HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: The race ain't for first Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 2 of 3   of  57 replies
Nick14
October 01, 2019 at 09:22:39 AM
Joined: 06/04/2012
Posts: 1739
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: revjimk on September 30 2019 at 10:29:30 PM

Common complaint, right?  I'm a fan of inverts. Worried about sandbagging? Do away with qualifying altogether & select starting grids at random, or invert based on season points

"X) driver passing 15 cars is neat except they don't past the most important one"?.... Come on... since you've been watching so long, you should know thats what makes a lot of racing interesting, battles back in the field 

Sounds like you're just getting burnt out on it... take a break & just go to a few select shows... or maybe wingless on bullrings????



Not sure if I would be a fan of doing away with qualifying altogether and selecting starting grids based on a pill draw. Makes the race less legitimate and more of a gimmick. Since this is about the WoO and they are basically the biggest professional organization in our form of motorsports, I think there is a need for the qualifying. Really the qualifying portion for the Outlaws does not last that long. Couple years ago I timed the qualifying portion of the Outlaw program at Eldora and I think it was just a little over 20mins and that was with a little clean up included, which in the grand scheme of things is not that much time to setup the program.

Inverts are fine but it still will not solve the front row winners as the original poster brought up. Here in Ohio I have seen FAST shows where they invert the field, driver was on the front row of the heat, won it, drew front row of the feature and won it. I sometimes wonder if the people are actually watching the race or are they just looking at results or race monitor.

Like your advice though. Some people do get burnt out especially if they have specific expectations. In Ohio, after the Waynesfield FAST show on Oct 12th, most likely we will not have another show until end of March and that most likely will be rained out. By then the race could be follow the leader with no passing and with not seeing a race for 6mo it will seem like the best race in a while.



railfan33
October 01, 2019 at 09:30:21 AM
Joined: 07/24/2010
Posts: 637
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: fiXXXer on October 01 2019 at 07:01:55 AM

I remember when I was a kid, it was a foregone conclusion that almost every week at Williams Grove and Lincoln, Fast Freddie would start 12th, storm through the field, take the lead from Len Thompson or Dave Haight on lap 13-15 and drive away from the field to win by a straightaway. That was as every bit as predictable as watching someone start on the front row and drive off. I saw one post elude to Lance winning from 8th at Port. That wasn't an exciting race that night as far as I'm concerned. He passed everyone like they were sitting still on a slow black and slick track then ran off and hid. Yeah he did some passing but was there really any suspense? Not exactly. It was pretty apparent by lap 5 that the 69K was going to dominate. A "good" race is in the eye of the beholder. Some people like passing, some like speed, some like back and forth competition. Me personally, I found it more exciting watching Brad Sweet and Donny Schatz playing cat and mouse with each other through traffic Saturday night at Lernerville than watching Lance pass 10 cars in 12 laps and destroy the field. 



Don’t disagree fixx. Initial post sparked my interest, so I just wanted to research starting spots of sanctioned race winners this year in central Pa. One of the best races(battles) I recall  is a WoO race from mid to late 2000‘s (memory a bit foggy on specifics) between The King and Montieth. Went on for laps and it was a fight for 10th place.



wolfie2985
October 01, 2019 at 02:14:24 PM
Joined: 07/29/2010
Posts: 759
Reply

Really just trying for some friendly debate here. This all started at Lernerville in July. Some old racin buddies told me they just got back from 3 nights of  Indiana Speedweek where they said they saw a lot of racing as USAC inverts the top 6 - as opposed to that night when there may have been one pass for the lead in a heat and David Gravel wired the feature. After paying attention, it happens a lot. 

This is scientific:

WoO from/including Knoxville to now. And going by some posts, this doesn't tell the whole story (the whole year)  but it does tell the story since Knoxville as one poster suggested.

18 races

7 won from the pole

14 won from the front row (includes pole)

So maybe it's not 80% from the pole, but it's 77.7% from the front row.  And I think if you analyzed the All Stars and local races, you'd have similar results.

and yep, I do remember many, many times when they'd invert the top 6 and Steve Kinser could magically qualify sixth - or wherever to magically start in the front.

So I'm just sayin when you step back and look, there's not a whole bunch of passing for the lead.

And, jus so you know, despite the bitchin,  I'd probably still be the first one at the gate if not for other commitments - and the 200 miles that didn't seem that far 30 years ago.

Have a nice day!

 

 




revjimk
October 01, 2019 at 02:29:17 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7632
Reply

" just got back from 3 nights of  Indiana Speedweek where they said they saw a lot of racing as USAC inverts the top 6"

Thats why I prefer wingless cars on a bullring. When I was driving from Colorado to the East Coast & back every summer, I would time it to hit races in the Hoosier State. Now that I relocated East, its a special trip & I haven't been for a while. 
Eastern Storm is good, but its mostly big tracks & low car counts, everybody makes the feature (make heats less meaningful) Also less guys in overalls & John Deere hats... wink



revjimk
October 01, 2019 at 02:33:17 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7632
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: El Wingador on October 01 2019 at 08:12:38 AM

Dammit man ..!! Lets just invert the entire field for the main and let em eat ..!! At the end, give everyone a participation trophy and a juice box ..!!

 

The whole point of racing is to be faster than the rest and beat them all to the checkers. The format for the Outlaws rewards the fast cars in the heats, where the Allstars punish theirs. Still the drivers and crews must be spot on or damn near close to have a shot at starting in a position that gives them the best chance at winning. 

 Of course, I like to see passing and cars moving through the field, but not as much as I like to see the guys running up front navigate through the back of the field while battling for the lead ..!! That’s where the action is ..!!

To me, the pole setter has the most pressure on him as well as a bullseye on his back and I love it ..!! As long as it’s not a rubber down track of follow the leader I’m good ….



"The whole point of racing is to be faster than the rest & beat them to them all to the  checkers"??? Not the WHOLE point... part of it is entertainment. Follow the leader isn't very entertaining to some of us....



revjimk
October 01, 2019 at 02:44:47 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7632
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: fiXXXer on October 01 2019 at 07:01:55 AM

I remember when I was a kid, it was a foregone conclusion that almost every week at Williams Grove and Lincoln, Fast Freddie would start 12th, storm through the field, take the lead from Len Thompson or Dave Haight on lap 13-15 and drive away from the field to win by a straightaway. That was as every bit as predictable as watching someone start on the front row and drive off. I saw one post elude to Lance winning from 8th at Port. That wasn't an exciting race that night as far as I'm concerned. He passed everyone like they were sitting still on a slow black and slick track then ran off and hid. Yeah he did some passing but was there really any suspense? Not exactly. It was pretty apparent by lap 5 that the 69K was going to dominate. A "good" race is in the eye of the beholder. Some people like passing, some like speed, some like back and forth competition. Me personally, I found it more exciting watching Brad Sweet and Donny Schatz playing cat and mouse with each other through traffic Saturday night at Lernerville than watching Lance pass 10 cars in 12 laps and destroy the field. 



Back when I started going to dirt track, early 60s, it was modified coupes (or "jalopies") at Eastside Speedway in Waynesboro, Va. They put the season points leader all the way in the back. Believe it or not, Smokey Stover won 22 out of 24 races in 1962, almost all from the back. Needless to say, the cars were all very different, homebuilt hotrods, unlike todays cars. It was really exciting... all the fans were either pro or anti Smokey, probably like it was with Fast Freddy in Pa.

There's a self published book about Shenandoah Valley dirt tracks, & it claims Smokey came up to Williams Grove one time & kicked ass. I tried to research it at EMMR, couldn't find a mention of his name....but some of the old timers there heard of him....he raced occasionally at Winchester or Hagerstown too




El Wingador
October 01, 2019 at 02:44:57 PM
Joined: 09/12/2015
Posts: 280
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: revjimk on October 01 2019 at 02:33:17 PM

"The whole point of racing is to be faster than the rest & beat them to them all to the  checkers"??? Not the WHOLE point... part of it is entertainment. Follow the leader isn't very entertaining to some of us....



Uhm, I'm pretty sure that's what I said .....



revjimk
October 01, 2019 at 02:48:28 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7632
Reply

I know you said it. I don't completely agree...



El Wingador
October 01, 2019 at 04:48:41 PM
Joined: 09/12/2015
Posts: 280
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: revjimk on October 01 2019 at 02:48:28 PM

I know you said it. I don't completely agree...



I said the whole point to racing is to be faster and win. I didn't say the whole point of watching. I also said the same as you, I don't like to watch follow the leader, just like you said. So where don't you agree, because I like to watch the same type of racing you do ....




revjimk
October 01, 2019 at 06:37:03 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7632
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: El Wingador on October 01 2019 at 04:48:41 PM

I said the whole point to racing is to be faster and win. I didn't say the whole point of watching. I also said the same as you, I don't like to watch follow the leader, just like you said. So where don't you agree, because I like to watch the same type of racing you do ....



OK, I see your distinction between racing & watching... lets not quibble!

But we seem to disagree about inverts



El Wingador
October 01, 2019 at 09:43:11 PM
Joined: 09/12/2015
Posts: 280
Reply
This message was edited on October 01, 2019 at 09:44:01 PM by El Wingador
Reply to:
Posted By: revjimk on October 01 2019 at 06:37:03 PM

OK, I see your distinction between racing & watching... lets not quibble!

But we seem to disagree about inverts



It's all good man !! I'm not even tripping .... This is a great thread and it's a nice change from the norm here on HH. Usually it's people bashing each other for one reason or the other. Won't be long and we won't have much to discuss till next race season. 



Nick14
October 02, 2019 at 10:43:57 AM
Joined: 06/04/2012
Posts: 1739
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: wolfie2985 on October 01 2019 at 02:14:24 PM

Really just trying for some friendly debate here. This all started at Lernerville in July. Some old racin buddies told me they just got back from 3 nights of  Indiana Speedweek where they said they saw a lot of racing as USAC inverts the top 6 - as opposed to that night when there may have been one pass for the lead in a heat and David Gravel wired the feature. After paying attention, it happens a lot. 

This is scientific:

WoO from/including Knoxville to now. And going by some posts, this doesn't tell the whole story (the whole year)  but it does tell the story since Knoxville as one poster suggested.

18 races

7 won from the pole

14 won from the front row (includes pole)

So maybe it's not 80% from the pole, but it's 77.7% from the front row.  And I think if you analyzed the All Stars and local races, you'd have similar results.

and yep, I do remember many, many times when they'd invert the top 6 and Steve Kinser could magically qualify sixth - or wherever to magically start in the front.

So I'm just sayin when you step back and look, there's not a whole bunch of passing for the lead.

And, jus so you know, despite the bitchin,  I'd probably still be the first one at the gate if not for other commitments - and the 200 miles that didn't seem that far 30 years ago.

Have a nice day!

 

 



I think this is mostly about optics and how things look when you look at the stats versus the competition on the course. As you said USAC inverts the top 6 but when I went back to look at the stats this year for the USAC Sprint Series, I show 29 total events ran this year so far. So this kinda skews the numbers when you compare the Outlaws who run 60+ races to this point. Of the 29 races run 5 have been won from the pole and 9 others have been won from 2nd with some of those winners leading a majority of the laps. That would be a total of 14 races won from the front row so 48% have been won from the front row. Adding to that, 5 additional races have been won from the 2nd row so 65.5% from the front 2 rows, and the average starting position for USAC this year is 3.75 (Skewed a little by Shane Cottle's 18th to 1st at I-69).

I think some people see no invert + some races won from the pole or front row and automatically think this = bad racing because there is not passing. Consequently some people see invert + some races won from 5th or 6th and think that all races are like this.

I went back and did a quick eye test from some of the same tracks the Outlaws visited back in 2012-2013 as well as this year. Sure enough, with an invert of the top 16 qualifiers in the heat races, drivers who started on the pole or the front couple of spots won the race. With that I would say that the invert has limited impact as to how much passing is done for the lead or for the quality of the race for that matter, but it did have more of an impact of who may have won instead. Looking at the heat races in some of those events back then, the fast qualifier started 4th and finished around 3rd or 4th.

I think with the equipment today and the drivers if you put the ones who are close in qualifying, give them the opportunity to move up through the heats, work on the cars, the racing is actually closer and more competitive.

 




SAF92
October 02, 2019 at 11:44:39 AM
Joined: 01/24/2018
Posts: 386
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Nick14 on October 02 2019 at 10:43:57 AM

I think this is mostly about optics and how things look when you look at the stats versus the competition on the course. As you said USAC inverts the top 6 but when I went back to look at the stats this year for the USAC Sprint Series, I show 29 total events ran this year so far. So this kinda skews the numbers when you compare the Outlaws who run 60+ races to this point. Of the 29 races run 5 have been won from the pole and 9 others have been won from 2nd with some of those winners leading a majority of the laps. That would be a total of 14 races won from the front row so 48% have been won from the front row. Adding to that, 5 additional races have been won from the 2nd row so 65.5% from the front 2 rows, and the average starting position for USAC this year is 3.75 (Skewed a little by Shane Cottle's 18th to 1st at I-69).

I think some people see no invert + some races won from the pole or front row and automatically think this = bad racing because there is not passing. Consequently some people see invert + some races won from 5th or 6th and think that all races are like this.

I went back and did a quick eye test from some of the same tracks the Outlaws visited back in 2012-2013 as well as this year. Sure enough, with an invert of the top 16 qualifiers in the heat races, drivers who started on the pole or the front couple of spots won the race. With that I would say that the invert has limited impact as to how much passing is done for the lead or for the quality of the race for that matter, but it did have more of an impact of who may have won instead. Looking at the heat races in some of those events back then, the fast qualifier started 4th and finished around 3rd or 4th.

I think with the equipment today and the drivers if you put the ones who are close in qualifying, give them the opportunity to move up through the heats, work on the cars, the racing is actually closer and more competitive.

 



Bingo... Today's competition so much closer than it was 20, 15, even 5 years ago. The split from the best car to the 16th best car is so much tighter. With competition this close and clean air being so important it makes zero sense to do an invert prior to heat races. I think the current format is perfect. Theres basically a random invert when they redraw for dash starting spots.



revjimk
October 02, 2019 at 11:58:57 AM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7632
Reply

Lets face it, there's no perfect format unless you could line them all up side by side, & that would require a track so wide that the outside lane would be way longer than the inside (diagonal starting line like track & field? that would really be goofy!)

Its probably good that different sanctions & tracks have different formats. I like Chili Bowl & Allstar systems myself. My biggest gripe is USAC, where everybody gets their qualifying time back, except that top 6 have to qualify thru heats. But in an event like Eastern Storm where everybody qualifies, it renders heats damn near meaningless...



egras
October 02, 2019 at 02:49:46 PM
Joined: 08/16/2009
Posts: 3977
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: wolfie2985 on October 01 2019 at 02:14:24 PM

Really just trying for some friendly debate here. This all started at Lernerville in July. Some old racin buddies told me they just got back from 3 nights of  Indiana Speedweek where they said they saw a lot of racing as USAC inverts the top 6 - as opposed to that night when there may have been one pass for the lead in a heat and David Gravel wired the feature. After paying attention, it happens a lot. 

This is scientific:

WoO from/including Knoxville to now. And going by some posts, this doesn't tell the whole story (the whole year)  but it does tell the story since Knoxville as one poster suggested.

18 races

7 won from the pole

14 won from the front row (includes pole)

So maybe it's not 80% from the pole, but it's 77.7% from the front row.  And I think if you analyzed the All Stars and local races, you'd have similar results.

and yep, I do remember many, many times when they'd invert the top 6 and Steve Kinser could magically qualify sixth - or wherever to magically start in the front.

So I'm just sayin when you step back and look, there's not a whole bunch of passing for the lead.

And, jus so you know, despite the bitchin,  I'd probably still be the first one at the gate if not for other commitments - and the 200 miles that didn't seem that far 30 years ago.

Have a nice day!

 

 



18 races is not enough to declare a trend.......especially in what have been some very wet, heavy tracks




fiXXXer
October 02, 2019 at 04:25:46 PM
Joined: 10/26/2014
Posts: 2490
Reply
This message was edited on October 02, 2019 at 09:48:54 PM by fiXXXer
Reply to:
Posted By: El Wingador on October 01 2019 at 09:43:11 PM

It's all good man !! I'm not even tripping .... This is a great thread and it's a nice change from the norm here on HH. Usually it's people bashing each other for one reason or the other. Won't be long and we won't have much to discuss till next race season. 



Agreed. A few more threads like this and a few less threads about "slip n slides" or "broke dick drivers" and this forum may have a decent reputation among the sprint car community instead of people within the sport discounting it as a cesspool of ignorance and idiocy like they do now. You never know, we may even get some posts from actual drivers, owners, crew chiefs, officials etc. I still sometimes wonder why Johnny Gibson even bothers posting here but I'm damn glad he does.



revjimk
October 02, 2019 at 04:35:04 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7632
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: fiXXXer on October 02 2019 at 04:25:46 PM

Agreed. A few more threads like this and a few less threads about "slip n slides" or "broke dick drivers" and this forum may have a decent reputation among the sprint car community instead of people within the sport discounting it as a cesspool of ignorance and idiocy like they do now. You never know, we may even get some posts from actual drivers, owners, crew chiefs, officials etc. I still sometimes wonder why Johnny Gibson even bothers posting here but I'm damn glad he does.



 "cesspool of ignorance and idiocracy".... teehee wink

Actually I think the word should be "idiocy"....."idiocracy" means government by idiots

No comment on that... wink



fiXXXer
October 02, 2019 at 09:48:24 PM
Joined: 10/26/2014
Posts: 2490
Reply
This message was edited on October 02, 2019 at 09:49:30 PM by fiXXXer
Reply to:
Posted By: revjimk on October 02 2019 at 04:35:04 PM

 "cesspool of ignorance and idiocracy".... teehee wink

Actually I think the word should be "idiocy"....."idiocracy" means government by idiots

No comment on that... wink



Yeah I know the difference. My phone is really good at replacing words I type with other similar words. It's way smarter than me, but I definitely know the difference LOL. Thanks for picking that out. I fixed it.




DirtKing9
October 03, 2019 at 05:21:34 AM
Joined: 01/18/2017
Posts: 59
Reply

I've been to around 40 races this year,   The two most entertaining have been the Front Row Challange when Brady Bacon and Kevin Thomas Jr opted to start in the rear.  Bacon last to first in 13 laps.  The second one was when Danny Deitrich took the challenge to start 18 at Port.  The thing with both of thoes fields is there were not a full field of very compitive cars like an WOO or All-Star event.  Another memorable race was World Finals a couple of years ago when Donny spun out early and charged all the way back to 2nd.  I think with todays formats the lend to good racing most of the time and when you do have that rare ocassion when someone makes a charge from the back it makes it more memorable, than if they were starting back there all the time.

Bottom line is I'll be at the Grove camping having a good time, Sure I hope its not follow the leader, but no matter what it will be a great weekend with friends and racing!



revjimk
October 03, 2019 at 09:10:41 AM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7632
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: fiXXXer on October 02 2019 at 09:48:24 PM

Yeah I know the difference. My phone is really good at replacing words I type with other similar words. It's way smarter than me, but I definitely know the difference LOL. Thanks for picking that out. I fixed it.



One of the many reasons I don't have a Smartphone....





Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy