HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: Wow! Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 1 of 2   of  24 replies
Hannity
March 16, 2013 at 06:13:25 PM
Joined: 09/18/2009
Posts: 536
Reply

http://www.hoseheadsclassifieds.com/ClassifiedDetail.cfm?ClassifiedKey=89241

 

 




Lefty Wilbury
March 16, 2013 at 07:40:27 PM
Joined: 08/09/2009
Posts: 503
Reply

$20,000 305 motor??? Tracks had better get together and lay down some serious standard rules if this class is going to continue as a entry level real grass roots division. This is a great class but is quickly getting out of hand. IMO



Sprinter 79
MyWebsite
March 16, 2013 at 09:50:57 PM
Joined: 12/05/2010
Posts: 840
Reply
This should not surprise anyone. This is the problem when you do not spec everything on the engine and then tech tech tech. This is where it goes. This is also a part of the reason why open wheel racing is losing cars by the day. The 305's were supposed to be a class for people to get in and race on a budget. That is no longer the case.
Never hit stationary objects!


GMAC
March 17, 2013 at 03:40:25 AM
Joined: 12/18/2007
Posts: 30
Reply
A different kind of budget/entry level racing but down under this class is spreading like wild fire. Based on Commodore V6 ( Buick V6 ), control ECU and nothing but production (road car) parts, no dry sumps, absolutely no variations from original heads, bottom end etc. Doesn't matter how much you spend on your motor you will have minimal advantage over the guy who recoed his motor at any run of the mill engine re conditioner Also at Western Springs NZ we have a F2 midget class running 2ltr production based engines with a restricter plate capping horsepower at 200hp, again means the cleaver guy who picks up a wrecker engine and sorts out the injection and the restricter plate is at no disadvantage to the guy who wants to open his cheque book to the local trick engine builder... http://www.nzwingless.co.nz/

305 9A
March 17, 2013 at 02:56:18 PM
Joined: 05/03/2010
Posts: 156
Reply

Sprinter 79, Many have tried, but so far it's not happening. I am pesimistic about ever keeping the 305 engines economical. Larry, I'm still going to try keeping the 305's affordable. See you in Burlington!



racrguy
March 17, 2013 at 03:19:15 PM
Joined: 03/26/2009
Posts: 96
Reply
One thing you guys are failing to realize, that 20,000 motor isn't buying an advantage. I've seen those expensive ASI engines get outrun by much cheaper in house motors. There isn't 20k to spend in these motors, you've probably got 10k in parts there, so he's charging 10k for machine work and labor.


brettco
March 17, 2013 at 04:02:15 PM
Joined: 12/03/2004
Posts: 517
Reply
Well either way its only going to get worse. I remember when a guy spent 24k on a 360 and builders around here said they couldn't spend that much on a 360 if they tried. That builder gets 42k now.

trecraft
March 17, 2013 at 04:44:50 PM
Joined: 11/15/2008
Posts: 598
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Hannity on March 16 2013 at 06:13:25 PM

http://www.hoseheadsclassifieds.com/ClassifiedDetail.cfm?ClassifiedKey=89241

 

 



Somehow, and this is just my opinion, this is not exactly what French had in mind when he started the Racesaver program. But just in case. If you buy this motor, I can sell you a 1985 Nance chassis to put it in for just $ 250 , $2,500, or $25,000.



gentleman
March 18, 2013 at 11:55:37 AM
Joined: 05/16/2008
Posts: 89
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: trecraft on March 17 2013 at 04:44:50 PM

Somehow, and this is just my opinion, this is not exactly what French had in mind when he started the Racesaver program. But just in case. If you buy this motor, I can sell you a 1985 Nance chassis to put it in for just $ 250 , $2,500, or $25,000.



Gonna get my friend,Ed ,to buy it for me,so we can own the Racesaver's in our area...




Ca Sprintcar fan
March 18, 2013 at 12:30:35 PM
Joined: 01/29/2012
Posts: 905
Reply
This message was edited on March 18, 2013 at 12:33:01 PM by Ca Sprintcar fan

Wow what a waste of money. I could buy two used but fresh 410's for that price. They should just go with a GM 604 crate engine and forget the 305 class if that is what the 305 goes for. $4,000 vs $20,000 for about the same lap times.


Northern California Sprintcars

Sprinter 79
MyWebsite
March 18, 2013 at 02:52:32 PM
Joined: 12/05/2010
Posts: 840
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: 305 9A on March 17 2013 at 02:56:18 PM

Sprinter 79, Many have tried, but so far it's not happening. I am pesimistic about ever keeping the 305 engines economical. Larry, I'm still going to try keeping the 305's affordable. See you in Burlington!



I know that you are making an effort to curb this stuff 305 9A. There are a few people that want to see it controlled. I also agree with another post on here about how it does not matter what people spend there is no advantage. Although I do not agree with this statement when we are talking about a lack of tech as rules are only rules to racers if they are policed, the bottom line is that when a fellow is looking to get into the sport on a budget he is far less likely to go where he thinks that he may have to spend a lot of money to be competitive. I have seen this in every form of racing that I have been involved with. If people think that they need to mortgage the house to be involved they tend to go elsewhere. A $20,000 305 to race for $600. to win and $100 to start is simply stupid. Perception is everything to people just getting involved. It is what lures people in and it can be what drives them away.
Never hit stationary objects!

nerfbar
March 18, 2013 at 08:05:35 PM
Joined: 03/18/2013
Posts: 1
Reply
This is a racesaver tech man and can seal engines.. This is a GOOD example why racesaver engine builders should NOT tech...


DanMan
March 19, 2013 at 06:44:00 AM
Joined: 01/14/2012
Posts: 8
Reply
Just prove's there's a fool born every minute. Paying $20k for a $10K engine is stupid, but someone will do it. GM909 block isn't even legal. Doubt the Calles crank would make weight either.

godaddyracing
March 19, 2013 at 08:33:53 AM
Joined: 06/19/2009
Posts: 98
Reply
This message was edited on March 19, 2013 at 08:51:12 AM by godaddyracing
Reply to:
Posted By: DanMan on March 19 2013 at 06:44:00 AM
Just prove's there's a fool born every minute. Paying $20k for a $10K engine is stupid, but someone will do it. GM909 block isn't even legal. Doubt the Calles crank would make weight either.


You guys can bash the builder/seller all you want to, but here's a couple of things to consider:

1. Very few, if ANY, engine builders are making this kind of power
from a true legal RaceSaver 305, so if the numbers are true, they're
definitely on to something.

2. He can ask whatever he wants for the engine...doesn't necessarily
mean he'll get it, but there are people out there who will write a check
for big HP....they're called RACERS. We're all guilty of it. Hence the
reason we have ASCS 360s north of $40k. We're our own worst enemies
sometimes.

3. The 909 GM block is perfectly legal for RaceSaver competition.

4. Does big HP guarantee a win? No, it doesn't, but when everything
else is 'right', a little extra HP and TQ sure would be nice to have on
tap. There are a lot of guys you could put in 1st class equipment and
couldn't make a local show, and then there are guys who could take a
sh1tbox and contend for the win at a bigger show. Sometimes how the guy
in the seat performs is MORE IMPORTANT than how many HP the bullet
makes.

5. Putting the GM 604 crate motor...or any other CRATE motor for that matter..in a racecar is a bad idea. Crate motors kill the market for performance parts manufacturers. Which, in case, any of you forgot, is the main group of manufacturers that support dirt track racing.

JMO-





CBGarage
MyWebsite
March 19, 2013 at 09:52:36 AM
Joined: 08/25/2008
Posts: 80
Reply

I'm not going to lie, we tied up quite a bit in our 305's. A lot of guys are building motors complete pan to injectors for $7,500 including ignition.....I cannot make myself build that sorry of a motor. Stock cranks, I-beam rods, heavy pistons and so on. These motors are known to lug and when you put a gasser in the car on a half mile locked down track, I would suspect you'll see a lot of these "affordable" motors shelling parts from one end to the other. How is it affordable if you're putting 3 or 4 motors together during the season vs. building 1 good one and running it all season? As for his hp numbers, I can see it. As more and more people start building these motors, more and more tricks will be found that will still fit within the rules but increase horsepower. It happens in every class of cars under every rules structure. We used to run a spec headed, flat top, 360 motors. I have as much in my 305 as I did those 360's and we're racing for half the purse. That's the real stupid part is that we're spending the same money to race for half the money. I'm not seeing the money savings in the 305's.....maybe I'm wrong, maybe a stock bottom end will live, but I'm not betting my money on it!

Block with splayed caps, ready to go $1,000, crank $850, rods $500, pistons $750, camshaft $150, heads $1,800 (after you replace the rocker studs), injectors $2,500, ignition $700, pan $500 (good wet sump pan). That's $8,750 and doesn't include balancing, misc. machining, bearings, rings, pushrods, lifters, rocker arms, front cover, water pump, pulley's, balancer, valve covers, stacks, breathers, plumbing, and all the other misc. stuff to go along with it. You can easily tie $10-12-even $15,000 up in these motors. $20,000, yeah a little over the top but that one does have a set of $5,000 injectors, $300 pulley set up and so on.




racrguy
March 19, 2013 at 04:27:52 PM
Joined: 03/26/2009
Posts: 96
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: CBGarage on March 19 2013 at 09:52:36 AM

I'm not going to lie, we tied up quite a bit in our 305's. A lot of guys are building motors complete pan to injectors for $7,500 including ignition.....I cannot make myself build that sorry of a motor. Stock cranks, I-beam rods, heavy pistons and so on. These motors are known to lug and when you put a gasser in the car on a half mile locked down track, I would suspect you'll see a lot of these "affordable" motors shelling parts from one end to the other. How is it affordable if you're putting 3 or 4 motors together during the season vs. building 1 good one and running it all season? As for his hp numbers, I can see it. As more and more people start building these motors, more and more tricks will be found that will still fit within the rules but increase horsepower. It happens in every class of cars under every rules structure. We used to run a spec headed, flat top, 360 motors. I have as much in my 305 as I did those 360's and we're racing for half the purse. That's the real stupid part is that we're spending the same money to race for half the money. I'm not seeing the money savings in the 305's.....maybe I'm wrong, maybe a stock bottom end will live, but I'm not betting my money on it!

Block with splayed caps, ready to go $1,000, crank $850, rods $500, pistons $750, camshaft $150, heads $1,800 (after you replace the rocker studs), injectors $2,500, ignition $700, pan $500 (good wet sump pan). That's $8,750 and doesn't include balancing, misc. machining, bearings, rings, pushrods, lifters, rocker arms, front cover, water pump, pulley's, balancer, valve covers, stacks, breathers, plumbing, and all the other misc. stuff to go along with it. You can easily tie $10-12-even $15,000 up in these motors. $20,000, yeah a little over the top but that one does have a set of $5,000 injectors, $300 pulley set up and so on.



That's odd. I've got one of these affordable motors with a 2 bolt block, and stock crank. I do have a good set of rods and pistons in my engine and it's been raced on both TMS and Lonestar speedway, the only thing I've had to do to the engine since 2006 is roll bearings in the bottom end because I lost an oil pump, install new intake gaskets, and regular maintenance. Tell me more of these affordable motors that shell out parts regularly.

I didn't get the nickname Club Foot for nothing.

I may not be the fastest, but my engine is competitive as I've never been flat outran in a straight line.



CBGarage
MyWebsite
March 19, 2013 at 06:39:59 PM
Joined: 08/25/2008
Posts: 80
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: racrguy on March 19 2013 at 04:27:52 PM

That's odd. I've got one of these affordable motors with a 2 bolt block, and stock crank. I do have a good set of rods and pistons in my engine and it's been raced on both TMS and Lonestar speedway, the only thing I've had to do to the engine since 2006 is roll bearings in the bottom end because I lost an oil pump, install new intake gaskets, and regular maintenance. Tell me more of these affordable motors that shell out parts regularly.

I didn't get the nickname Club Foot for nothing.

I may not be the fastest, but my engine is competitive as I've never been flat outran in a straight line.



Glad it works for you is all I can say......I wouldn't dare risk a stock crank and 2 bolt mains @ 8,000 rpm! But hey, maybe I'm wrong and a stock crank is all you need?



Sprinter 79
MyWebsite
March 20, 2013 at 12:14:52 PM
Joined: 12/05/2010
Posts: 840
Reply
This message was edited on March 20, 2013 at 12:21:48 PM by Sprinter 79
I agree with you racerguy. We purchased the cheapest forged crank that we could find which was $300. on line. It weighs 50 pounds, which makes the mandatory 48 pounds or heavier 305 rules and we turn it 8,000 all day long. It is currently in our 360 that we race with The Invaders. The 305 class can be made to be MUCH less expensive with a little effort. Our block is also a 2 bolt main and it has 3 years on it without a failure. Our camshaft cost us $125. and our rocker system was $224 stainless from Speedway. We have about $3,800 in our engine and it has run at 8,000 rpm fairly flawlessly. The parts are out there to knock the cost down with a little effort. This is what I mean by making every part in the engine spec and tech tech tech. If the rules call for a specific crank and the tracks tech for that crank then everyone would be on the same playing field and the cost could be managed. There is no need for $20,000 engines in a class where you are trying to bring in new blood to grow the sport. Hell a bare set of RHS 50cc heads can be had for around $650.00 bare. (Burlington Rules, I have heard that the racesaver heads are up there a bit in price. Another flaw if you ask me) For the cost of the heads if a club made the cheapest after market iron head a spec deal that would also drive down the cost. Drop in cheap Speedway stainless valves ($8. a piece) and the springs required to match that cheap cam with black oxide keepers and retainers and you are still less then a grand in the heads. We have .550 lift on our cam, that is more than enough to do the job. Don't try to run 9,000 rpm and this engine can live. Racers are their own worst enemies. Then we wonder why classes don't grow.
Never hit stationary objects!


CBGarage
MyWebsite
March 20, 2013 at 03:21:48 PM
Joined: 08/25/2008
Posts: 80
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Sprinter 79 on March 20 2013 at 12:14:52 PM
I agree with you racerguy. We purchased the cheapest forged crank that we could find which was $300. on line. It weighs 50 pounds, which makes the mandatory 48 pounds or heavier 305 rules and we turn it 8,000 all day long. It is currently in our 360 that we race with The Invaders. The 305 class can be made to be MUCH less expensive with a little effort. Our block is also a 2 bolt main and it has 3 years on it without a failure. Our camshaft cost us $125. and our rocker system was $224 stainless from Speedway. We have about $3,800 in our engine and it has run at 8,000 rpm fairly flawlessly. The parts are out there to knock the cost down with a little effort. This is what I mean by making every part in the engine spec and tech tech tech. If the rules call for a specific crank and the tracks tech for that crank then everyone would be on the same playing field and the cost could be managed. There is no need for $20,000 engines in a class where you are trying to bring in new blood to grow the sport. Hell a bare set of RHS 50cc heads can be had for around $650.00 bare. (Burlington Rules, I have heard that the racesaver heads are up there a bit in price. Another flaw if you ask me) For the cost of the heads if a club made the cheapest after market iron head a spec deal that would also drive down the cost. Drop in cheap Speedway stainless valves ($8. a piece) and the springs required to match that cheap cam with black oxide keepers and retainers and you are still less then a grand in the heads. We have .550 lift on our cam, that is more than enough to do the job. Don't try to run 9,000 rpm and this engine can live. Racers are their own worst enemies. Then we wonder why classes don't grow.


I agree with everything you said about what should be done to control costs and how we as racers are our own worst enemy. Unfortunatly the tracks I race at are black gumbo and not very forgiving on motors. If we were racing on a sandy surface where you're always trying to hook the car up, I wouldn't be afraid of less than the best. But when we're racing at places that sometimes you can't get the car free enough, I think that's just asking for trouble with stock bottom ends. Again, maybe not, maybe these motors won't make enough power or torque to blow up no matter how much you try to put them through.....only time will tell.

Is there anyone out there that runs a stock bottom end in a 305 at Knoxville? Just curious because that's the best track I can think of to compare to what we're racing on around here.



Sprinter 79
MyWebsite
March 21, 2013 at 12:49:33 AM
Joined: 12/05/2010
Posts: 840
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: CBGarage on March 20 2013 at 03:21:48 PM

I agree with everything you said about what should be done to control costs and how we as racers are our own worst enemy. Unfortunatly the tracks I race at are black gumbo and not very forgiving on motors. If we were racing on a sandy surface where you're always trying to hook the car up, I wouldn't be afraid of less than the best. But when we're racing at places that sometimes you can't get the car free enough, I think that's just asking for trouble with stock bottom ends. Again, maybe not, maybe these motors won't make enough power or torque to blow up no matter how much you try to put them through.....only time will tell.

Is there anyone out there that runs a stock bottom end in a 305 at Knoxville? Just curious because that's the best track I can think of to compare to what we're racing on around here.



I am sure that there are exceptions to the rule. There are always going to be places that require different formulas and that is a good point and it has been noted. I guess I just wish that there was more of an effort made to help control this stuff. The same basic thing is happening with the 305's that happened with the 360's, and now you need to spend 410 funds to race 360's for less money. It just seems to defeat the purpose. As for Knoxville and stock bottom ends, I am sure that there aren't. My driver was involved with a fellow that ran at knoxville with a 305 however, and he said that the knoxville guys turn the motors 9,000 or so rpm's, so there again the question must be asked, is it the engine that really needs to be that good, or the racer needs to operate within a reasonable means to drive the cost down? We are not a very bright group of people most of the time, we racers. So in the end I would concede that maybe there are tracks that are going to require better parts, but that should not translate into the entirety of the class needing to spend that money. Out here in the Illinois, Iowa, Wisconsin area we (as in personally, not as an entire class) have been turning our engines 8,000 rpm's and they are staying together. I had run the same 2 bolt main 305 complete bottom end for 3 seasons. Does it win, NO. Is it competitive, yeah with a good driver. That has been my short coming. wink We converted to a 360 last year because it did not make any sense for me to keep spending the money that I was spending to race for $100. for a 10th place finish. MY 360 was a $4,000 engine, but it did a little better job of paying for itself, which makes the racing a little easier on the pocketbook.
Never hit stationary objects!



Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy