HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: Cowtown Speedway Update? Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 1 of 2   of  21 replies
BanditBen1
January 21, 2013 at 05:01:40 PM
Joined: 12/31/2008
Posts: 52
Reply

Anyone heard any updated about whether Cowtown hopes to open at all in 2013 or is essentially closed for good? Their website has a picture of a darkened track at night w/ no info that basically leaves you with the impression they're closed for good. Hate to lose this racy little joint...




JonR
January 21, 2013 at 05:57:10 PM
Joined: 05/28/2008
Posts: 872
Reply
This message was edited on January 21, 2013 at 07:22:17 PM by JonR

The best place online to get info is at elbowsup.com. They are a DFW centric racing site. The following link does not sound good. The Jeff that is mentioned in the thread is the promoter from last year.

http://www.elbowsup.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=46808



BanditBen1
January 22, 2013 at 07:53:44 AM
Joined: 12/31/2008
Posts: 52
Reply

Thanks, looks like unless a minor miracle happens we've seen our last race there.




Dryslick Willie
January 23, 2013 at 07:31:58 AM
Joined: 12/17/2009
Posts: 2254
Reply
A minor miracle is probably accurate if what I've heard is right. The problems that need to be corrected should be the owner's responsibility to correct. From what I've heard they don't wanna spend the money. The only way it could happen is if someone with deep pockets came in to promote the place and was willing to make the repairs that the owner won't make. Slim chance that's going to happen. Too bad cause it's a helluva lot better than the track which should never been built next door.

OKCFan12
MyWebsite
January 24, 2013 at 01:59:40 AM
Joined: 04/18/2005
Posts: 4764
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Dryslick Willie on January 23 2013 at 07:31:58 AM
A minor miracle is probably accurate if what I've heard is right. The problems that need to be corrected should be the owner's responsibility to correct. From what I've heard they don't wanna spend the money. The only way it could happen is if someone with deep pockets came in to promote the place and was willing to make the repairs that the owner won't make. Slim chance that's going to happen. Too bad cause it's a helluva lot better than the track which should never been built next door.


Indeed it is. Much better. Maybe the fellow who instigated much of the movement to close the track could take it over and fund the repairs. He does have deep pockets wink
How much would could a wouldchuck chuck if a 
wouldchuck could chuck would

pack
January 24, 2013 at 02:45:35 AM
Joined: 02/06/2010
Posts: 81
Reply
Correct me if I'm wrong but what I heard was there were ground up shingle clippings as a road bed. If that is the reason why would land owner not have to clean it up even if it's not leased as a race track? Don't jump down my neck if I am wrong just going by what I was told .


JonR
January 24, 2013 at 08:22:14 AM
Joined: 05/28/2008
Posts: 872
Reply

The common story is that there are two main issues facing the track. Hopefully, the common story is close to the truth.

1) There are ground up shingle clippings used in the parking lots and pits. Some of the shingle clippings are causing issues with the drainage of the property and causing flooding to adjancent properties. It seems that the clippings are causing some drains to become clog/bypassed. This issue will have to be addressed regardless.

2) The bigger and more expensive issue is that the City of Kennedale went to install a new updated power meter on the property. (The track sits inside the city limits) When they went to update the power meter they determined that the track did not have it's own power meter but rather was sharing the power meter with the home of the track owner. This is against the electrical code to have two properties sharing a power meter. When they went to install the power meter at the track, it was determined that the wiring at the track was not up to code and was unsafe. If you can imagine a 50 year old track and having different people add/change the wiring over the years, it is easy to see how it would not be up to code. Basically, the story is that all of the wiring for the track will need to be redone. This issue only needs to be addressed if the track is going to be used.

If anyone has any better information, please correct anything that is not correct.

 



pack
January 24, 2013 at 08:45:14 AM
Joined: 02/06/2010
Posts: 81
Reply

That makes a lil more since. Thanks



cmakin
MyWebsite
January 24, 2013 at 09:03:15 AM
Joined: 12/07/2005
Posts: 4445
Reply

Hmm, sounds like a good way for an electrician to become a track sponsor. . . . .


www.manvelmotorsports.com


BigRightRear
January 24, 2013 at 09:43:26 AM
Joined: 11/27/2004
Posts: 3751
Reply

am I missing something here...how can "clean up of environmental issues" get a pass by closing the track?

the problem will still be there and the responsibility for that problem does not go away...does it?

also kinda shocked that powering a track can spin a residential meter that many revs / years without the power company picking up on it...making the bill for a house that much higher during race months should have tripped a red flag long ago!

sad to see a track go...but this story seems very odd

 

 

 


Lincoln 1845 ft/.35 mile T1=118MPH 
Eldora 2287 ft/.43mile T3=135MPH
Port 2716 ft/.51 mile T3=TBD
Grove 2792 ft/.53 mile T3=135MPH
Selinsgrove 2847 ft/.54 mile T1=136MPH
"I didn't move to PA from El Paso in search of better 
weather." Van May

Speedkills
MyWebsite
January 24, 2013 at 09:44:38 AM
Joined: 02/09/2012
Posts: 863
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: cmakin on January 24 2013 at 09:03:15 AM

Hmm, sounds like a good way for an electrician to become a track sponsor. . . . .



Exactly what I was thinking, if I was an electrician and lived in this area and cared about this track I think (alot of If's there, I know) I would try to get some people together and donate my time to get things back up to date. Not trying to make it out to be a small task but if someone really wanted to see something happen its not impossible, that also is if the owner or promoter is even willing to put the money into buying the materials.


http://gph.is/XMLGff

Speedkills
MyWebsite
January 24, 2013 at 10:03:26 AM
Joined: 02/09/2012
Posts: 863
Reply
This message was edited on January 24, 2013 at 10:04:07 AM by Speedkills
Reply to:
Posted By: BigRightRear on January 24 2013 at 09:43:26 AM

am I missing something here...how can "clean up of environmental issues" get a pass by closing the track?

the problem will still be there and the responsibility for that problem does not go away...does it?

also kinda shocked that powering a track can spin a residential meter that many revs / years without the power company picking up on it...making the bill for a house that much higher during race months should have tripped a red flag long ago!

sad to see a track go...but this story seems very odd

 

 

 



My guess is, and take it for what its worth, I only know the situation from what I've read. Someone in an earlier post made the comment that the shingle grindings that are the environmental issue will need to be cleaned up regardless if the track is open or closed, this is probably the smaller issue of remedy but also an issue none the less.

The electrical issue is probably something that has been ongoing for awhile and its just finally came to a head. I would say that what went on is the electrical bill is under the tracks name and the owners personal home was just added onto the hookup at some point throughout the years so you would have an electrical bill for a racetrack and the owners home was also drawing off it and nobody probably thought much about it or the electrical co. knew about it and just finally had to deal with it. Its not that uncommon for people that have a businesses and live beside it to try to do this, I know someone where I live that built his home in the middle of his storage locker complex and you barely see its there, I can guarantee he benefits in certain ways from doing it. That is why there are city regulations for this type of stuff, cause people are out there doing it. My guess is its just a money thing, they've likely gotten bids and they probably exceed $50,000 to rewire the complex and from the way it sounds the owner doesn't really like to spend money on the place and I can't imagine that the promoter wants to stick that kind of money into something that at the end of the day isn't his. I would say there best chance is if people care enough to volunteer time and equipment to get the work done.


http://gph.is/XMLGff


BigRightRear
January 24, 2013 at 11:55:07 AM
Joined: 11/27/2004
Posts: 3751
Reply
This message was edited on January 24, 2013 at 11:55:43 AM by BigRightRear

makes sense...but trenching and running copper to meet code - depending on distances) might be less $ than solving run off issues which would include enviro impact / compliance studies in some areas of the country.

sorry to hear about this either way.


Lincoln 1845 ft/.35 mile T1=118MPH 
Eldora 2287 ft/.43mile T3=135MPH
Port 2716 ft/.51 mile T3=TBD
Grove 2792 ft/.53 mile T3=135MPH
Selinsgrove 2847 ft/.54 mile T1=136MPH
"I didn't move to PA from El Paso in search of better 
weather." Van May

JonR
January 24, 2013 at 12:23:38 PM
Joined: 05/28/2008
Posts: 872
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: BigRightRear on January 24 2013 at 11:55:07 AM

makes sense...but trenching and running copper to meet code - depending on distances) might be less $ than solving run off issues which would include enviro impact / compliance studies in some areas of the country.

sorry to hear about this either way.



Once again, just repeating what is already on the net is various forms, the run off issue is more about flooding the neighbors property than any enviromental (contamination) concern. The recycled shingles are not causing problems with the ground water. They are causing run off issues by either changing the way the water flows or by clogging some drains/run offs in the area. The track itself is built on a top of a hill. Thus, they had fewer rain outs because the pits-parking lots had great drainage and would not flood like so many other tracks. The way it was described on a different thread on elbowsup.com was that the drainage issue was something that could be easily solved.

However, all of my information is several, several times removed. Hopefully, if I am stating anything wrong someone can correct me.



lkracecar
January 24, 2013 at 01:52:57 PM
Joined: 07/01/2007
Posts: 101
Reply

Ok, Here is what I understand happened. Shawn Peterson, #4 Sprint Car Owner/Driver, Millionaire, Print Place Owner, crashes or crashes someone else every time I have seen him run....... Had a disagreement with the Cowtown Promoter and turned them into the City and the rest is History.

The Shingles have been there for years, I want to say since about 2000, and now it's a problem? They have had transformers blow while racing and now it's a problem?

Someone once said, follow the money trail and you will find the real cause.




Dryslick Willie
January 24, 2013 at 03:51:08 PM
Joined: 12/17/2009
Posts: 2254
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: lkracecar on January 24 2013 at 01:52:57 PM

Ok, Here is what I understand happened. Shawn Peterson, #4 Sprint Car Owner/Driver, Millionaire, Print Place Owner, crashes or crashes someone else every time I have seen him run....... Had a disagreement with the Cowtown Promoter and turned them into the City and the rest is History.

The Shingles have been there for years, I want to say since about 2000, and now it's a problem? They have had transformers blow while racing and now it's a problem?

Someone once said, follow the money trail and you will find the real cause.



The shingle issue and it's impact on the drainage would definetly have to be remedied. As far as I know, that would fall on the property owner. If my memory serves me correctly, the shingles got laid down back when the owner's daughter and son-in-law ran the track for a short time. There are many people who think Shawn Petersen is the cause of all of this. Have no idea how true that is, or if it's true at all. Lotsa people smelling rats though.

JonR
January 24, 2013 at 06:18:13 PM
Joined: 05/28/2008
Posts: 872
Reply

I know several people believe that all of the problems at the track can be attributed to one person. However, I do not buy into this theory. Not evertything in racing has to have a conspircacy theory attached to it. The city of Kennedale updating all of the electrical meters to smart meters seems more realistic to me than a jilted driver calling the city and the city dreaming up a reason to close the track because the jilted driver has a lot of money.



Eric Smith
January 25, 2013 at 05:07:21 AM
Joined: 11/29/2011
Posts: 244
Reply

Side by side and they run the same nights? They say everything is bigger in Texas. Clearly that does not apply to brains.


.  


Dryslick Willie
January 25, 2013 at 07:00:13 AM
Joined: 12/17/2009
Posts: 2254
Reply
This message was edited on January 25, 2013 at 07:02:14 AM by Dryslick Willie
Reply to:
Posted By: Eric Smith on January 25 2013 at 05:07:21 AM

Side by side and they run the same nights? They say everything is bigger in Texas. Clearly that does not apply to brains.



You have that right Eric. This deal was as dumb as it gets. The D/FW area has eight dirt tracks, actually seven now if Cowtown is closed for good. They probably need at least two more to be closed. There are too many tracks, too many classes, and yet noone can seem to figure out why the tracks are struggling to survive with low car counts and noone in the stands. Kennedale Speedway should never have been built. It happened because some yahoo with more money than sense got mad at Cowtown. The promoter at Cowtown (back in the late nineties) lost the track in a divorce settlement. The track was padlocked for a few weeks and didn't race while that was straightened out. That's when the track owner's daughter and son-in-law stepped in. During that same time frame, this dude went to Cowtown's owner and wanted to promote the track. The owner said no, so the dude threatened to build another track on the other side of the fence because he already owned the land. And that's exactly what he did, with the thought that he would run Cowtown out of business. Kennedale Speedway loyalists will argue that he just built it to give IMCA racers a place to race, but that's a croc of crud.

TheLatestDirt
January 26, 2013 at 01:40:20 AM
Joined: 01/29/2005
Posts: 24
Reply

There's also a drag strip across the road from the two dirt tracks. My wife and I were passing through the area a few years back,and we decided to drive by the tracks. All three of them were running at the same time! Pretty wild! You could see the drags from the road too!


Dirt is where it's at



Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy