HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | RacersAuction.com | HoseheadsClassifieds.com
Hoosier Tire Great Plains | Hoosier Mid Atlantic | Racing Warehouse | Performance Race Parts | Xtreme Race Parts

Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead

Topic: Couple questions for fans regarding drugs in Sprint Car racing
Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
First | Previous | Next | Last Reply 21 to 40 of 189
SamHerring14
November 24, 2014 at 10:56:44 PM
Joined: 05/23/2014
Posts: 317
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: oswald on November 24 2014 at 10:37:32 PM

Testing 3 drivers per night you would not test all the drivers at Knoxville in 1 season. You may end up testing all but the 1 that is using! And if a driver should test positive he will get a lawyer and the track/sanction will have to prove his sample was not contaminated or mixed up with anouther between the track and the lab. More expense for the track/sanction. 

I can give you a clean sample then turn and go into my truck/trailer and snort a line of coke. So with your testing you still have a guy racing who is high!!

 

But the biggest problem is .... unless you can get the test results BEFORE the races start the guy who's sample is positive for drugs will race that night and may cause the fatality we all dread! Bang, anouther big lawsuit! The biggest effect of drug testing sprint car racers will be to make some lawyers a lot of money.

 

How are you going to test all the entries for the Knoville Nationals in time to get the results back before they race?

 

Lot and lots of problems trying to do this. The NFL has a lot of problems and has had lawsuits over their testing and they are a much more confined group with signed contracts and personal conduct policies in place. Nascar only has a certain number of drivers to contend with. With out a national policy enforced equaly at all tracks this would just be a huge can of worms. And the WoO has not shown a desire to lead and make decisions or policy so who will put the effort together nationaly!



i beleive Australia does a saliva test. Only takes 10 minutes for results. Can we be proactive on an issue just once? 



kossuth
November 24, 2014 at 11:05:58 PM
Joined: 11/02/2013
Posts: 539
Reply
This message was edited on November 24, 2014 at 11:15:27 PM by kossuth
Reply to:
Posted By: oswald on November 24 2014 at 07:37:22 PM

People are hurt and killed every day by drivers that are drunk or on drugs on the highways of our country! Shoud we all be drug tested regularly in order to have a drivers license?



In most states if you cause and are deemed initially at fault for a fatal accident you can bet you will be tested by the police. Reason why there is no random tests for motor vehicles?  Difference between a racecar and a street vehicle is say about 700 hp and 100 mph. Big difference here. 

Most trucking companies randomly test their drivers due to liability.  A 80,000 lbs truck and 900 hp racecar is way different then a passenger car  

 



dirtdevil
November 24, 2014 at 11:15:56 PM
Joined: 09/30/2005
Posts: 1387
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: oswald on November 24 2014 at 07:33:05 PM

With money being tight for promoters, track owners and a lot of race teams perhaps a good question would be .... Who is going to pay for the testing if it is done? Labs do not do blood or pee tests for free. It is easy to say testing is needed but someone needs to figure out where the money to do it is going to come from first.

How much would it cost Knoxville Raceway to test 80 drivers? 

 

Or say all drivers must bring a clean test with them to be allowed to race? Then how do you know no cheating was done? NFL players have used masking agents to pass blood tests. 

 

Before I could say yes it should be done I would need to know how it would be done. Random? Every driver x# of times per season? Just WoO drivers or all that race with them? All drivers at the major sprint car tracks and series? Draw blood or take a pee sample at the track? Drivers required to have it done on their own by a doctor and lab chosen by the track or sanctioning body?

 

Once you say sprint car racers need to be drug tested there are a whole lot of other questions to be answered too! I sure hope your 5 part series covers some of the other issues involed here than just should it be done, is it needed and how to penalize those that fail a drug test.

 

 




as a fan and driver I wouldnt have a problem with the added cost for random testing, a crew member of mine is a medical technologist, to my understanding,  tests utilized to decifer the common drugs used today are fairly inexpesive, mind you in a lab there is many many other tests that are complex and expensive, the equipment used makes many of these as a huge cost only the insured can afford, anyhow, were racing $ 20-30-60k machines , sure incident does happen and i would rather leave incident to strong competition and fate, not mind and reflex altering poor decisions, unfortunatly the media has gotten its hands in our sport in a direction we wish it would be reversed lately, all the negitives have been braut forth in the events a talented man that is passionate about sprint racing has endured the past two seasons, TS has given to the sport more than he has taken, its sad the events he has underwent the past couple seasons and in my mind he is just doing what he truely loves, racing sprintcars.. with his high profile, no rock goes unturned,he is continueously scutinized ,and cratqued , everyone has a opinion to his status and where abouts, and god forbid something in this sport goes wrong, nothing has changed in this sport, it's still dangerous, but a mind altering drug that takes ones motive and reactions to its limits is not nessessary when the heat of the moment needs to have strong minds and well thought behavior, random testing may not catch everyone, the idea is its present and the recoil s to not abiding by it , you cant control everything, but, putting a cap on the issue my lessen the chances of its ugly facts of showing up soon again.



kossuth
November 25, 2014 at 04:47:44 AM
Joined: 11/02/2013
Posts: 539
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Hawker on November 24 2014 at 09:15:30 PM

Playing the devil's advocate....How would you enforce it in states with medical marijuana laws? Or drivers/crew members who are residents of Washington or Colorado?



The short of it is that racing is a voluntary event and the event manager can dictate what they wish.  



Shortie12
MyWebsite
November 25, 2014 at 06:19:52 AM
Joined: 12/11/2008
Posts: 837
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: kossuth on November 25 2014 at 04:47:44 AM

The short of it is that racing is a voluntary event and the event manager can dictate what they wish.  



Its somewhat like traction control no one uses so no need to check.We will hear plenty when and if anything happens[ I hope it doesnt] in the Ward death.



maddog53
November 25, 2014 at 06:50:16 AM
Joined: 03/18/2008
Posts: 1516
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Hawker on November 24 2014 at 09:15:30 PM

Playing the devil's advocate....How would you enforce it in states with medical marijuana laws? Or drivers/crew members who are residents of Washington or Colorado?



Pot may be legal in those States, but you still cannot go out and drive while intoxicaed.  Just like alcohol.  If it is in your system and you get in an accident, you are busted.   You test for the State that you are in.  If you are in PA and you are from Colorado, you follow the laws of the state you are in.



D1RT
November 25, 2014 at 06:51:37 AM
Joined: 11/28/2007
Posts: 258
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Hawker on November 24 2014 at 09:15:30 PM

Playing the devil's advocate....How would you enforce it in states with medical marijuana laws? Or drivers/crew members who are residents of Washington or Colorado?



The same way it is done in my industry. 

Our fitness for duty program states " even though some States have legalized marijuana for medical and recreational use it is still a banned substance under our fitness for duty rules and regulations and will result in immeadiate termination if test results are positive".

Plus marijuana is still illegal under Federal law no matter what the States pass.



jwerkman
November 25, 2014 at 08:45:31 AM
Joined: 11/08/2006
Posts: 540
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: IBRACN on November 24 2014 at 08:34:44 PM

I'm in favor of mandatory drug testing in sprint car racing.  Most, if not all of the WoO drivers, want it and think it is time.  

 

the penalty could be from 1 race to months Depending on the policy set up.  An example....First offense, weekly testing and as long as the numbers continue to decrease (working itself out of the system), all is ok.  Seek a drug counciler for help, short suspension.  Second offense, longer suspension, more drug counciling.  Third offense, longer suspension, if not permanent.  Kind of like a three strike policy similar to NASCAR.

 

It doesn't cost as much as one might think. It cost $28.00 to test for all street drugs and synthetic drugs.  You don't have to test everyone every night.  What one could do is test 4-6-8 people each night of racing.  Maybe 3 drivers and three crew members...or three local drivers and three WoO (replace organization name here) each night.  That way it minimizes cost to the track/organization and deters every driver from taking drugs on the chance they might be tested.  Cost each night would be anywhere from $125.00 to $$250.00 each night of racing, depending on how many people you would want to test.  Now, I'm aware some things may need to be tweaked but this plan could/would work at minimal expense to the track/organization.

 

This is just one possibility.....My 2 cents worth.  



THE COST IS NOT THAT CHEAP, I WORK FOR A TRUCKING COMPANY AND IT COST'S US BETWEEN $125 TO $150 PER TEST. AND THE RESULTS ARE AT LEAST 2 DAYS OUT. NOW THERE ARE THE SWABS YOU CAN USE AND IF I AM RIGHT THEY ONLY CHECK FOR THE HARD STUFF AND THE REUKTS ARE RIGHT AWAY, BUT I DO NOT KNOW THE COST OF THEM. ALLCHOL TESTING WOULD BE EASY EVERYONE BLOWS WHEN THEY CK IN, I AM SURE THE COST OF A MACHINE IS HIGH BUT THERE MAYBE CHEAPER ONES OUT THERE THAT DO THE SAME JOB. JUST AN INSIGHT FROM THE TRUCKING INDUSTRY

 


 

IBRACN
MyWebsite
November 25, 2014 at 10:03:21 AM
Joined: 11/26/2004
Posts: 1001
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: jwerkman on November 25 2014 at 08:45:31 AM

THE COST IS NOT THAT CHEAP, I WORK FOR A TRUCKING COMPANY AND IT COST'S US BETWEEN $125 TO $150 PER TEST. AND THE RESULTS ARE AT LEAST 2 DAYS OUT. NOW THERE ARE THE SWABS YOU CAN USE AND IF I AM RIGHT THEY ONLY CHECK FOR THE HARD STUFF AND THE REUKTS ARE RIGHT AWAY, BUT I DO NOT KNOW THE COST OF THEM. ALLCHOL TESTING WOULD BE EASY EVERYONE BLOWS WHEN THEY CK IN, I AM SURE THE COST OF A MACHINE IS HIGH BUT THERE MAYBE CHEAPER ONES OUT THERE THAT DO THE SAME JOB. JUST AN INSIGHT FROM THE TRUCKING INDUSTRY

 



I drug test daily and they are just that cheap...if your trucking company is paying that price for a drug test then they had better find a new company to use.  Now if you add in a steroid test, the price goes up.  $28.00 is what we pay for each drug test and like I said above, it tests for all street drugs as well as synthetic drugs.  Now the drug test kit (a plastic cup and 2 plastic containers that the urine gets poured into and seald that is sent into the lab which is in Tennessee) would add a little price to the test but not much.


www.ibracn.com
#PaulsToTheWall
GO SAMMY!

StaggerLee
MyWebsite
November 25, 2014 at 10:42:22 AM
Joined: 05/14/2014
Posts: 645
Reply


Drug testing is only needed if a problem exists. Are those in favor of drug testing saying that they know for sure drugs are an issue among Sprincar drivers? Or is this just an assumption based on a couple bad apples? When was the last time drugs were an issue in a sprintcar racing incident AT THE TRACK? Please dont say Kevin Ward Jr. because Marijuana had zero to do with that incident, yes it may have been in his system, but aparently he wasnt too impared to race a 700 hp sprintcar and battle with one of the best ever, if thats what marijauna does to a driver they should all smoke (no pun intended).  Of all of the recent horrible on track fatalities (Kreamer williamson, Leffler) has drugs been an issue with any of them? Dont try to fix somthing thats not broken, unless someone is visably intoxicated or someone witnesses them drinking or using in the pits before a race, I think drug testing is an invasion of privacy and should be kept out of Sprintcar racing.

 Ibracin claimes all the Woo drivers are in favor of drug testing, what would you say if you were a casual pot smoker on the Woo tour and were asked about drug testing? Of course your gonna say your in favor so you dont look like a possible drug user. Why would you need to test a crew member? These guys dont have a right to privacy about what they put in their bodies because they work on a sprint car? Thats rediculous, what ever happened to our right to privacy?  Be careful what you wish for, maybe they will start to drug test fans as they come through the gate to make sure they dont hurt another fan while under the influence, and ban beer drinking at tracks, because those drunks could kill someone on the way home from the track. where does it end folks?



SamHerring14
November 25, 2014 at 11:02:43 AM
Joined: 05/23/2014
Posts: 317
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: StaggerLee on November 25 2014 at 10:42:22 AM


Drug testing is only needed if a problem exists. Are those in favor of drug testing saying that they know for sure drugs are an issue among Sprincar drivers? Or is this just an assumption based on a couple bad apples? When was the last time drugs were an issue in a sprintcar racing incident AT THE TRACK? Please dont say Kevin Ward Jr. because Marijuana had zero to do with that incident, yes it may have been in his system, but aparently he wasnt too impared to race a 700 hp sprintcar and battle with one of the best ever, if thats what marijauna does to a driver they should all smoke (no pun intended).  Of all of the recent horrible on track fatalities (Kreamer williamson, Leffler) has drugs been an issue with any of them? Dont try to fix somthing thats not broken, unless someone is visably intoxicated or someone witnesses them drinking or using in the pits before a race, I think drug testing is an invasion of privacy and should be kept out of Sprintcar racing.

 Ibracin claimes all the Woo drivers are in favor of drug testing, what would you say if you were a casual pot smoker on the Woo tour and were asked about drug testing? Of course your gonna say your in favor so you dont look like a possible drug user. Why would you need to test a crew member? These guys dont have a right to privacy about what they put in their bodies because they work on a sprint car? Thats rediculous, what ever happened to our right to privacy?  Be careful what you wish for, maybe they will start to drug test fans as they come through the gate to make sure they dont hurt another fan while under the influence, and ban beer drinking at tracks, because those drunks could kill someone on the way home from the track. where does it end folks?



Is there a problem? Who knows? It's to set a precedent that we won't take drugs in our sport. It's no wonder the sport hasn't progressed if people think it's okay in today's society that racing under the influence would be okay. Is this the same logic with our outdated venues? " well they aren't broken, so don't do any improvements " 



SamHerring14
November 25, 2014 at 11:06:05 AM
Joined: 05/23/2014
Posts: 317
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: StaggerLee on November 25 2014 at 10:42:22 AM


Drug testing is only needed if a problem exists. Are those in favor of drug testing saying that they know for sure drugs are an issue among Sprincar drivers? Or is this just an assumption based on a couple bad apples? When was the last time drugs were an issue in a sprintcar racing incident AT THE TRACK? Please dont say Kevin Ward Jr. because Marijuana had zero to do with that incident, yes it may have been in his system, but aparently he wasnt too impared to race a 700 hp sprintcar and battle with one of the best ever, if thats what marijauna does to a driver they should all smoke (no pun intended).  Of all of the recent horrible on track fatalities (Kreamer williamson, Leffler) has drugs been an issue with any of them? Dont try to fix somthing thats not broken, unless someone is visably intoxicated or someone witnesses them drinking or using in the pits before a race, I think drug testing is an invasion of privacy and should be kept out of Sprintcar racing.

 Ibracin claimes all the Woo drivers are in favor of drug testing, what would you say if you were a casual pot smoker on the Woo tour and were asked about drug testing? Of course your gonna say your in favor so you dont look like a possible drug user. Why would you need to test a crew member? These guys dont have a right to privacy about what they put in their bodies because they work on a sprint car? Thats rediculous, what ever happened to our right to privacy?  Be careful what you wish for, maybe they will start to drug test fans as they come through the gate to make sure they dont hurt another fan while under the influence, and ban beer drinking at tracks, because those drunks could kill someone on the way home from the track. where does it end folks?



The Ward incident wouldn't have happened if he was stopped! It was more bad light shed on out sport that wasn't needed, when we are trying to entice sponsors to the sport not scare them away! 



maddog53
November 25, 2014 at 11:24:00 AM
Joined: 03/18/2008
Posts: 1516
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: SamHerring14 on November 25 2014 at 11:06:05 AM

The Ward incident wouldn't have happened if he was stopped! It was more bad light shed on out sport that wasn't needed, when we are trying to entice sponsors to the sport not scare them away! 



The right to privacy does not apply when it is ILLEGAL, except for a few places.  It is still ILLEGAL to be under the influence when driving...ANYTHING.......EVERYWHERE.  Don't give me this crap about POT staying in your system for 28 days.  That is the law, and it is unfortunate for some that imbibe but it is what you signed up for when you drive.....



JonR
November 25, 2014 at 12:22:24 PM
Joined: 05/28/2008
Posts: 899
Reply

I am not sure why we care about the crew members.   I don't think there is a reason to incur that cost or overhead for the track owner/promoter.   If the driver is concerned about his crew, he should address it.   

 



BigRightRear
November 25, 2014 at 12:29:17 PM
Joined: 11/27/2004
Posts: 3751
Reply

forgetting to tighen a RR...a metal wheel cover and anything else that might take flight might a good reason for a crew member to be on his game...just sayin.

I am guessing the lazy "dont do anything until someone gets killed" remedy will be applied and the lawyers will sit waiting...

 


Lincoln 1845 ft/.35 mile T1=118MPH 
Eldora 2287 ft/.43mile T3=135MPH
Port 2716 ft/.51 mile T3=TBD
Grove 2792 ft/.53 mile T3=135MPH
Selinsgrove 2847 ft/.54 mile T1=136MPH
"I didn't move to PA from El Paso in search of better 
weather." Van May

oswald
November 25, 2014 at 02:18:02 PM
Joined: 11/30/2004
Posts: 2010
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: IBRACN on November 24 2014 at 10:45:45 PM

The threat of the random test deters the participants from using.  You don't have to test all of them but the threat that it could be done will deter most (probably not all) from using.  You test before, during, and after the night of racing.  The unpredictability of he test keeps the deterrent effective all night long.  There are ways around every rule/policy but having no policy make drug use in auto racing to easy.



Seems the threat of a random test does not work well in the NFL as a lot still get caught. And a suspension for them costs the player hundreds of thousands of dollars. 

If you have a drug testing policy a lawyer will say that proves you know there is a drug problem in your sport. Then the guy who causes an injury or fatality is one who had not been tested. There will be a lawsuit!

 

Why did tracks not make safety improvements after the Wolfgang lawsuit? Because making changes to their safety fences or fire protection would be seen by lawyers as a admission that you knew they were not good enough but you did not care till a track lost a lawsuit.Giving anyone injured before the improvements a dasis for a lawsuit.

This is America, where lawyers have TV adds that say they will sue on your behalf and if they lose you owe them nothing.



Hawker
MyWebsite
November 25, 2014 at 03:18:47 PM
Joined: 11/23/2004
Posts: 2831
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: IBRACN on November 25 2014 at 10:03:21 AM

I drug test daily and they are just that cheap...if your trucking company is paying that price for a drug test then they had better find a new company to use.  Now if you add in a steroid test, the price goes up.  $28.00 is what we pay for each drug test and like I said above, it tests for all street drugs as well as synthetic drugs.  Now the drug test kit (a plastic cup and 2 plastic containers that the urine gets poured into and seald that is sent into the lab which is in Tennessee) would add a little price to the test but not much.



It's not that simple...Anything under the Department of Transportation...Trucking...Railway...Aviation (my industry) etc., requires a split sample and to be tested to more stringent standards...


Member of this message board since 1997

henry chinaski
November 25, 2014 at 03:44:29 PM
Joined: 04/18/2008
Posts: 1267
Reply

Enough already with all this stupid drug testing talk. Sprint car racing is fine as it is. We dont need more regulations in this sport! The crap that was spread about Ward having cannabis in his system DOES NOT prove he was high that day AT ALL! Thats the god damned problem with all this drug testing non sense. You're going to expose a driver that you like ( I can guarantee there will be more than few) to a drug test that won't prove they're currently under the influence of cannabis but the test can still show residual levels from weeks before. Is this is the shitty world you idiots want to live in??? Good grief get another damn hobby and leave this sport alone.


Cheers!

SprintFan16
MyWebsite
November 25, 2014 at 03:48:57 PM
Joined: 05/03/2007
Posts: 1698
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: henry chinaski on November 25 2014 at 03:44:29 PM

Enough already with all this stupid drug testing talk. Sprint car racing is fine as it is. We dont need more regulations in this sport! The crap that was spread about Ward having cannabis in his system DOES NOT prove he was high that day AT ALL! Thats the god damned problem with all this drug testing non sense. You're going to expose a driver that you like ( I can guarantee there will be more than few) to a drug test that won't prove they're currently under the influence of cannabis but the test can still show residual levels from weeks before. Is this is the shitty world you idiots want to live in??? Good grief get another damn hobby and leave this sport alone.



So would you prefer to turn a blind eye and hope for the best? Because that's how you get this sport ripped apart. 



Hawker
MyWebsite
November 25, 2014 at 03:51:25 PM
Joined: 11/23/2004
Posts: 2831
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: henry chinaski on November 25 2014 at 03:44:29 PM

Enough already with all this stupid drug testing talk. Sprint car racing is fine as it is. We dont need more regulations in this sport! The crap that was spread about Ward having cannabis in his system DOES NOT prove he was high that day AT ALL! Thats the god damned problem with all this drug testing non sense. You're going to expose a driver that you like ( I can guarantee there will be more than few) to a drug test that won't prove they're currently under the influence of cannabis but the test can still show residual levels from weeks before. Is this is the shitty world you idiots want to live in??? Good grief get another damn hobby and leave this sport alone.



You are wrong.....Drug testing of yesteryear was a yea/nay test. They have it down to a gnats ass now and can differentiate between imparement and traces...


Member of this message board since 1997

First | Previous | Next | Last Reply 21 to 40 of 189


Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login




 

If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2026 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy