|
|
Topic: DART SHP block
|
Email this topic to a friend |
Subscribe to this Topic
| Report this Topic to Moderator
|
Page 1 of 1 of 4 replies
|
|
|
October 05, 2011 at
04:08:12 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
03/12/2011
|
Posts:
|
1656
|
|
|
Has others had the Dart shp block fail. Locally we saw two blocks fail. One in stock car and one in 360 sprint. Both had about 7 races on them. Both new this year. Both blocks had cy. wall on #4 cy have a hole size of fist fall into water jacket. Rods were in one piece so rod never failed . It is sort of strange that both blocks failed the exact same.
|
|
|
October 05, 2011 at
08:37:40 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
02/04/2011
|
Posts:
|
4
|
|
|
My question would be was it bored too large? And were they running a shorter rod? A shorter rod makes the piston scub the cylinder wall harder. If bored too much, the walls get thin and weak enough that the rod can push the piston through the wall. Im curious to know because I have one of these blocks and haven't started building yet.
|
|
|
October 06, 2011 at
10:57:00 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
12/09/2004
|
Posts:
|
339
|
|
|
Simple case of you get what you pay for!
Rome wasn't built in a day......but they sure didn't
waste any time burning it down!
|
|
|
|
October 06, 2011 at
11:47:52 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
06/19/2009
|
Posts:
|
98
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: mbmotorspt on October 06 2011 at 10:57:00 AM
Simple case of you get what you pay for!
|
Nothing wrong with the SHP blocks from Dart. I know of 3 ASCS sprint motors built using the SHP blocks, and staying together and running upfront. Down side is you can't lighten them up much, and they have minor differences in the priority oiling.
|
|
|
October 11, 2011 at
03:07:16 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
10/07/2011
|
Posts:
|
18
|
|
|
I'm running a 358 motor with the SHP. No issues so far. New block this year.
<crossing fingers>
EngiNERD
Performance
|
|