HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: Knoxville Saturday night random thoughts Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 2 of 2   of  33 replies
mbmotorspt
August 12, 2014 at 10:01:51 AM
Joined: 12/09/2004
Posts: 339
Reply

A 410 will use about 950 pounds per hour of fuel on average between 7000-8000 rpm.  That equates to .26 pounds per second (950/60min/60sec).  If the average lap time is 17 seconds it will burn 4.42 pounds of fuel per lap. (.26 x 17).  If a gallon of fuel weighs roughly 7 pounds, 4.42 pounds divided by 7 pounds equals .63 gallons per lap.  In 25 laps you would burn 15.75 gallons of fuel (25 x .63).  By the time you add start up, idling, warm up laps and a couple of cautions it averages out to be about 1 gallon per lap.  Better to have too much than too little as you won't get paid if you run out of fuel.  A 360 burns about .5 gallon per lap.

The days of being able to transfer through to the A main from the non-qualifiers are pretty much over as far as I am concerned.  This is no dis-credit to the Dunkin family - they did an outstanding job all weekend long (as usual).  But when you a preparing a track for a 50 lap feature, it is just too wet early to allow for enough passing through the D, C and B mains.  For example, lets take Donny Schatz's best lap being .5 seconds better than the field and stick him 21st in the C main.  We have to deduct .2 seconds for clean air.  He then has 15 laps at .3 seconds faster than the field to make up 7 spots and get a transfer.  If he made every lap perfect and the race ran non-stop his performance advantage would gain him 4.5 seconds.  (15 x .3)  Better get a good start!

Moving on to the B main with the same .3 second performance advantage is even tougher.  22 laps at .3 seconds gets him 6.6 seconds on the race track.  It would pretty much take a miracle to get through to the A from the back of with today's level of competition.

The equalizing factor is still the race track.  If I had it my way last Saturday night, they could have started earlier and with less water to give some guys who had tough luck on their qualifying nights a shot with a trickier race track.  Then, during all of their pomp and circumstance, driver intros and drawings re-work the track for the A main.  Anymore, you pretty much have to have a perfect qualifying night to get into the big show Saturday.  This is no discredit to the teams who did so accordingly either.  When the lap times are still in the 15-16 second range in the C and B mains it just makes it a lot harder to pass when the track still has that much speed in it.

$.02

MB


Rome wasn't built in a day......but they sure didn't
waste any time burning it down!

Sprnt12
MyWebsite
August 12, 2014 at 10:21:48 AM
Joined: 12/06/2004
Posts: 191
Reply

If we go to the time frame and late start, we didn't have a certain Cappy whipping the boys on!


Sprints rule

The Vision
August 12, 2014 at 01:51:01 PM
Joined: 08/04/2007
Posts: 135
Reply

I wish they wouldn't have reworked the track between the afternoon 'A' and the Trophy Dash World Challenge race.

I have to think that by having to re-do a rubber-down surface and the fact it was an hour between those races, the track could have been worked in to get the night show started closer to the regular time.

And why wasn't the cushion pushed out further before the main event?  That seems to be the most space between the top groove and the wall I've seen on a Championship Saturday in my 20 years of attending.

Don't want this to come off as criticism of the Dunkins (who worked their asses off last week) just asking.


Is this heaven?  
No, it's Iowa....Knoxville, Iowa.


DC1
August 12, 2014 at 03:16:12 PM
Joined: 04/21/2005
Posts: 35
Reply
This message was edited on August 12, 2014 at 06:57:50 PM by DC1
Reply to:
Posted By: mbmotorspt on August 12 2014 at 10:01:51 AM

A 410 will use about 950 pounds per hour of fuel on average between 7000-8000 rpm.  That equates to .26 pounds per second (950/60min/60sec).  If the average lap time is 17 seconds it will burn 4.42 pounds of fuel per lap. (.26 x 17).  If a gallon of fuel weighs roughly 7 pounds, 4.42 pounds divided by 7 pounds equals .63 gallons per lap.  In 25 laps you would burn 15.75 gallons of fuel (25 x .63).  By the time you add start up, idling, warm up laps and a couple of cautions it averages out to be about 1 gallon per lap.  Better to have too much than too little as you won't get paid if you run out of fuel.  A 360 burns about .5 gallon per lap.

The days of being able to transfer through to the A main from the non-qualifiers are pretty much over as far as I am concerned.  This is no dis-credit to the Dunkin family - they did an outstanding job all weekend long (as usual).  But when you a preparing a track for a 50 lap feature, it is just too wet early to allow for enough passing through the D, C and B mains.  For example, lets take Donny Schatz's best lap being .5 seconds better than the field and stick him 21st in the C main.  We have to deduct .2 seconds for clean air.  He then has 15 laps at .3 seconds faster than the field to make up 7 spots and get a transfer.  If he made every lap perfect and the race ran non-stop his performance advantage would gain him 4.5 seconds.  (15 x .3)  Better get a good start!

Moving on to the B main with the same .3 second performance advantage is even tougher.  22 laps at .3 seconds gets him 6.6 seconds on the race track.  It would pretty much take a miracle to get through to the A from the back of with today's level of competition.

The equalizing factor is still the race track.  If I had it my way last Saturday night, they could have started earlier and with less water to give some guys who had tough luck on their qualifying nights a shot with a trickier race track.  Then, during all of their pomp and circumstance, driver intros and drawings re-work the track for the A main.  Anymore, you pretty much have to have a perfect qualifying night to get into the big show Saturday.  This is no discredit to the teams who did so accordingly either.  When the lap times are still in the 15-16 second range in the C and B mains it just makes it a lot harder to pass when the track still has that much speed in it.

$.02

MB



Mark,

I appreciate the math. It certainly paints a more clear picture of the amount of laps they can run.

I fear the days of alphabet soup are gone because the D,C, and B are too short when the track is heavy. Sure we saw some great side by side racing last week, but passing was at a premium. Most was done after a caution where the field was bunched up, we did not see a lot of guys running folks down using different lines. The couple they had were blazing fast.

From my 35 years of watching sprints, heavy tracks usually mean fast racing and less passing.



dirtface
August 12, 2014 at 03:32:07 PM
Joined: 01/03/2011
Posts: 1742
Reply

It was my 1st knoxville nationals. I drove from so cal. Put 3,841 miles on the rental car. I appreciate the way they made all efforts to complete the program. Now why the tire change ?. Throw the red add fuel and turn them loose. I'd bet that if they had to manage tire where it would be a different show. If you change a tire you go to the back. I'm sure every team out there can go balls out on 25 lap sessions. Try that shit on 50 laps. Also it could be a 3 day show. Thursday qualifier, Friday qualifier. Saturday early show and Saturday night extravaganza. Just a thought from a newbee to knoxville. Had a blast.


We need more sprint car racing at our home track.

IADIRT
August 12, 2014 at 03:44:50 PM
Joined: 04/29/2014
Posts: 1207
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: dirtface on August 12 2014 at 03:32:07 PM

It was my 1st knoxville nationals. I drove from so cal. Put 3,841 miles on the rental car. I appreciate the way they made all efforts to complete the program. Now why the tire change ?. Throw the red add fuel and turn them loose. I'd bet that if they had to manage tire where it would be a different show. If you change a tire you go to the back. I'm sure every team out there can go balls out on 25 lap sessions. Try that shit on 50 laps. Also it could be a 3 day show. Thursday qualifier, Friday qualifier. Saturday early show and Saturday night extravaganza. Just a thought from a newbee to knoxville. Had a blast.



With the old format it is true that not as much is riding on the Friday night show which we saw due to rain delays. The new format makes it worth alot to nearly every driver. With that said we still saw good racing this year and usually do any other year. The racing was excellent really by day show standards. I truely like having a 4 day show. Its another night of racing. If we all keep hating on the four day show format will we lose that 4th day and itll be condensed into a 3 day show and we will complain about that.




YungWun24
August 12, 2014 at 04:10:46 PM
Joined: 01/19/2009
Posts: 1188
Reply

I like the format and understand Mark's perspective. 

with a heavy track it's obviously harder to pass with more cars running at top speed. 

Would anyone be against adding a few laps to the B, C, D ???

 


Keep It Real

Beanie82
August 12, 2014 at 06:30:46 PM
Joined: 09/02/2013
Posts: 58
Reply

Knoxville ran a horse shit show all week long.  There are people on here that will say Knoxville can do no wrong, but that was the poorest week of racing I have see in a long time.  That shit almost made Jackson outlaw show look racy.



HoldenCaulfield
August 12, 2014 at 06:43:38 PM
Joined: 03/22/2008
Posts: 2444
Reply

It blows my mind when people bitch about a sprint race being too long. It's downright laughable. Get up and leave after 30 laps then or else enjoy all 50! I gurantee nobody is just riding around for the first 25. If the track was too heavy for much passing the first 30 laps, then how does a shorter feature remedy that? Personally I can't remember the last time I left the track wishing the feature was shorter. They used to have 150 lap sprint features back in the day. Now that may have been too long. Me, I love a 40-50 lapper!


A


highspeeddirt
August 12, 2014 at 06:46:43 PM
Joined: 01/06/2009
Posts: 402
Reply

Not that often you see fans complain about the track being too good but that was the case this year. I expected Thursday night to be tacky and fast but figured it would be better Saturday night. With the day show on Saturday and reworking the track prior to Saturday night I expected the track to burn off quicker and be dry slick by the end. I do give a lot of credit to the Kville track crew, they had that thing bad fast and about perfect. Trouble is perfect doesn't really make for good racing.



winning drive
MyWebsite
August 12, 2014 at 07:34:26 PM
Joined: 06/22/2014
Posts: 211
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: HoldenCaulfield on August 12 2014 at 06:43:38 PM

It blows my mind when people bitch about a sprint race being too long. It's downright laughable. Get up and leave after 30 laps then or else enjoy all 50! I gurantee nobody is just riding around for the first 25. If the track was too heavy for much passing the first 30 laps, then how does a shorter feature remedy that? Personally I can't remember the last time I left the track wishing the feature was shorter. They used to have 150 lap sprint features back in the day. Now that may have been too long. Me, I love a 40-50 lapper!



  I   respect  your  opinion  as  well  as  everyone else's  on this  board   ,  I believe   all  fans  should write   Brian  Stickel and   give  him  your  opinions  on  all that is discussed  regarding   Knoxville  .They   were  considering  lowering  the numbers  of laps but  there  board  decided  against this . I believe  many valid  points  are made  by  fans , including  you  Mr.  Caulfield . I want to tell  you  I  saw many  longer  races  in my  day  including  100 , 150, 75 .50 lap races  and they  were  pretty  exciting  way back when  , but  due  to many  variables  , rules, tires , light weight , bigger  wings , etc   has  changed  racing  dramatically  . You  would not  believe  the racing  long  ago  !!!! but  that  won't happen because  everyone  likes  these  locked  down  cars  , if  they  were  freed  up more  the racing  would be great but  the drivers , the costs  and  WRG  love  it the way it is  because   the tracks  are packed ,and speed  of these  cars seem to draw  in more  new  fans  . Then  alot  of the drivers  don't want to  change  these  cars  for various reasons , but   as  long as fans  don't  speak up things  won't  change  for  the better  , to get  more  for your money , a  faster program , and other  things mentioned  in  these  responses  from  fans .  A shorter  race  may make  a better  race  unless  things are  changed  but it doesn't look like it  will  happen  , TAKE IN  A   NON-WING RACE  AND SEE  FREED UP THEY  ARE !!! 



MSPN
August 13, 2014 at 09:34:59 AM
Joined: 11/23/2004
Posts: 3943
Reply


Agree 100% with Mr. Mac and always enjoy the educated input by the best racing accountant in the world, lol.  I had hoped for a double on the Thursday and I think the track could have held up enough.  I would have liked to see the two shows run together so as to not give either night any advantage.  I've been to Eldora most of the night a few times to see the show finished and this wouldn't have been nearly that late.  Wishful thinking from an old-timer.......




Mr. Mac
MyWebsite
August 13, 2014 at 02:08:33 PM
Joined: 12/01/2004
Posts: 673
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: MSPN on August 13 2014 at 09:34:59 AM


Agree 100% with Mr. Mac and always enjoy the educated input by the best racing accountant in the world, lol.  I had hoped for a double on the Thursday and I think the track could have held up enough.  I would have liked to see the two shows run together so as to not give either night any advantage.  I've been to Eldora most of the night a few times to see the show finished and this wouldn't have been nearly that late.  Wishful thinking from an old-timer.......




Hi Mike, good to hear from you. We need to get you on Twitter to stay current...technology, what can I say,lol! Not a bad show, the rain certainly was a hinderence for Dave and I. The older we are the sooner we want to be enetertained and then go home!

Good to hear from you, waiting on hockey and it won't be the same without Don Cherry and Ron Mac on HNIC...



revjimk
August 13, 2014 at 03:11:09 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7632
Reply

Yea, it was slow but I enjoyed it anyway. Seemed like a lot of time spent on track prep before heats, but I'm sure they know what they're doing. Legends are a total waste of time.

I don't buy Dirtface's suggestion of going down to 3 nites, previous 2 years Friday's racing was excellent, under "semi-new" format of fighting for 4 A-Main spots. Saturday morning show was kind of a waste too, 11th in C-Main best possible outcome....

However, if not for Blackjack" Brian Brown's shortlived challenge for 1st., I might have been disappointed...

Looking forward to my 1st Kokomo Smackdown soon.... hope it doesn't R%#N!





Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy