|
|
Topic: Knoxville Saturday night random thoughts
|
Email this topic to a friend |
Subscribe to this Topic
| Report this Topic to Moderator
|
Page 2 of 2 of 33 replies
|
|
|
August 12, 2014 at
10:01:51 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
12/09/2004
|
Posts:
|
339
|
|
|
A 410 will use about 950 pounds per hour of fuel on average between 7000-8000 rpm. That equates to .26 pounds per second (950/60min/60sec). If the average lap time is 17 seconds it will burn 4.42 pounds of fuel per lap. (.26 x 17). If a gallon of fuel weighs roughly 7 pounds, 4.42 pounds divided by 7 pounds equals .63 gallons per lap. In 25 laps you would burn 15.75 gallons of fuel (25 x .63). By the time you add start up, idling, warm up laps and a couple of cautions it averages out to be about 1 gallon per lap. Better to have too much than too little as you won't get paid if you run out of fuel. A 360 burns about .5 gallon per lap.
The days of being able to transfer through to the A main from the non-qualifiers are pretty much over as far as I am concerned. This is no dis-credit to the Dunkin family - they did an outstanding job all weekend long (as usual). But when you a preparing a track for a 50 lap feature, it is just too wet early to allow for enough passing through the D, C and B mains. For example, lets take Donny Schatz's best lap being .5 seconds better than the field and stick him 21st in the C main. We have to deduct .2 seconds for clean air. He then has 15 laps at .3 seconds faster than the field to make up 7 spots and get a transfer. If he made every lap perfect and the race ran non-stop his performance advantage would gain him 4.5 seconds. (15 x .3) Better get a good start!
Moving on to the B main with the same .3 second performance advantage is even tougher. 22 laps at .3 seconds gets him 6.6 seconds on the race track. It would pretty much take a miracle to get through to the A from the back of with today's level of competition.
The equalizing factor is still the race track. If I had it my way last Saturday night, they could have started earlier and with less water to give some guys who had tough luck on their qualifying nights a shot with a trickier race track. Then, during all of their pomp and circumstance, driver intros and drawings re-work the track for the A main. Anymore, you pretty much have to have a perfect qualifying night to get into the big show Saturday. This is no discredit to the teams who did so accordingly either. When the lap times are still in the 15-16 second range in the C and B mains it just makes it a lot harder to pass when the track still has that much speed in it.
$.02
MB
Rome wasn't built in a day......but they sure didn't
waste any time burning it down!
|
|
|
August 12, 2014 at
10:21:48 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
12/06/2004
|
Posts:
|
191
|
|
|
If we go to the time frame and late start, we didn't have a certain Cappy whipping the boys on!
Sprints rule
|
|
|
August 12, 2014 at
01:51:01 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
08/04/2007
|
Posts:
|
135
|
|
|
I wish they wouldn't have reworked the track between the afternoon 'A' and the Trophy Dash World Challenge race.
I have to think that by having to re-do a rubber-down surface and the fact it was an hour between those races, the track could have been worked in to get the night show started closer to the regular time.
And why wasn't the cushion pushed out further before the main event? That seems to be the most space between the top groove and the wall I've seen on a Championship Saturday in my 20 years of attending.
Don't want this to come off as criticism of the Dunkins (who worked their asses off last week) just asking.
Is this heaven?
No, it's Iowa....Knoxville, Iowa.
|
|
|
|
August 12, 2014 at
03:16:12 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
04/21/2005
|
Posts:
|
35
|
|
|
This message was edited on
August 12, 2014 at
06:57:50 PM by DC1
Reply to:
Posted By: mbmotorspt on August 12 2014 at 10:01:51 AM
A 410 will use about 950 pounds per hour of fuel on average between 7000-8000 rpm. That equates to .26 pounds per second (950/60min/60sec). If the average lap time is 17 seconds it will burn 4.42 pounds of fuel per lap. (.26 x 17). If a gallon of fuel weighs roughly 7 pounds, 4.42 pounds divided by 7 pounds equals .63 gallons per lap. In 25 laps you would burn 15.75 gallons of fuel (25 x .63). By the time you add start up, idling, warm up laps and a couple of cautions it averages out to be about 1 gallon per lap. Better to have too much than too little as you won't get paid if you run out of fuel. A 360 burns about .5 gallon per lap.
The days of being able to transfer through to the A main from the non-qualifiers are pretty much over as far as I am concerned. This is no dis-credit to the Dunkin family - they did an outstanding job all weekend long (as usual). But when you a preparing a track for a 50 lap feature, it is just too wet early to allow for enough passing through the D, C and B mains. For example, lets take Donny Schatz's best lap being .5 seconds better than the field and stick him 21st in the C main. We have to deduct .2 seconds for clean air. He then has 15 laps at .3 seconds faster than the field to make up 7 spots and get a transfer. If he made every lap perfect and the race ran non-stop his performance advantage would gain him 4.5 seconds. (15 x .3) Better get a good start!
Moving on to the B main with the same .3 second performance advantage is even tougher. 22 laps at .3 seconds gets him 6.6 seconds on the race track. It would pretty much take a miracle to get through to the A from the back of with today's level of competition.
The equalizing factor is still the race track. If I had it my way last Saturday night, they could have started earlier and with less water to give some guys who had tough luck on their qualifying nights a shot with a trickier race track. Then, during all of their pomp and circumstance, driver intros and drawings re-work the track for the A main. Anymore, you pretty much have to have a perfect qualifying night to get into the big show Saturday. This is no discredit to the teams who did so accordingly either. When the lap times are still in the 15-16 second range in the C and B mains it just makes it a lot harder to pass when the track still has that much speed in it.
$.02
MB
|
Mark,
I appreciate the math. It certainly paints a more clear picture of the amount of laps they can run.
I fear the days of alphabet soup are gone because the D,C, and B are too short when the track is heavy. Sure we saw some great side by side racing last week, but passing was at a premium. Most was done after a caution where the field was bunched up, we did not see a lot of guys running folks down using different lines. The couple they had were blazing fast.
From my 35 years of watching sprints, heavy tracks usually mean fast racing and less passing.
|
|
|
August 12, 2014 at
03:32:07 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
01/03/2011
|
Posts:
|
1742
|
|
|
It was my 1st knoxville nationals. I drove from so cal. Put 3,841 miles on the rental car. I appreciate the way they made all efforts to complete the program. Now why the tire change ?. Throw the red add fuel and turn them loose. I'd bet that if they had to manage tire where it would be a different show. If you change a tire you go to the back. I'm sure every team out there can go balls out on 25 lap sessions. Try that shit on 50 laps. Also it could be a 3 day show. Thursday qualifier, Friday qualifier. Saturday early show and Saturday night extravaganza. Just a thought from a newbee to knoxville. Had a blast.
We need more sprint car racing at our home track.
|
|
|
August 12, 2014 at
03:44:50 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
04/29/2014
|
Posts:
|
1207
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: dirtface on August 12 2014 at 03:32:07 PM
It was my 1st knoxville nationals. I drove from so cal. Put 3,841 miles on the rental car. I appreciate the way they made all efforts to complete the program. Now why the tire change ?. Throw the red add fuel and turn them loose. I'd bet that if they had to manage tire where it would be a different show. If you change a tire you go to the back. I'm sure every team out there can go balls out on 25 lap sessions. Try that shit on 50 laps. Also it could be a 3 day show. Thursday qualifier, Friday qualifier. Saturday early show and Saturday night extravaganza. Just a thought from a newbee to knoxville. Had a blast.
|
With the old format it is true that not as much is riding on the Friday night show which we saw due to rain delays. The new format makes it worth alot to nearly every driver. With that said we still saw good racing this year and usually do any other year. The racing was excellent really by day show standards. I truely like having a 4 day show. Its another night of racing. If we all keep hating on the four day show format will we lose that 4th day and itll be condensed into a 3 day show and we will complain about that.
|
|
|
|
August 12, 2014 at
04:10:46 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
01/19/2009
|
Posts:
|
1188
|
|
|
I like the format and understand Mark's perspective.
with a heavy track it's obviously harder to pass with more cars running at top speed.
Would anyone be against adding a few laps to the B, C, D ???
Keep It Real
|
|
|
August 12, 2014 at
06:30:46 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
09/02/2013
|
Posts:
|
58
|
|
|
Knoxville ran a horse shit show all week long. There are people on here that will say Knoxville can do no wrong, but that was the poorest week of racing I have see in a long time. That shit almost made Jackson outlaw show look racy.
|
|
|
August 12, 2014 at
06:43:38 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
03/22/2008
|
Posts:
|
2444
|
|
|
It blows my mind when people bitch about a sprint race being too long. It's downright laughable. Get up and leave after 30 laps then or else enjoy all 50! I gurantee nobody is just riding around for the first 25. If the track was too heavy for much passing the first 30 laps, then how does a shorter feature remedy that? Personally I can't remember the last time I left the track wishing the feature was shorter. They used to have 150 lap sprint features back in the day. Now that may have been too long. Me, I love a 40-50 lapper!
A
|
|
|
|
August 12, 2014 at
06:46:43 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
01/06/2009
|
Posts:
|
402
|
|
|
Not that often you see fans complain about the track being too good but that was the case this year. I expected Thursday night to be tacky and fast but figured it would be better Saturday night. With the day show on Saturday and reworking the track prior to Saturday night I expected the track to burn off quicker and be dry slick by the end. I do give a lot of credit to the Kville track crew, they had that thing bad fast and about perfect. Trouble is perfect doesn't really make for good racing.
|
|
|
August 12, 2014 at
07:34:26 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
06/22/2014
|
Posts:
|
211
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: HoldenCaulfield on August 12 2014 at 06:43:38 PM
It blows my mind when people bitch about a sprint race being too long. It's downright laughable. Get up and leave after 30 laps then or else enjoy all 50! I gurantee nobody is just riding around for the first 25. If the track was too heavy for much passing the first 30 laps, then how does a shorter feature remedy that? Personally I can't remember the last time I left the track wishing the feature was shorter. They used to have 150 lap sprint features back in the day. Now that may have been too long. Me, I love a 40-50 lapper!
|
I respect your opinion as well as everyone else's on this board , I believe all fans should write Brian Stickel and give him your opinions on all that is discussed regarding Knoxville .They were considering lowering the numbers of laps but there board decided against this . I believe many valid points are made by fans , including you Mr. Caulfield . I want to tell you I saw many longer races in my day including 100 , 150, 75 .50 lap races and they were pretty exciting way back when , but due to many variables , rules, tires , light weight , bigger wings , etc has changed racing dramatically . You would not believe the racing long ago !!!! but that won't happen because everyone likes these locked down cars , if they were freed up more the racing would be great but the drivers , the costs and WRG love it the way it is because the tracks are packed ,and speed of these cars seem to draw in more new fans . Then alot of the drivers don't want to change these cars for various reasons , but as long as fans don't speak up things won't change for the better , to get more for your money , a faster program , and other things mentioned in these responses from fans . A shorter race may make a better race unless things are changed but it doesn't look like it will happen , TAKE IN A NON-WING RACE AND SEE FREED UP THEY ARE !!!
|
|
|
August 13, 2014 at
09:34:59 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
11/23/2004
|
Posts:
|
3943
|
|
|
Agree 100% with Mr. Mac and always enjoy the educated input by the best racing accountant in the world, lol. I had hoped for a double on the Thursday and I think the track could have held up enough. I would have liked to see the two shows run together so as to not give either night any advantage. I've been to Eldora most of the night a few times to see the show finished and this wouldn't have been nearly that late. Wishful thinking from an old-timer.......
|
|
|
|
August 13, 2014 at
02:08:33 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
12/01/2004
|
Posts:
|
673
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: MSPN on August 13 2014 at 09:34:59 AM
Agree 100% with Mr. Mac and always enjoy the educated input by the best racing accountant in the world, lol. I had hoped for a double on the Thursday and I think the track could have held up enough. I would have liked to see the two shows run together so as to not give either night any advantage. I've been to Eldora most of the night a few times to see the show finished and this wouldn't have been nearly that late. Wishful thinking from an old-timer.......
|
Hi Mike, good to hear from you. We need to get you on Twitter to stay current...technology, what can I say,lol! Not a bad show, the rain certainly was a hinderence for Dave and I. The older we are the sooner we want to be enetertained and then go home!
Good to hear from you, waiting on hockey and it won't be the same without Don Cherry and Ron Mac on HNIC...
|
|
|
August 13, 2014 at
03:11:09 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
09/14/2010
|
Posts:
|
7632
|
|
|
Yea, it was slow but I enjoyed it anyway. Seemed like a lot of time spent on track prep before heats, but I'm sure they know what they're doing. Legends are a total waste of time.
I don't buy Dirtface's suggestion of going down to 3 nites, previous 2 years Friday's racing was excellent, under "semi-new" format of fighting for 4 A-Main spots. Saturday morning show was kind of a waste too, 11th in C-Main best possible outcome....
However, if not for Blackjack" Brian Brown's shortlived challenge for 1st., I might have been disappointed...
Looking forward to my 1st Kokomo Smackdown soon.... hope it doesn't R%#N!
|
|