HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | RacersAuction.com | HoseheadsClassifieds.com
Hoosier Tire Great Plains | Hoosier Mid Atlantic | Racing Warehouse | Performance Race Parts | Xtreme Race Parts

Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead

Topic: WoO engine specs
Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
First | Previous | Next | Last Reply 21 to 30 of 30
Speedkills
MyWebsite
April 25, 2012 at 08:58:06 PM
Joined: 02/09/2012
Posts: 863
Reply

I agree that its hard to say whether those dyno #s are correct or maybe embellished a bit, about like gas mileage stickers on new vehicles. It would be interesting to know if the buyer of the motor ever has them independently tested or if thats always on the builders dyno.

As far as Knoxville last year I think the lower than normal temps and not being as humid and heavy of air as they normally get in Kville for the nationals made a big difference in the power they were getting out of those motors. And along with that extra power comes running the motors more on the edge and therefore more possibility of blowups.


http://gph.is/XMLGff

henry chinaski
April 26, 2012 at 03:16:40 AM
Joined: 04/18/2008
Posts: 1267
Reply
This message was edited on April 26, 2012 at 03:18:25 AM by henry chinaski
Reply to:
Posted By: Speedkills on April 25 2012 at 08:58:06 PM

I agree that its hard to say whether those dyno #s are correct or maybe embellished a bit, about like gas mileage stickers on new vehicles. It would be interesting to know if the buyer of the motor ever has them independently tested or if thats always on the builders dyno.

As far as Knoxville last year I think the lower than normal temps and not being as humid and heavy of air as they normally get in Kville for the nationals made a big difference in the power they were getting out of those motors. And along with that extra power comes running the motors more on the edge and therefore more possibility of blowups.



Your correct that cool temps aided horsepower production along with less humidity. The part about humid air being heavy is incorrect though. It seems counter intuitive but humid air is actually less dense than dry, it feels heavier but technically speaking (and to a motor) it isnt. Best conditions for horsepower is sea level cool dry air. That's a fact. Not trying to be a smart ass but its a thing I hear wrongly stated all the time. Pilots know that humid air creates less lift.
Cheers!

Wesmar
April 26, 2012 at 07:10:20 AM
Joined: 09/29/2005
Posts: 631
Reply
This message was edited on April 26, 2012 at 07:12:19 AM by Wesmar
Reply to:
Posted By: henry chinaski on April 26 2012 at 03:16:40 AM
Your correct that cool temps aided horsepower production along with less humidity. The part about humid air being heavy is incorrect though. It seems counter intuitive but humid air is actually less dense than dry, it feels heavier but technically speaking (and to a motor) it isnt. Best conditions for horsepower is sea level cool dry air. That's a fact. Not trying to be a smart ass but its a thing I hear wrongly stated all the time. Pilots know that humid air creates less lift.


Very interesting discussion and dyno numbers as well. Keep on I like reading this stuff

minthess
MyWebsite
April 26, 2012 at 02:03:35 PM
Joined: 12/09/2008
Posts: 2403
Reply
This message was edited on April 26, 2012 at 02:21:13 PM by minthess
I guess there would be only 2 millionaire car owners left instead of 3 if we went to something remotely truly outlaw.
Luna's Ford engine style that won 2 WoO titles and 3 
Kings Royals before a weight rule against the best EVER
in their prime and now DOMINATES super dirt late model
racing is no longer allowed/wanted in a WoO sprint
car.... Was Luna a miracle worker?

dirtdevil
April 26, 2012 at 03:09:46 PM
Joined: 09/30/2005
Posts: 1387
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: linbob on April 25 2012 at 06:42:38 PM

I would like to see all of these 950 HP engines taken to one dyno and see wat they really produce. I have also heard of 360 engines with 750 HP. I think part of it is a psych. job to make every one elso think that your engine is so great we do not have a chance.



Hence the invalidity of (mines got more ponies than yours theory) the fluctuation from one dyno to the next (in my world) is rather huge, dyno numbers are great and obviously quite interesting, it makes one notice where the most bang for the buck is and items worthy of use, honestly, A dyno's use is mainly for a engine producing maximum power without destroying anything through its targeted cycle before freshening , thier use for a typical racer means keep it fueled correct and happy , granted in all competition the margin for catastrophie will be pushed to the limit, I remember when a good ascs 360 was 625 ish range , with todays inovations in injection, headers, cams and ignition I dont see it unobtainable hitting 680, why not? when you add up 10-7-6 hp increases here and there, its right on the money, and fueld to kill? heck, it'll impress you when a motor goes into Kamakazzie mode.. the real question here is, how much HP can it make for how long?



Driver For Awhile
April 26, 2012 at 04:46:06 PM
Joined: 12/14/2009
Posts: 18
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Cobra on April 25 2012 at 08:50:06 PM

Once upon a time a good 410 engine would spin to 8000 rpm, I believe they are now turning them over 9000rpm hence the increase in HP.

 

 



9000 rpms thats funny, most 410 motors peak around 7200-7500 rpm and the run around 8000-8300 rpms.

Anything over that is most likely wheel spin, you can take the same motor and gear with different drivers and get as much as 300-400 rpms different between the two



Cobra
April 26, 2012 at 08:33:08 PM
Joined: 12/04/2004
Posts: 155
Reply

Rahmers billet block that was outlawed was the first engine that I heard had over 900HP and spun over 9K rpm..

The 900hp is not that hard to believe,,, and with the lightening of the valve train over the years, 9k is surely on the cards.

 

Even the "cheaper" 358's are now turing over 8K



MoOpenwheel
April 26, 2012 at 09:38:02 PM
Joined: 07/27/2005
Posts: 669
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Wesmar on April 26 2012 at 07:10:20 AM
Very interesting discussion and dyno numbers as well. Keep on I like reading this stuff


Lol at Kelly. :)

dirtdevil
April 26, 2012 at 10:13:17 PM
Joined: 09/30/2005
Posts: 1387
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Wesmar on April 26 2012 at 07:10:20 AM
Very interesting discussion and dyno numbers as well. Keep on I like reading this stuff


well Kelly, maybe you can put some death to a portion of this debate?, what % of your mills do you still utilize a rev kit? what portion still use a rocker stud and girdle type configuration? , I remember back when a stud girdle and rev kit ment you had some nice stuff and spinning rather large rpm, now the valve train has went on a diet and most (obviously) use a rocker shaft style assembly , I cant familiarize myself with the 358's but to my understanding the iron headed motors are becoming just as bad ass as a 360? I dont think most the figures are too far off HP wise , forgive me for kickn the 950 # out there, but anybody willing to brag about "our" sport tends to streach the #'s a little, afterall, most new comers dont care anyway thier still fast,, Although, nobody likes to let the cat outa the bag , is it me or is there a big white elephant in the room?



Wesmar
April 26, 2012 at 11:24:00 PM
Joined: 09/29/2005
Posts: 631
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: dirtdevil on April 26 2012 at 10:13:17 PM

well Kelly, maybe you can put some death to a portion of this debate?, what % of your mills do you still utilize a rev kit? what portion still use a rocker stud and girdle type configuration? , I remember back when a stud girdle and rev kit ment you had some nice stuff and spinning rather large rpm, now the valve train has went on a diet and most (obviously) use a rocker shaft style assembly , I cant familiarize myself with the 358's but to my understanding the iron headed motors are becoming just as bad ass as a 360? I dont think most the figures are too far off HP wise , forgive me for kickn the 950 # out there, but anybody willing to brag about "our" sport tends to streach the #'s a little, afterall, most new comers dont care anyway thier still fast,, Although, nobody likes to let the cat outa the bag , is it me or is there a big white elephant in the room?



I will do my best to answer questions. We haven't used stud girdles, rev kits, or stud rockers for years. I'm not sure about 950 hp for a 410 sprint car engine, that's pretty stout. But there might be.

First | Previous | Next | Last Reply 21 to 30 of 30


Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login




 

If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2026 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy