|
|
Topic: LS Sprint Car Engine Presentation & Info is now available for viewing
|
Email this topic to a friend |
Subscribe to this Topic
| Report this Topic to Moderator
|
Page 1 of 2 of 38 replies
|
|
|
August 15, 2010 at
09:30:44 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
11/23/2004
|
Posts:
|
2821
|
|
|
This message was edited on
August 15, 2010 at
09:40:40 PM by Hawker
On Friday, August, 13th 2010 at Knoxville, IA during the Nationals, there was a presentation on the new LS Sprint Car engine developed by Ron Shaver with the help of Danny & Donny Schatz that people have been talking about for the past several weeks. Go to www.openwheel.org to see the details, video and photos of the engine/presentation.
Member of this message board since 1997
|
|
|
August 16, 2010 at
01:24:39 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
11/23/2004
|
Posts:
|
2821
|
|
|
As a side note... Even though he was not eligible to run the Kele World Challenge, Donny Schatz was allowed to tag the rear of the field to see how this engine would fare against the 410's on a big 1/2 mile. He passed numerous cars (maybe 8 or 10) on both the high and low groove. Also, before anyone cries afoul, he forfeited all money in the race to run the car.
Member of this message board since 1997
|
|
|
August 16, 2010 at
01:38:16 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
08/09/2009
|
Posts:
|
506
|
|
|
It sounds like this may be a great step in bringing down the cost of race engines. Hope it works before anyone's car counts go down more than it has already.
Here is something to kick around...If this motor is in the ball park of a good 360 motor, price wise, would we still need to have a 360 series? That would make for awesome car counts everywhere and we still have the 305's as an entry level as long as they keep them from getting out of hand. Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2010 at
01:51:20 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
01/31/2010
|
Posts:
|
1476
|
|
|
Good track to test an engine.
Don't know about the logic of doing it during the Nationals in a race where "others" are racing for position and money!
TSA...It's not a GROPE...it's a Freedom Pat!
|
|
|
August 16, 2010 at
02:42:10 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
11/23/2004
|
Posts:
|
2821
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: origopnwhlr on August 16 2010 at 01:51:20 PM
Good track to test an engine.
Don't know about the logic of doing it during the Nationals in a race where "others" are racing for position and money!
|
He never ran anyone else's line. If the cars ahead were high, he was low, if they were low, he was high. Everyone agreed to let him run it. All he was trying to do was to get a good long run on the engine on a "taxing" track.
Member of this message board since 1997
|
|
|
August 16, 2010 at
02:45:02 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
01/31/2010
|
Posts:
|
1476
|
|
|
Well, as long as he had a "Dozen Dunkins" delivered to each team after the race I will let this one slip by! 
TSA...It's not a GROPE...it's a Freedom Pat!
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2010 at
09:53:23 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
11/30/2004
|
Posts:
|
456
|
|
|
Here's the direct link to the presentation: http://www.openwheel.org/ls.html
^ SkyRaider Ultralight -> ELSA
|
|
|
August 18, 2010 at
05:55:55 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
08/07/2008
|
Posts:
|
123
|
|
|
Man it really kills me that this topic doesn't generate more interest in this forum. I guess it just proves how few real sprint car drivers, owners and real fans are left in this forum. This is something that could really change sprint cars. Think about a chance to have a single motor across the board. I could run my local shows that were 360's but still be able to go race the Nationals and have the same motor as everyone else does. I guess the people that frequent this forum would rather argue about blow up dolls and weather TK was drunk and attacking kids with leaf blowers. Please can with have some REAL content on this forum for once.
Thank you!!!
|
|
|
August 18, 2010 at
07:00:35 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
04/30/2005
|
Posts:
|
677
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: origopnwhlr on August 16 2010 at 01:51:20 PM
Good track to test an engine.
Don't know about the logic of doing it during the Nationals in a race where "others" are racing for position and money!
|
He did not take any money
The drivers agreed to let him
Being to picky
|
|
|
|
August 18, 2010 at
07:35:20 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
01/09/2009
|
Posts:
|
121
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: Hawg Wild on August 18 2010 at 05:55:55 AM
Man it really kills me that this topic doesn't generate more interest in this forum. I guess it just proves how few real sprint car drivers, owners and real fans are left in this forum. This is something that could really change sprint cars. Think about a chance to have a single motor across the board. I could run my local shows that were 360's but still be able to go race the Nationals and have the same motor as everyone else does. I guess the people that frequent this forum would rather argue about blow up dolls and weather TK was drunk and attacking kids with leaf blowers. Please can with have some REAL content on this forum for once.
Thank you!!!
|
Wow, I agree 100% and almost posted the same thing a couple days ago. I can't believe more people aren't talking about this engine package.
Question: It's 420-something c.i.d and they stated it's not intended to replace the current WoO 410 type engine but rather an affordable alternative for the local guy. Is their assumption that the 410 limit will be raised to accommodate this engine?
I suppose another route would be a track or series adopt this package. I don't like that route as it would lead to all the problems evident with the crate LM's (sealing, cheating, certifications, etc).
If this were legal under current 410 rules, I have to think guys would be taking a darn hard look at it. 750hp, 25 races to a refresh, and a $20k price tag. For local & regional racing on 1/4 and 3/8 tracks that normally turn dry slick, this would be the perfect engine (at least for those of us where money IS an object).
|
|
|
August 18, 2010 at
07:36:08 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
01/22/2009
|
Posts:
|
185
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: Lefty Wilbury on August 16 2010 at 01:38:16 PM
It sounds like this may be a great step in bringing down the cost of race engines. Hope it works before anyone's car counts go down more than it has already.
Here is something to kick around...If this motor is in the ball park of a good 360 motor, price wise, would we still need to have a 360 series? That would make for awesome car counts everywhere and we still have the 305's as an entry level as long as they keep them from getting out of hand. Just a thought.
|
Correct me if i am wrong but i was under the impression that the cost of a good 360 motor is relatively close to that of a 410. I am not sure so don't yell at me. Seems to me the only difference is cubic inches, all the parts still cost the same. This spec motor deal is a great idea if they can police it.
|
|
|
August 18, 2010 at
09:25:21 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
04/19/2009
|
Posts:
|
114
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: wingtree on August 18 2010 at 07:35:20 AM
Wow, I agree 100% and almost posted the same thing a couple days ago. I can't believe more people aren't talking about this engine package.
Question: It's 420-something c.i.d and they stated it's not intended to replace the current WoO 410 type engine but rather an affordable alternative for the local guy. Is their assumption that the 410 limit will be raised to accommodate this engine?
I suppose another route would be a track or series adopt this package. I don't like that route as it would lead to all the problems evident with the crate LM's (sealing, cheating, certifications, etc).
If this were legal under current 410 rules, I have to think guys would be taking a darn hard look at it. 750hp, 25 races to a refresh, and a $20k price tag. For local & regional racing on 1/4 and 3/8 tracks that normally turn dry slick, this would be the perfect engine (at least for those of us where money IS an object).
|
If you want to bring the cost down there are simple ways to do so. Lower the compression numbers to 13 or so to 1 . That is the biggest killer of the 410 motor. With this lower c.r. 25 nites is no problem except maybe springs. You could also look at a smaller injector or small tube headers to take the big heads down a notch.
|
|
|
|
August 18, 2010 at
09:36:58 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
04/10/2007
|
Posts:
|
949
|
|
|
Why would the racing comunity get all amped up over this...it's still an unproven race package...these guys are looking for someone else to run this package and find out what the real flws-problems are over long term race conditions and multipul rebuilds....time after time you find this happen-good idea, but will it work long term.....besides check around ..you can buy a good used /fresh 410 producing the same H.P. for 1/3 the new cost of this motor..and neither are competitive unless the track slicks off..so as long as a money guy is allowed to run the latest and greatest ..most won't want to compete..besides Schatz says around$13000,,next guy $15500..Shaver $20k plus the bullshit never ends..if you ever delt with a engine builder you'd know what I mean
|
|
|
August 18, 2010 at
10:17:20 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
07/07/2010
|
Posts:
|
57
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: BUGSKANDT on August 18 2010 at 07:36:08 AM
Correct me if i am wrong but i was under the impression that the cost of a good 360 motor is relatively close to that of a 410. I am not sure so don't yell at me. Seems to me the only difference is cubic inches, all the parts still cost the same. This spec motor deal is a great idea if they can police it.
|
The price is comparable. The price of a STRONG 360 runs close to the price of an AVERAGE 410 (not a WoO quality 410). The major breaking point is the rebuild. We get 20+ races out of our 360. The 410 guys I know claim 6-12 nights on their 410s. So over the long haul, the rebuild cost can break teams.
And contrary to many of the "360 haters" beliefs, cost isn't the only factor for the teams. I live in an area where there are only 2 (maybe) 410 shows a year, and both are WoO races. Impracticable for us to buy and maintain a 410 to run a few times a year, until we find additional funding that is.
As for this idea, I think it has great potential, but many unknowns as has been stated. It will take a promoter, engine builder, or GM to pick it up and run with it if we are ever going to know it's true potential.
Good conversation...
|
|
|
August 18, 2010 at
11:15:20 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
04/10/2008
|
Posts:
|
107
|
|
|
It seems to me that, for this to work, there will need to be tracks in convenient locations, working together, to form a series for these motors. For example, the Interstate 29 tracks at Grand Forks, Fargo and Husets could work together. Also possible would be Interstate 90 tracks of Hartford, Husets and Jackson. If you get 2-3 tracks within reasonable distance of each other, working together, you could arrange a series combining the tracks for one point fund and less travel for the race teams.
|
|
|
|
August 18, 2010 at
11:44:46 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
11/30/2004
|
Posts:
|
504
|
|
|
Anyone have an idea what a set of injectors would
add horsepower wise, compared to
the 740 their getting with the ancient TBI
system?
|
|
|
August 18, 2010 at
12:06:10 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
08/09/2008
|
Posts:
|
500
|
|
|
I like Hawg's post. A LOT.
I think the people that whine about 410s or they are done with racing, where were they when 430s were outlawed??? Had they already quit the racing game when 500 ci big blocks were banned? That's 2 WoO ci rules for those of you counting at home.
Way too much testosterone is flowing with people that don't matter if you ask me. 360? 410? 430? 550?
Who cares if it's Sammy and Steve and Saldana and Schatz and Sides and man that's a lot of S's out there. WHO CARES? Do you see drivers like that at the Chili Bowl and come away whining about cubic inches? Me neither.
We like competition. We like RACING. If it was half a second slower... WHO CARES??? It isn't about the all-time fastest lap.. .it's about passing and racing. People that want the fastest ever lap must go home after time trials I guess.
ANYTHING that creates car count by reducing costs... I like it and hope that the decision makers look into it. You'll have people on a budget that will complain because they run home-built stuff and won't be able to afford new parts for new rules. So be it. It happens. In a year, when everyone has run the stuff for R&D... those same people will be able to buy used parts & will be right back in the game. Almost like a cycle... huh?
Kudos to people that think outside the box and aren't stuck in the "that's the way we've always done it" rut. Times change and we evolve or we disappear.
|
|
|
August 18, 2010 at
07:20:28 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
12/03/2004
|
Posts:
|
517
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: vanh on August 18 2010 at 07:00:35 AM
He did not take any money
The drivers agreed to let him
Being to picky
|
If I were in that race running a 410 and was passed by a Corvette powered sprint car I would want them to keep the money and would be too embarassed to complain or even talk about it. Donnie is WAY beyond needing to help try to slove any sprint cost issues and deserves credit for taking the time to help out. Being too picky is a massive understatement.
|
|
|
|
August 18, 2010 at
09:08:26 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
11/30/2004
|
Posts:
|
405
|
|
|
I sure hope this idea works out, just as long as they don't put a flywheel on it then forget it.
|
|
|
August 19, 2010 at
12:48:57 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
05/17/2008
|
Posts:
|
531
|
|
|
The ball is in the racers and fans court. The Schatz's and Ron Shaver have done the "foot work" to show everyone that engines can be built "on the cheap" to help bring the cars back and run competitively. Less than 10 years ago, the 410's were putting out these same numbers and the price wasn't a whole lot less than what we see now.
This is a no brainer people, but until the powers that be wake up and listen to the owners and the fans, this will fall by the wayside. From someone who was at this presentation, I can tell you that the manufacturers of the “bolt on” parts and a couple of engine builders were VERY much against this engine, saying it will only bring “instability” to the sport. If you were to hear their side, it is the beginning of the end of sprint car racing. They were firmly in the belief that everything in “big time” sprint car racing is just fine, it’s just the economy that is making teams sell out.I have seen/heard the argument that a person can go buy an old -12 engine and run it for close to the same price, but that engine is 10 years old and has been thrashed, no matter how “fresh” it is, the block and heads have still been ran hard over the years and you will still be spending $5k to $8k to re-fresh it every 10 to 14 nights (for the budget racers). It just doesn’t make sense when you can buy a brand new engine for $20k and freshen it at a cost of $2500 to $3000 per YEAR (25 to 30 nights) with the same "numbers".My suggestion is for every car owner, driver and fan who thinks that this engine is a good idea, to either write an email, pick up the phone, or personally talk to your track owners, promoters, sanction leaders and competition directors to let them know that you support this engine and everything it stands for.
|
|