had an average of 12.1 different winners a year. I'm sure there were a couple years where a couple drivers outside the top ten won features, but I doubt enough to raise the avearge above 13 for the decade.  That's probably the case in other decades, also. My point is, again, not a lot has changed. Every year 3-5 drivers dominate, and a consistant number of drivers in total win WoO Features.



Johnny Gibson
June 13, 2017 at 12:32:33 AM
Joined: 12/02/2004
Posts: 461
Reply

From 2005-2016, WoO has averaged 19 different winners per year.  (Low of 16 in 2006, high of 24 in 2014.)  I didn't include preliminary wins from 2005-2007, which would've pushed the average to over 20.  From 1980-1989, WoO averaged 13 winners per year. (Lows of 11 in 1981 & 1984, and a high of 17 in 1980--again not including prelims.)



blazer00
June 13, 2017 at 07:06:04 AM
Joined: 06/10/2015
Posts: 2420
Reply

Thanks for clarifying the numbers for total winners each season. I had no idea as many as 11 drivers a season outside the top 20 in points won A Mains. As I stated, I was tallying numbers from the top 20 in ponits as posted by the WoO website. So that is a cool number to know. Still, the dominance every year is by a chosen 3-5 drivers with rare exception. And sometimes it was less.



blazer00
June 13, 2017 at 07:33:18 AM
Joined: 06/10/2015
Posts: 2420
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Johnny Gibson on June 13 2017 at 12:32:33 AM

From 2005-2016, WoO has averaged 19 different winners per year.  (Low of 16 in 2006, high of 24 in 2014.)  I didn't include preliminary wins from 2005-2007, which would've pushed the average to over 20.  From 1980-1989, WoO averaged 13 winners per year. (Lows of 11 in 1981 & 1984, and a high of 17 in 1980--again not including prelims.)



With a high of 24 different winners in 2014, that may explain why the format for lining up heats was changed to the fastest  qualifiers, rather than the invert that was being used.  It will be interesting to tabulate the number of different drivers winning A Mains each year now that the heads up format has been in place. 



egras
June 13, 2017 at 08:12:15 AM
Joined: 08/16/2009
Posts: 4713
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Dollanskyfan1.1 on June 12 2017 at 10:24:24 PM

Were you there on Saturday? I was, and saw Schatz pass 5 or 6 cars by the exit of turn 2 in the dash. I am NOT a Schatz fan, but he can be amazing! So I think this thread is biased, the outlaws are suppose to be better than the "locals" night in and night out. Yes the locals do and can win, but "normally" the outlaws win!



I was there and was sitting in turn 1.  My 13 year old son (who is also not a Schatz fan) turns to me after that move with a big smile on his face "holy crap dad".  Even I was forced to forget the number on the car for a second and just marvel in the move.  There was more than just horsepower the way he threaded the car through there.  

The only other time I clapped for Schatz was when he won the Nationals from the B.  Gotta give him his props.  I know, I know....he wouldn't have won it in the old days before it was 50 laps.  It wasn't the good ol days and the feature WAS 50 laps and he did it.  And it was very impressive.  

There, that's enough love for Schatz for one day.  Starting to feel icky!  :)



vande77
June 13, 2017 at 11:26:56 AM
Joined: 01/20/2005
Posts: 2079
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: egras on June 13 2017 at 08:12:15 AM

I was there and was sitting in turn 1.  My 13 year old son (who is also not a Schatz fan) turns to me after that move with a big smile on his face "holy crap dad".  Even I was forced to forget the number on the car for a second and just marvel in the move.  There was more than just horsepower the way he threaded the car through there.  

The only other time I clapped for Schatz was when he won the Nationals from the B.  Gotta give him his props.  I know, I know....he wouldn't have won it in the old days before it was 50 laps.  It wasn't the good ol days and the feature WAS 50 laps and he did it.  And it was very impressive.  

There, that's enough love for Schatz for one day.  Starting to feel icky!  Smile



Wasn't the year he ran the B the year he took the lead on lap 16?   Or was that the year he started around 15th or 16th? 

The guy has been unbelievable on the final night of the Nationals for nearly 15 years now.  I noticed a lot more cheers at Knoxville for him this past weekend than years prior. 



Nickules
June 13, 2017 at 11:44:00 AM
Joined: 08/05/2015
Posts: 1133
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: HoldenCaulfield on June 12 2017 at 04:55:10 PM

Of course he would. Big money rides don't come along often and a low budget driver would have to be a fool if they declined an opportunity to race on someone elses dime. You have to wonder how much longer that team will stay out there. When they went WOO, I believe it was said by Scruffy that they would do it for couple years or as long as they could afford to and the main reason was to get Logan and Jacob more national exposure to further their racing careers. They've competed well with what they have. That's for sure.



There was a rumor that a bigger money WoO team at least discussed with him the possibility of him leaving Shark Racing after last season and Logan basically said he is indebted to Scruffy for now and he was too loyal.  Now I believe there will be some movement this off season (and possibly some movement here in the next few weeks with one team in particular ;)) so I'm sure conversations will be had again.  Although there are plenty of deserving drivers who would jump at the chance, being up and down the road and understanding of the grind of the WoO would give Logan the advantage should a big money WoO team want a new driver.  There's going to be a point where Logan and Scruffy decide it's best for him to take the opportunity.  I'd say we're pretty close to that point - that if offered a WoO ride with a big money team the time is right for him to take it. 



Johnny Gibson
June 13, 2017 at 12:55:57 PM
Joined: 12/02/2004
Posts: 461
Reply

Last year (first year of straight up heats), we had 18 different A-main winners.  And again, the reason the format was changed was to make the heat races more meaningful.  At least now there is a reason to TRY to pass cars.  The fact is that passing in heat races (ESPECIALLY on bigger tracks) is difficult no matter how far back the "fast guys" start.  Cars are SO equal now that unless trafffic is involved where EVREYONE is in dirty air, cars out front and spaced out have an advantage. (Knoxville Nationals inverts 8 in the heat races, yet 7 of 10 heats on the preliminary nights last year were won from the front row.)  But drivers now make more of an effort knowing that a position gained in a heat is worth 3-4 spots in the A-main line up.  (It was tough doing dash draw interviews and hearing guys say "I knew I was in the dash based on my time, so when so-and-so stuck a nose under me, I just let him go.")  Transfer positions are also more meaningful now, since the Last Chance Showdown drivers now tag the A instead of potentially starting in row 5. 



egras
June 13, 2017 at 05:13:50 PM
Joined: 08/16/2009
Posts: 4713
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: vande77 on June 13 2017 at 11:26:56 AM

Wasn't the year he ran the B the year he took the lead on lap 16?   Or was that the year he started around 15th or 16th? 

The guy has been unbelievable on the final night of the Nationals for nearly 15 years now.  I noticed a lot more cheers at Knoxville for him this past weekend than years prior. 



I believe he took the lead shortly after the 1/2-way break the year he ran from the B.  The year he took the lead on about 15 or 16 was the year he had an engine fire on qualifying night but had enough point to start around 11th or so.  (I think anyways)



First | Previous | Next | Last Reply 41 to 60 of 69


Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login




 

If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2026 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy