HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: ATTENTION ALL 305 RACERS THROUGHTOUT THE MIDWEST Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 1 of 4   of  77 replies
midwest305
October 30, 2011 at 11:59:32 AM
Joined: 10/27/2011
Posts: 3
Reply

The Midwest 305 Sprint car Association is having a meeting to standardize the engine rules for all 305 racing in the Midwest. A representative from each track or club should try and attend this meeting. We believe this standardization of engine rules will make 305 sprint car divisions stronger. Allowing for more interchange of drivers between tracks and stopping the division from heading down the obvious path of cost destruction.

The meeting will be held on Sunday Nov 6th at 2pm at the following location.
The Happy Chef Restaurant
1550 Broad St
Storey City, IA
Right of I-35
For further information e-mail [email protected]



N.G.
October 30, 2011 at 12:40:27 PM
Joined: 09/14/2008
Posts: 84
Reply
Can I get a phone number my E-mail is jacked up....

VerNo
October 30, 2011 at 04:50:07 PM
Joined: 07/04/2011
Posts: 30
Reply

http://www.midwest305sprintcars.com/Contacts.htm





305 9A
October 30, 2011 at 06:20:37 PM
Joined: 05/03/2010
Posts: 156
Reply

It is extremely important that we ALL get together and get universal, economical, fair, and easily verifiable rules for 305 sprint car racing in the mid-west. If we don't do it soon, the 305's will go the way the 360's have. Too many $$$. I invite any and all of the tracks / clubs to come to our meeting and work on this together.

This is the first step in making 305 sprint car racing economical, safe, and fun for all the competitors.

 



pack
October 30, 2011 at 06:28:51 PM
Joined: 02/06/2010
Posts: 81
Reply
Racesaver!!! Very economical and close racing. I think I seen a Knoxville motor for sale in classifieds for like $17 that is crazy you can find a very nice 360 cheaper than that. I bought a fresh racesaver motor for $4800 race ready.

dmantx
MyWebsite
October 30, 2011 at 06:56:22 PM
Joined: 09/15/2005
Posts: 5183
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: pack on October 30 2011 at 06:28:51 PM
Racesaver!!! Very economical and close racing. I think I seen a Knoxville motor for sale in classifieds for like $17 that is crazy you can find a very nice 360 cheaper than that. I bought a fresh racesaver motor for $4800 race ready.


www.raceSaver.com is the website and tracks in the South that are running them are seeing better and better car counts. We had 59 at the LoneStar Sprint Nationals and they put on good races all weekend long. And as importantly, the fans enjoyed them too. You will most likely receive some resistance from teams that can afford a $17k engine...but the bigger question is why would you spend that much to race that division to begin with. Good luck with your meeting!


pack
October 30, 2011 at 06:57:41 PM
Joined: 02/06/2010
Posts: 81
Reply
Rich daddies buying a win!!!

HRH10
October 30, 2011 at 08:16:20 PM
Joined: 06/08/2011
Posts: 46
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: pack on October 30 2011 at 06:57:41 PM
Rich daddies buying a win!!!


I think this meeting is a great idea. However with what is talked about may change one group or association (track). With the 305's running different rules like Ohio, Burlington (34raceway), Knoxville, and so on there will never be the same rules at them tracks. With whatever rules are made or changed I hope it brings more cars to all the 305 tracks. Also whats the point to limit what you can spend????? (Remember racing cost money, cuz you sure as hell aint gunna make any). Also guys like Brady Bacon, Kevin Swindell and many other YOUNG drivers are winning races because they have the BEST of equipment. (Makes the driving alot easier). Running a racesaver motor is the same as running a late model.......who wants to watch a race like that. So the bottom line is there will always be a faster car than someone else and that person is just gunna complain that some rules need to be changed. Hope the meeting goes good but since we are not a sanctioned group people are gunna build a car to run at a track that they choose.



Sprinter 79
MyWebsite
October 30, 2011 at 11:04:15 PM
Joined: 12/05/2010
Posts: 840
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: HRH10 on October 30 2011 at 08:16:20 PM

I think this meeting is a great idea. However with what is talked about may change one group or association (track). With the 305's running different rules like Ohio, Burlington (34raceway), Knoxville, and so on there will never be the same rules at them tracks. With whatever rules are made or changed I hope it brings more cars to all the 305 tracks. Also whats the point to limit what you can spend????? (Remember racing cost money, cuz you sure as hell aint gunna make any). Also guys like Brady Bacon, Kevin Swindell and many other YOUNG drivers are winning races because they have the BEST of equipment. (Makes the driving alot easier). Running a racesaver motor is the same as running a late model.......who wants to watch a race like that. So the bottom line is there will always be a faster car than someone else and that person is just gunna complain that some rules need to be changed. Hope the meeting goes good but since we are not a sanctioned group people are gunna build a car to run at a track that they choose.



This is exactly why it is important to include the tracks. Also, by limiting what you can spend you entice more folks into racing. More racers = more cars = more fans = bigger purses = better competition. It is win - win for almost everyone! Smaller classes = fewer fans = less pay = dying class! I know of three folks who would love to race a 305, except that they do not want to mortgage their house to be competitive.
Never hit stationary objects!


pack
October 30, 2011 at 11:25:16 PM
Joined: 02/06/2010
Posts: 81
Reply
If you want to spend $20 grand on a motor jump on up to the 360s I have less in my complete racesaver operation including spares than some of these guys have in just a motor and I have a 1 year old roller. If you want new racers or new guys to move up you have to have it where they can afford it. In our area you can run a 305 way cheaper than a mini sprint. All mini sprint drivers want to drive a big car but most just can't afford a 360 so I think Racesaver is the answer.

sprintfn1
October 31, 2011 at 09:03:30 AM
Joined: 07/04/2007
Posts: 321
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Sprinter 79 on October 30 2011 at 11:04:15 PM
This is exactly why it is important to include the tracks. Also, by limiting what you can spend you entice more folks into racing. More racers = more cars = more fans = bigger purses = better competition. It is win - win for almost everyone! Smaller classes = fewer fans = less pay = dying class! I know of three folks who would love to race a 305, except that they do not want to mortgage their house to be competitive.


you are 100% rite 305racing is a startup class and it will survive if it is tightly controled and costs are kept at prices that new people can afford and if all these groups can get rid of their nevitive ways and become one big midwest club, then i feel sure it will continue to grow.



88sprint
October 31, 2011 at 11:16:00 AM
Joined: 08/13/2006
Posts: 347
Reply

What is the "plan" to limit spending by the racers? An engine rule isn't going to limit the cost of racing. People are going to spend money, a LOT of money, on racing. There is no rule that will ever change that. Everyone complains about Knoxville allowing drysumps, but I am 99% certain the 2 motors everyone talks about were not drysump (go to the classifieds and check for yourself). Weight isn't going to stop anything, I see cars all the time with all Ti bolts and chunks of lead strapped on. Don't get me wrong, I am all for saving money, but don't think making a bunch of rules is going to make it cheaper. People are going to spend money, there is always someone who spends a little more than the next. If they can't find anything else to buy for the car, they will go buy a toter and stacker trailer. Wasn't the spec head and tire ASCS branded supposed to make racing cheaper and more equal? I have delivered a set of $10K ASCS heads, how is that cheaper? I am pretty sure the ASCS RR is the most expensive RR spec tire on the market. All the rules usually make it MORE EXPENSIVE. Just look at ASCS and tell me how the rules are working to make it cheaper........

If you want a spec tire, I can understand that. But it needs to be opened up to allow 1 tire from each manufacturer. Only letting 1 company in on the deal isn't going to make it cheaper, it's a perfect way to get prices inflated because you HAVE to run that exact tire. Tell me what would happen if you allowed 1 tire from each manufacturer, if Hoosier was $30 higher than American Racer and they were an equal size and compound, who would you buy from?




kustomincorp
October 31, 2011 at 11:34:19 AM
Joined: 04/12/2009
Posts: 253
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: 88sprint on October 31 2011 at 11:16:00 AM

What is the "plan" to limit spending by the racers? An engine rule isn't going to limit the cost of racing. People are going to spend money, a LOT of money, on racing. There is no rule that will ever change that. Everyone complains about Knoxville allowing drysumps, but I am 99% certain the 2 motors everyone talks about were not drysump (go to the classifieds and check for yourself). Weight isn't going to stop anything, I see cars all the time with all Ti bolts and chunks of lead strapped on. Don't get me wrong, I am all for saving money, but don't think making a bunch of rules is going to make it cheaper. People are going to spend money, there is always someone who spends a little more than the next. If they can't find anything else to buy for the car, they will go buy a toter and stacker trailer. Wasn't the spec head and tire ASCS branded supposed to make racing cheaper and more equal? I have delivered a set of $10K ASCS heads, how is that cheaper? I am pretty sure the ASCS RR is the most expensive RR spec tire on the market. All the rules usually make it MORE EXPENSIVE. Just look at ASCS and tell me how the rules are working to make it cheaper........

If you want a spec tire, I can understand that. But it needs to be opened up to allow 1 tire from each manufacturer. Only letting 1 company in on the deal isn't going to make it cheaper, it's a perfect way to get prices inflated because you HAVE to run that exact tire. Tell me what would happen if you allowed 1 tire from each manufacturer, if Hoosier was $30 higher than American Racer and they were an equal size and compound, who would you buy from?



its not just about how much you can spend ...its also about getting one set of engine specs that can be used for everyone and enforcing them...guys getting away with using roller cam and high comp pistons and big expensive ported heads is doing nothing to grow this class ..if a guy wants to spend big bucks and cheat a bunch of new guys ..he should go race a 360 or a 410.



ecs
MyWebsite
October 31, 2011 at 12:39:11 PM
Joined: 12/23/2008
Posts: 89
Reply
This message was edited on October 31, 2011 at 01:05:00 PM by ecs

It is obvious that we have rules but there only as good as the people enforcing them.

So to stop people from talking about this or that being legal or not you need to tech.







vande77
October 31, 2011 at 12:54:07 PM
Joined: 01/20/2005
Posts: 2079
Reply

It'd help if you did more calling on the phone to tracks and drivers if you want attendance (or even a PRESS RELEASE).

You don't gain much respect from me (as a fan) when you can't even spell the name of the town you are meeting in correctly (its STORY CITY, IA).

Good luck controlling costs, take a look at IMCA as example, guys are spending $15,000 on motors that are supposed to be claimable for $325, guess what, no one is claiming motors because they are all spending a ton of $$ to build their own and they don't want to be the one that starts the avalanche of motors getting claimed every week.




Sprinter 79
MyWebsite
October 31, 2011 at 03:55:45 PM
Joined: 12/05/2010
Posts: 840
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: 88sprint on October 31 2011 at 11:16:00 AM

What is the "plan" to limit spending by the racers? An engine rule isn't going to limit the cost of racing. People are going to spend money, a LOT of money, on racing. There is no rule that will ever change that. Everyone complains about Knoxville allowing drysumps, but I am 99% certain the 2 motors everyone talks about were not drysump (go to the classifieds and check for yourself). Weight isn't going to stop anything, I see cars all the time with all Ti bolts and chunks of lead strapped on. Don't get me wrong, I am all for saving money, but don't think making a bunch of rules is going to make it cheaper. People are going to spend money, there is always someone who spends a little more than the next. If they can't find anything else to buy for the car, they will go buy a toter and stacker trailer. Wasn't the spec head and tire ASCS branded supposed to make racing cheaper and more equal? I have delivered a set of $10K ASCS heads, how is that cheaper? I am pretty sure the ASCS RR is the most expensive RR spec tire on the market. All the rules usually make it MORE EXPENSIVE. Just look at ASCS and tell me how the rules are working to make it cheaper........

If you want a spec tire, I can understand that. But it needs to be opened up to allow 1 tire from each manufacturer. Only letting 1 company in on the deal isn't going to make it cheaper, it's a perfect way to get prices inflated because you HAVE to run that exact tire. Tell me what would happen if you allowed 1 tire from each manufacturer, if Hoosier was $30 higher than American Racer and they were an equal size and compound, who would you buy from?



Well, I have yet to see a toter make a race car faster. Spend what you want, but limit parts that are high $$$$ items. The fall from grace for ASCS is the lack of tech along with rules changes within new clubs & by officials. There are many clubs that are designed for the high $$$$$$$$ side of the sport. Go race there if you have a problem with spec & tech. Otherwise, we need to let the sport grow and stop chasing off start-ups with big $$$$ cars. You know, when you run spec stuff the better drivers will still win. Money is NOT going to put inexperienced or untalented drivers at the front. Most of us will still be back markers, but at least when you have a good night with tighter rules you can expect to be racy, not just faster than last weekend and still chasing your A%#.
Never hit stationary objects!

midwest305
October 31, 2011 at 04:46:01 PM
Joined: 10/27/2011
Posts: 3
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: vande77 on October 31 2011 at 12:54:07 PM

It'd help if you did more calling on the phone to tracks and drivers if you want attendance (or even a PRESS RELEASE).

You don't gain much respect from me (as a fan) when you can't even spell the name of the town you are meeting in correctly (its STORY CITY, IA).

Good luck controlling costs, take a look at IMCA as example, guys are spending $15,000 on motors that are supposed to be claimable for $325, guess what, no one is claiming motors because they are all spending a ton of $$ to build their own and they don't want to be the one that starts the avalanche of motors getting claimed every week.



thanks for the catch



midwest305
October 31, 2011 at 04:50:11 PM
Joined: 10/27/2011
Posts: 3
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: vande77 on October 31 2011 at 12:54:07 PM

It'd help if you did more calling on the phone to tracks and drivers if you want attendance (or even a PRESS RELEASE).

You don't gain much respect from me (as a fan) when you can't even spell the name of the town you are meeting in correctly (its STORY CITY, IA).

Good luck controlling costs, take a look at IMCA as example, guys are spending $15,000 on motors that are supposed to be claimable for $325, guess what, no one is claiming motors because they are all spending a ton of $$ to build their own and they don't want to be the one that starts the avalanche of motors getting claimed every week.



Sorry and Press Relese was yesterday Sunday 30th Oct Front Page Hoseheads




linbob
October 31, 2011 at 05:11:11 PM
Joined: 03/12/2011
Posts: 1657
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: midwest305 on October 30 2011 at 11:59:32 AM

The Midwest 305 Sprint car Association is having a meeting to standardize the engine rules for all 305 racing in the Midwest. A representative from each track or club should try and attend this meeting. We believe this standardization of engine rules will make 305 sprint car divisions stronger. Allowing for more interchange of drivers between tracks and stopping the division from heading down the obvious path of cost destruction.

The meeting will be held on Sunday Nov 6th at 2pm at the following location.
The Happy Chef Restaurant
1550 Broad St
Storey City, IA
Right of I-35
For further information e-mail [email protected]


just because you change rules you will not have to get a new engine. You will only have to change a few parts. I think you have to get this done or 305 racing will become a mess. I think tou must get comitment and change rules in 1 year so people can use up older parts..



ricky bobby
October 31, 2011 at 08:39:30 PM
Joined: 08/08/2006
Posts: 5
Reply
Just exactly what does MW305 bring to the table? They only have a couple real MW305 shows a year, im not counting the shows that are going on as scheduled and somebody just calls them a "MW305" race, and they have a minimal following. MW305 shows get 9 to 12 cars at an event. Knoxville gets 18 to 30 cars a show and they area the ones doing things wrong? Sorry for the mud thrown but I'm sick of listening to the whining.



Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy