HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: High Limit Allstar tour Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 7 of 7   of  135 replies
Murphy
October 30, 2023 at 05:53:06 PM
Joined: 05/26/2005
Posts: 3848
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: tireman on October 29 2023 at 10:10:00 PM

Open tire rule:  several top racing groups have tried open tire rule.   I believe that in the major sanctioning groups, with in their divisions that tried "open tire" or gave a choice of different manufacturers, were not pleased with the reults and went back to a single source and type(s).  

 



Any thoughts about what they weren't pleased with? 

I've always wondered why a simple rule that required a minimum tire hardness before and after a race wouldn't work.



Parnelli1970
November 01, 2023 at 09:27:10 AM
Joined: 07/15/2023
Posts: 831
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: on at


Not really just the same old tired opinions.



StanM
MyResults MyPressRelease
November 01, 2023 at 10:35:17 AM
Joined: 11/07/2006
Posts: 5737
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Go4wide on October 27 2023 at 12:11:43 AM

I don't know enough to agree or disagreel with your post. I do know I've attended 3 Chili Bowls. In recent years I've relied on Flo. Whether I'm there, or not, those stands are full, especially later in the week. Streaming lets those of us that can't attend see the action. Maybe some of us will attend a future event. I think the same situation is true with the Knoxville Nationals. Full stands but many thousand more watching online. Traveling series can use streaming to entice people to come to an event near them. Flo is a bargain and I expect to see an increase in the annual fee sometime soon. DirVision is way too expensive for me so I completely miss at WoO events. I don't see the value, especially compared to Flo.



Flo will not raise their price as the have the luxury of thousands of subscribers for all the other sports they cover.  Basically Flo is a streaming sports channel, Dirtvision is a streaming racing channel that offers one sport.  FloSports has deeper pockets.

 


Stan Meissner


longtimefan
November 01, 2023 at 11:07:09 AM
Joined: 12/02/2004
Posts: 1054
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: StanM on November 01 2023 at 10:35:17 AM

Flo will not raise their price as the have the luxury of thousands of subscribers for all the other sports they cover.  Basically Flo is a streaming sports channel, Dirtvision is a streaming racing channel that offers one sport.  FloSports has deeper pockets.

 



They might not raise their price to subscribe but they will raise the amount that they pay the tracks or have fewer racing options.



beezr2002
November 01, 2023 at 11:19:35 AM
Joined: 04/21/2017
Posts: 1246
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: StanM on November 01 2023 at 10:35:17 AM

Flo will not raise their price as the have the luxury of thousands of subscribers for all the other sports they cover.  Basically Flo is a streaming sports channel, Dirtvision is a streaming racing channel that offers one sport.  FloSports has deeper pockets.

 



My FLO subscription has went up 10 dollars each of the past two years, not a deal breaker.



tenter
November 01, 2023 at 04:20:41 PM
Joined: 07/16/2008
Posts: 1058
Reply

Fact.

 

 

I just wanted to see what it's like to say it.




Parnelli1970
November 01, 2023 at 04:43:14 PM
Joined: 07/15/2023
Posts: 831
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: on at


Do you look at yourself in the mirror when you type your bullshit.



racingmoose
November 01, 2023 at 06:55:21 PM
Joined: 06/17/2022
Posts: 75
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: on at


Amazing how you twisted that around.  No wonder nobody seems to take you seriously.



revjimk
November 01, 2023 at 08:42:22 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7997
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: on at


You just proved him right... in love with your own OPINIONS




Murphy
November 01, 2023 at 09:04:14 PM
Joined: 05/26/2005
Posts: 3848
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: on at


I've started reading Strowser's posts in the voice of Pee Wee Herman. They're easier to put into context that way. Smile



Parnelli1970
November 01, 2023 at 09:49:36 PM
Joined: 07/15/2023
Posts: 831
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Murphy on November 01 2023 at 09:04:14 PM

I've started reading Strowser's posts in the voice of Pee Wee Herman. They're easier to put into context that way. Smile



It's like communicating with a 5 year old who throws a tantrum about not getting his chicken tenders.



revjimk
November 02, 2023 at 12:05:35 AM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7997
Reply
This message was edited on November 02, 2023 at 12:06:36 AM by revjimk
Reply to:
Posted By: Murphy on November 01 2023 at 09:04:14 PM

I've started reading Strowser's posts in the voice of Pee Wee Herman. They're easier to put into context that way. Smile



Strawser in the HH's bar?

Nah. Peewee dances better.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVKsd8z6scw




hardon
November 02, 2023 at 12:32:03 AM
Joined: 02/20/2005
Posts: 548
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Murphy on October 30 2023 at 05:53:06 PM

Any thoughts about what they weren't pleased with? 

I've always wondered why a simple rule that required a minimum tire hardness before and after a race wouldn't work.



Murphy, I almost always believe that a "free market" aproach means that everyone wins.  Since businesses need to be competetive with each other, typically better products with better prices will come out.  The one (or the only one I can think of right now) exception is racing tires.  This youtube video is a very interesting watch as to why it doesn't work https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eu5b8oYwiQM .  If you don't want to watch it, I'll try to remember the main bullet points.  Goodyear was purchased by some company and NASCAR was concerned that this company might not want to make racing tires anymore.  They asked Hoosier to get involved.  They allowed both Goodyear and Hoosier to provide tires at every race, I think the years were 88-89 and then again in 94.  But the one rule they had was BOTH manufacturers had to bring enough tires to every race for EVERYONE.  It was not just the people who had contracts to run their tires, EVERYONE.  As I'm sure everyone can see, this is a huge expense to bring semi truck loads of tires that might not get used at all.  Not sure how much they got into it but the "competition" started coming out, and both Goodyear and Hoosier were trying to make faster tires.  We all know what a faster tire means.  The thing I still remember about this video that I think is hilarious is niether Goodyear or Hoosier would call their blowouts "blowouts", they would refer to a blowout as a "rapid loss of air".  Basically to sell tires, BOTH manufacturers had to sacrifice safety for speed or tire sales.

 

I know some of you might be thinking "these are taxi cabs, were talking about real race cars here".  But these are still the issues I see that will correlate to sprint car racing.  I assume it's very expensive to develop a sprint car tire.  I think you would still have to mandate that all tire manufacturers bring enough tires for all the cars (just look at all the conspiracy theorists over certain drivers getting longer in the work area, imagine if only Brad Sweet was allowed to run American Racer tires on championship night and won by 1/2 lap?).  And then you get into the competition side of things.  two things the manufacturers are going to do to sell tires is by speed and price, which is great usually, unfortunately with racing tires both of those are going to sacrifice safety.



SVMike
November 02, 2023 at 01:37:17 AM
Joined: 12/03/2004
Posts: 441
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Murphy on November 01 2023 at 09:04:14 PM

I've started reading Strowser's posts in the voice of Pee Wee Herman. They're easier to put into context that way. Smile



Perfect!



jason88cubs
November 03, 2023 at 06:00:49 AM
Joined: 10/19/2023
Posts: 69
Reply

https://sportsnaut.com/world-of-outlaws-or-high-limit-a-national-sprint-car-split-has-arrived/

 

 

No way this doesn't end badly




Stock car guy
November 06, 2023 at 10:15:21 AM
Joined: 10/24/2023
Posts: 2
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: hardon on November 02 2023 at 12:32:03 AM

Murphy, I almost always believe that a "free market" aproach means that everyone wins.  Since businesses need to be competetive with each other, typically better products with better prices will come out.  The one (or the only one I can think of right now) exception is racing tires.  This youtube video is a very interesting watch as to why it doesn't work https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eu5b8oYwiQM .  If you don't want to watch it, I'll try to remember the main bullet points.  Goodyear was purchased by some company and NASCAR was concerned that this company might not want to make racing tires anymore.  They asked Hoosier to get involved.  They allowed both Goodyear and Hoosier to provide tires at every race, I think the years were 88-89 and then again in 94.  But the one rule they had was BOTH manufacturers had to bring enough tires to every race for EVERYONE.  It was not just the people who had contracts to run their tires, EVERYONE.  As I'm sure everyone can see, this is a huge expense to bring semi truck loads of tires that might not get used at all.  Not sure how much they got into it but the "competition" started coming out, and both Goodyear and Hoosier were trying to make faster tires.  We all know what a faster tire means.  The thing I still remember about this video that I think is hilarious is niether Goodyear or Hoosier would call their blowouts "blowouts", they would refer to a blowout as a "rapid loss of air".  Basically to sell tires, BOTH manufacturers had to sacrifice safety for speed or tire sales.

 

I know some of you might be thinking "these are taxi cabs, were talking about real race cars here".  But these are still the issues I see that will correlate to sprint car racing.  I assume it's very expensive to develop a sprint car tire.  I think you would still have to mandate that all tire manufacturers bring enough tires for all the cars (just look at all the conspiracy theorists over certain drivers getting longer in the work area, imagine if only Brad Sweet was allowed to run American Racer tires on championship night and won by 1/2 lap?).  And then you get into the competition side of things.  two things the manufacturers are going to do to sell tires is by speed and price, which is great usually, unfortunately with racing tires both of those are going to sacrifice safety.



As a guy who worked on Cup cars from 1974-2013 the worst thing that ever happened was the Hoosier versus Goodyear deal. Not blaming anyone but racers are going to race and people got hurt. In addition, some of the contracted teams got tires with the prescribed numbers on them for the track they were used at but they were always faster than the tires you got from the dealer at the track. 





Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2025 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy