HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: woo/run what you brung Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 1 of 2   of  22 replies
springfieldrace1
December 25, 2008 at 08:01:39 AM
Joined: 01/14/2008
Posts: 60
Reply

What ever happen to the days when it was bring what you want to run. They made all these rules to keep the cost down it sure doesn't look like it is working.




new-parts
December 25, 2008 at 09:10:33 AM
Joined: 11/30/2004
Posts: 504
Reply
This message was edited on December 25, 2008 at 09:12:00 AM by new-parts

"Run What You Brung"

The WoO started out that way, ran with and without wings, any engine, any tire etc, but then they the stacked the sprint car racing deck with the LIMITED ENGINE and many other rules in their favor and everyone else followed.

“But, believe it or not in 1980 we had a thousand horsepower from a 560 inch big block”
“The horsepower completely overcame everything we could do but, when the Outlaws came up there the Big Blocks would definitely give them you know what, they couldn’t keep up, that’s why the rule change.” (410 Limit)
-Ron Shaver

"Well, around here it was "run what you brung" and the cheapest horsepower at that time was the big block. They weren't the easiest things in the world to drive, but they put out raw horsepower. A little guy could go down the straightaway with anybody with a big block. They ran them, well, the whole way through that period of time. The small block was still 9 out of 10. I got my first aluminum big block in '78, when we weren't going real good. We got it for $300. It was an old ZL1 all aluminum block. We put sleeves and stuff in it. In '79, we beat the Outlaws with it. Then somewhere they tried... they kept fiddling with the rules. We started "run what you brung" around here under small wings. Of course, the Outlaws came along bitched our wings were too small. Then we went to the big wings, which was probably a mistake. But, for national unity, we did it. Two years later, they said our motors were too big. Now, you couldn't have it both ways. You know what I mean? I told Ted Johnson that, you know... I said, "Look. What's good for you Outlaws isn't what's always best for us. Just remember that."
-Lynn Paxton

 



crazyfatcat
December 25, 2008 at 09:58:19 AM
Joined: 12/02/2008
Posts: 6
Reply

SMRS midgets are open on engines and tires. There are some v6's and maybe some v8's this year. At least this gives a chance to come up wuth cheap horse power. You still can't beat the $40,000 dollar engine, if it happens there will be a lot of crying.




team wright-one
MyWebsite
December 25, 2008 at 06:31:06 PM
Joined: 11/29/2005
Posts: 1773
Reply
This message was edited on December 25, 2008 at 07:41:54 PM by team wright-one
Reply to:
Posted By: new-parts on December 25 2008 at 09:10:33 AM

"Run What You Brung"

The WoO started out that way, ran with and without wings, any engine, any tire etc, but then they the stacked the sprint car racing deck with the LIMITED ENGINE and many other rules in their favor and everyone else followed.

“But, believe it or not in 1980 we had a thousand horsepower from a 560 inch big block”
“The horsepower completely overcame everything we could do but, when the Outlaws came up there the Big Blocks would definitely give them you know what, they couldn’t keep up, that’s why the rule change.” (410 Limit)
-Ron Shaver

"Well, around here it was "run what you brung" and the cheapest horsepower at that time was the big block. They weren't the easiest things in the world to drive, but they put out raw horsepower. A little guy could go down the straightaway with anybody with a big block. They ran them, well, the whole way through that period of time. The small block was still 9 out of 10. I got my first aluminum big block in '78, when we weren't going real good. We got it for $300. It was an old ZL1 all aluminum block. We put sleeves and stuff in it. In '79, we beat the Outlaws with it. Then somewhere they tried... they kept fiddling with the rules. We started "run what you brung" around here under small wings. Of course, the Outlaws came along bitched our wings were too small. Then we went to the big wings, which was probably a mistake. But, for national unity, we did it. Two years later, they said our motors were too big. Now, you couldn't have it both ways. You know what I mean? I told Ted Johnson that, you know... I said, "Look. What's good for you Outlaws isn't what's always best for us. Just remember that."
-Lynn Paxton

 



the sprint car community made rule changes to standarize things so teams could travel accross the country and pretty much compete with what they raced at their home track. it was done so teams would not have to spend money on stuff they didn't normally use just to compete somewhere else. not to try to argue with ronnie, but the same is pretty much true for the 410 rule. the outlaw teams had bad ass big blocks but most everywhere else in the country but PA didn't run them. it was hard to get local teams to run against them when they had the big blocks plus the outlaws had to run by the local rules in the day. to make it easier on outlaw teams financially the 410 rule was adopted for the woo. that meant those teams didn't have to carry small block 430's, big blocks, steel blocks, alum blocks, ect for different engine rules accross the country. if you wanted to run with the outlaws when they came to town you better have a 410 or less. the rest of the country standardized and that was the best thing they ever did. it meant a team could take off and race around the country with their local car and be legal pretty much everywhere. it was done as a cost savings for the woo guys so they didn't have to have so many different motors. as i said the standardizing of rules open up the door for it to be more affordable for the local guy to take off accross the country and race with the stuff he already had.

now i said i wasn't trying to argue with ronnie about the big block thing, i am just saying what has always been relatd to me about it.

if we are talking about ways to try to make things cheeper then eliminating titanium seems a good place to start. no ti nowhere. no bolts, rotor, parts of any kind. that would cut the cost. heck part of the cost of an outlaw motor is all the ti bolts and stuff in it. you guys are looking at the cars and trying to cut costs. what about shock dyno's and flow benches and torsion bar dyno's and other things teams spend big money on. messing with shocks had gotten to be a big part of sprint racing. teams are spending big money to fine tune their shock program. not all teams, especially local teams can afford all the technical gizmos. what about big tow rigs? you gonna try to limit that too?

i am seeing polls on here that want to limit stuff with the idea that if you unhook the cars then you won't need the HP so then you won't have to spend as much money on them. then i hear guys say go unlimited cause you can make more power cheaper. wtf? i thought i just heard that we were trying to limit the need for HP. some of you are so f'd up you can't keep up with your own ideas! i hear all the time that things were better back in the day. well back in the day that most of you are refering to there were not a lot of goofy rules and small blocks were the motor of choice. PA was about the only big block place. and if you guys want big blocks, run them. you all hate the woo any way. why even run their rules. do wtf you want and stop bitch'in. why do you even give a f'k what everyone else does? just run your own deal and limit yourself to your local racers and local races. make your own rules and then you will not have to worry about what the woo or anyone else does. the only reason you guys are bitching is cause the outlaws kick your butt all the time and you are thinking you may have a chance if you change the rules. you think they can't beat you then too?merry christmas.



carol14
December 26, 2008 at 06:00:11 AM
Joined: 12/01/2004
Posts: 634
Reply

Any time Tommy Johnson & John Gano (remember "The Elk" ?  "Moose" - whatever that was called with the wild wing(s)?   The crazy car at Knoxville many years ago) came up with something different the WOO would outlaw it.  I believe they were doing this even when they were "open" on their rules.

One big problem I still see is promoters having a set of rules for their locals to run so that they can't compete much of anywhere else.   I guess there's really no good answer to keep it less expensive but competitive... unless we go to really small wings or no wings and narrow tires.  That way the big motors couldn't get the power to the ground anyway.  But I guess that is regression.  We shouldn't have to go back to the Fronty Fords.  Smile



nodust
MyWebsite
December 26, 2008 at 07:54:43 AM
Joined: 11/26/2004
Posts: 3334
Reply

Carmen Manzardo's car was a bit different also!


Save your butt, get a colon screening TODAY

For complete line of Sponsor Awards check out 
MarshallTownLaser.com

Duane Davis

Laser Engraving 
641-751-7777
101 N Center
Marshalltown, Iowa 


new-parts
December 26, 2008 at 11:21:15 AM
Joined: 11/30/2004
Posts: 504
Reply
This message was edited on December 26, 2008 at 01:20:28 PM by new-parts

"i am seeing polls on here that want to limit stuff with the idea that if you unhook the cars then you won't need the HP so then you won't have to spend as much money on them. then i hear guys say go unlimited cause you can make more power cheaper. wtf? i thought i just heard that we were trying to limit the need for HP."
-team wright-one

Its not make more power cheaper with an unlimited engine, its make the same power cheaper with an unlimited engine if you are overpowering the track by unhooking them.
With Respect,
Don





brian26
December 26, 2008 at 12:57:05 PM
Joined: 12/03/2006
Posts: 7918
Reply
This message was edited on December 26, 2008 at 12:59:29 PM by brian26
Reply to:
Posted By: carol14 on December 26 2008 at 06:00:11 AM

Any time Tommy Johnson & John Gano (remember "The Elk" ?  "Moose" - whatever that was called with the wild wing(s)?   The crazy car at Knoxville many years ago) came up with something different the WOO would outlaw it.  I believe they were doing this even when they were "open" on their rules.

One big problem I still see is promoters having a set of rules for their locals to run so that they can't compete much of anywhere else.   I guess there's really no good answer to keep it less expensive but competitive... unless we go to really small wings or no wings and narrow tires.  That way the big motors couldn't get the power to the ground anyway.  But I guess that is regression.  We shouldn't have to go back to the Fronty Fords.  Smile



JDsprint71 showed me pics that proved an old story I heard about the Tommy Johnson car.

The road to here-

tommyjohnson.jpg picture by brian26_photos_2007




brian26
December 26, 2008 at 01:00:02 PM
Joined: 12/03/2006
Posts: 7918
Reply
This message was edited on December 26, 2008 at 01:03:55 PM by brian26

Started with one of these-

Keep in mind a few "revisions" came along with the ideas. I saw pics of a roadster with a big right rear, wing,etc. The final version may not even have had an original roadster piece on it but, the whole thing started with an old roadster.

1960-watson-indy-roadster.jpg picture by brian26_photos_2007





speedracer14
December 26, 2008 at 02:57:53 PM
Joined: 12/03/2004
Posts: 117
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: brian26 on December 26 2008 at 01:00:02 PM

Started with one of these-

Keep in mind a few "revisions" came along with the ideas. I saw pics of a roadster with a big right rear, wing,etc. The final version may not even have had an original roadster piece on it but, the whole thing started with an old roadster.

1960-watson-indy-roadster.jpg picture by brian26_photos_2007



SWEET, now that is a racecar!



Murphy
December 26, 2008 at 06:02:08 PM
Joined: 05/26/2005
Posts: 3328
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: brian26 on December 26 2008 at 12:57:05 PM

JDsprint71 showed me pics that proved an old story I heard about the Tommy Johnson car.

The road to here-

tommyjohnson.jpg picture by brian26_photos_2007



I don't recall ever reading that this car, or anything about it was ever outlawed by anybody. Best guess, is that it just wasn't as fast as the other cars.



butchknouse37
December 26, 2008 at 06:32:09 PM
Joined: 03/11/2005
Posts: 520
Reply
If it had WORKED they WOULD have outlawed it.


brian26
December 26, 2008 at 06:42:43 PM
Joined: 12/03/2006
Posts: 7918
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: brian26 on December 26 2008 at 12:57:05 PM

JDsprint71 showed me pics that proved an old story I heard about the Tommy Johnson car.

The road to here-

tommyjohnson.jpg picture by brian26_photos_2007



This car came along when the "homogenizing" of sprint car racing was in full swing. It like a few others was no longer acceptable with the new WoO rules in place.

It was never fully developed, yet there are some things on this car that are being done today. There was still a lot experimentation going on in the '80s no one remembers.

IE- Carmen Manzardo.........................yes Nodust, I read your post.

 

I really wish someone would bring out the history of this car and it's fate once and for all.

 

 




filtalr
December 26, 2008 at 07:31:50 PM
Joined: 01/06/2005
Posts: 1872
Reply

Looks like the only part of the roadster left is a small piece of the tail tank. That thing would have been wicked fast if it would have worked right - a case of "looks good on paper"...


Phil Taylor

home-theater-systems-advice.com


Kamshaft
December 26, 2008 at 10:31:35 PM
Joined: 12/01/2004
Posts: 229
Reply
This message was edited on December 26, 2008 at 10:34:19 PM by Kamshaft
Reply to:
Posted By: brian26 on December 26 2008 at 12:57:05 PM

JDsprint71 showed me pics that proved an old story I heard about the Tommy Johnson car.

The road to here-

tommyjohnson.jpg picture by brian26_photos_2007



One thing I notice about this car that makes it a real racecar in my eyes, is the fact that it doesn't have a stinkin' muffler on it! Mufflers suck! And it even has a turned up elbow on the header! To better disperse the loudness to the waiting ears.




brian26
December 26, 2008 at 11:13:48 PM
Joined: 12/03/2006
Posts: 7918
Reply

I'm really hoping they didn't just cut up a roadster, maybe they went to a new frame along the way.




cubicdollars
December 26, 2008 at 11:54:25 PM
Joined: 02/27/2005
Posts: 4443
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: springfieldrace1 on December 25 2008 at 08:01:39 AM

What ever happen to the days when it was bring what you want to run. They made all these rules to keep the cost down it sure doesn't look like it is working.



The unlimited super late models have grown in popularity over the years since adopting smaller tire and spoiler rules. The sprint cars decided to limit the engines instead and it's haunted them ever since.


 

 

 

They don't even know how to spell sprint car much less chromoly...http://www.ycmco.com


sprint19
December 27, 2008 at 09:21:00 AM
Joined: 07/15/2005
Posts: 185
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: brian26 on December 26 2008 at 12:57:05 PM

JDsprint71 showed me pics that proved an old story I heard about the Tommy Johnson car.

The road to here-

tommyjohnson.jpg picture by brian26_photos_2007



Definitely gets the Ugly Award. Does not look too safe either. A lot of crap to enter the driver area with little protection.




Grove
MyWebsite
December 27, 2008 at 12:03:20 PM
Joined: 01/28/2005
Posts: 332
Reply

I saw the "Ugly Award" car at the Nationals in I think '88. It was surprisingly competitive in the

corners but wagged it's butt in the straights. It was smaller and underpowered. Some bizarre ideas.

Wasn't it built by some non-racing aero engineers?

 

 



Sprnt12
MyWebsite
December 27, 2008 at 12:20:01 PM
Joined: 12/06/2004
Posts: 191
Reply

If I remember right he finished 3rd in his heat ahead of S Kinser.


Sprints rule



Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy