HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: Larson entered in Knoxville Nationals Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 3 of 4   of  65 replies
djscotty14
MyWebsite
June 27, 2017 at 11:55:37 AM
Joined: 09/06/2005
Posts: 47
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: NWFAN on June 27 2017 at 09:19:22 AM

from a  very reliable source I have been told that if he has a nasnap race that weekend he cannot contractually compete, but the sprint card gods may be with him ..........and US!



Yes this is why he will only run the prelim night, this is also why he did not race in Calistoga last weekend.  I think he cant race a sprint car the night before a cup race actually 



blazer00
June 27, 2017 at 12:40:02 PM
Joined: 06/10/2015
Posts: 2420
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: vande77 on June 27 2017 at 10:43:50 AM

As I recall all those drivers quit a ride during the Nationals and some raced another car on Saturday night other than the one they qualified.  Sammy quit Laverne Nance FedEx ride and went home (and if I remember right, the car was in the first couple rows on Saturday),  Rico had a truck race, Wolfgang ran someone else's car and not the car he qualified,  Jeff Swindell quit his ride mid-week and ran another car as I recall on Saturday, Tyler Walker just up and left town Friday night or Saturday morning and was a no-show and the car didn't run because they driver was gone. 

Most of these guys had a "handshake" deal to run the cars they were in.  They could have been fired mid-event or the team could fold (Kerry Madsen lost his ride the day after the Nationals last year) without notice.  

What about those teams that are in the C-main that pack up every year and head back home?  Should they be banned for 10 years too?  By the logic used above they should.  They were qualified for the C-main of the Nationals but choose not to run.

I for one think if a guy can only compete on Saturday they should let them compete as well.  Only thing is they have 0 points so they have to start last in the E-main and see if they can advance through the alphabet.

The RULES have stated for as long as I can remember that the "car" qualifies for the race, not the driver.  If Larson puts the 57 in the feature they can tab another driver to run it Saturday night (maybe a guy with horrible luck during the event or a guy that is currently without a ride) but they have to start last in the race they qualified for.

Unless the other competiors have an issue with him competing just his prelim night, I have no idea why anyone else would.



I'm not sure that you aren't reaching a bit, and that your idea of "logic" is way off.......we're not talking about guys qualified for the "C"  going home....and in those instances, they fill the vacant spot by moving qualfied drivers forward in the line up, and taking three drivers or whatever it takes from the "D", rather than two to fill the "C". That has happened many times. This isn't one of those instances. What we are talking about is a guy who says up front in so many words, "I'll run a preliminary night, but not Saturday night because I have a prior commitment." To me that's a selfish act! Either commit to the Nationals or stay home! I don't care who he is. He can be in the parade if he wants to be part of the Nationals. If the owner of the car wants to run the Nationals, then hire a driver that plans on running the entire event.

Some of what you say omits that a couple guys you mention came back through the non qualifiers night to make the show on Saturday in a different car. I still don't recall Wolfgang doing what you state (not stating for fact he didn't, but I sure don't think he did).  I do recall Steve Kinser trashing Karl's car on his qualifying night....and they hooked up with Trostle who had lost his engine, and by using Karl's engine and Steve as driver, the Trostle #20 car won the Nationals. I believe that was 1980. Rules have changed since then. Steve did not start dead last in that A Main.

It is just a matter of opinion at this point in time, I know that.  Some fans say no big deal, and others don't think it right. As long as the rules allow it, it's right. Smile  And there is nothing wrong with how anybody feels about the subject. So don't take what I posted personally.



saphead
June 27, 2017 at 01:42:44 PM
Joined: 11/30/2004
Posts: 1288
Reply

If Kyle wants so badly to drive upon the sacred black Iowa clay in spite of the looming 10 year ban, I would respect that. After his suspension expires in the year 2027, he would be relatively young at 35, and still have plenty of chances to win the Nationals. 

 

 

 

 

 




Shortie12
MyWebsite
June 27, 2017 at 02:03:03 PM
Joined: 12/11/2008
Posts: 837
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: saphead on June 27 2017 at 01:42:44 PM

If Kyle wants so badly to drive upon the sacred black Iowa clay in spite of the looming 10 year ban, I would respect that. After his suspension expires in the year 2027, he would be relatively young at 35, and still have plenty of chances to win the Nationals. 

 

 

 

 

 



Having Larson,Rico,and Stewart all racing the Nationals is huge.It wont happen but how many extra fans would turn out at a weekly show to see these guys.The money is not an issue as the start and park guys in Nascar make more than if they won an WOO show.Any PR is good and Larson to me is one of the biggest draws in Nascar.Chip wants him to win the Nascar  championship and many owners would not let him race other venues so we are lucky as He is becoming one of the best and his attitude is refreshing compared to many Nascar drivers.



vande77
June 27, 2017 at 02:26:14 PM
Joined: 01/20/2005
Posts: 2079
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: blazer00 on June 27 2017 at 12:40:02 PM

I'm not sure that you aren't reaching a bit, and that your idea of "logic" is way off.......we're not talking about guys qualified for the "C"  going home....and in those instances, they fill the vacant spot by moving qualfied drivers forward in the line up, and taking three drivers or whatever it takes from the "D", rather than two to fill the "C". That has happened many times. This isn't one of those instances. What we are talking about is a guy who says up front in so many words, "I'll run a preliminary night, but not Saturday night because I have a prior commitment." To me that's a selfish act! Either commit to the Nationals or stay home! I don't care who he is. He can be in the parade if he wants to be part of the Nationals. If the owner of the car wants to run the Nationals, then hire a driver that plans on running the entire event.

Some of what you say omits that a couple guys you mention came back through the non qualifiers night to make the show on Saturday in a different car. I still don't recall Wolfgang doing what you state (not stating for fact he didn't, but I sure don't think he did).  I do recall Steve Kinser trashing Karl's car on his qualifying night....and they hooked up with Trostle who had lost his engine, and by using Karl's engine and Steve as driver, the Trostle #20 car won the Nationals. I believe that was 1980. Rules have changed since then. Steve did not start dead last in that A Main.

It is just a matter of opinion at this point in time, I know that.  Some fans say no big deal, and others don't think it right. As long as the rules allow it, it's right. Smile  And there is nothing wrong with how anybody feels about the subject. So don't take what I posted personally.



If Kyle and the 57 go home, someone will move up in their place just like they do in the C and D main every year.  Same logic applies to this situation.

If Paul would put someone in the car, no one will move up, tehy will serve the penalty and have to start last instead.  Same goes for everyone else entered in the Nationals.  They can make a driver change, the penalty is starting last in the feature they qualified for.

It's not like they are making a special rule just for him.  Remember the "non-starting provisional" that Ted Johnson came up with when Andy Hillenberg didn't make the feature one year?  Even Hillenberg wanted nothing to do with that and said so himself.

When Steve won in 1980 you could "Give up" your qualifying night and qualify again the next night.  Steve "gave up" his Wednesday night (as did Trostle) and they put the team together and came back Thursday night in the 20X and were 4th fast, won the heat, and ran 2nd to Sammy in the feature.  Steve accumlated enough points in the Trostle 20x to start on the outside of the front row.  Sammy Swindell accumlated enough points to start 3rd for 4th and quit the FedEx car and had a DNS (they only started 22 cars back in thoe days and Joe Saldana finished 22nd, so someone backfilled his spot when they didn't race).   Car counts were not near what they are now, they only had 3 feature on Saturday (Sunday) that year.

Mike Brooks led the first 13 laps (on Sunday afternoon) as that was the "fog out" on Saturday night that year as well. 



Eagle Pit Shack Guy
MyWebsite
June 27, 2017 at 02:45:02 PM
Joined: 02/11/2005
Posts: 1457
Reply

Is it just me or are there a great deal of people with naturally occurring granular material composed of finely divided rock and mineral particles in their hindmost fissure??


I am lucky enough to work at one of the best tracks 
anywhere.


Nickules
June 27, 2017 at 02:51:59 PM
Joined: 08/05/2015
Posts: 1133
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Eagle Pit Shack Guy on June 27 2017 at 02:45:02 PM

Is it just me or are there a great deal of people with naturally occurring granular material composed of finely divided rock and mineral particles in their hindmost fissure??



HaHa you don't come here for the "rational" takes do you Smile



blazer00
June 27, 2017 at 03:01:59 PM
Joined: 06/10/2015
Posts: 2420
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: vande77 on June 27 2017 at 02:26:14 PM

If Kyle and the 57 go home, someone will move up in their place just like they do in the C and D main every year.  Same logic applies to this situation.

If Paul would put someone in the car, no one will move up, tehy will serve the penalty and have to start last instead.  Same goes for everyone else entered in the Nationals.  They can make a driver change, the penalty is starting last in the feature they qualified for.

It's not like they are making a special rule just for him.  Remember the "non-starting provisional" that Ted Johnson came up with when Andy Hillenberg didn't make the feature one year?  Even Hillenberg wanted nothing to do with that and said so himself.

When Steve won in 1980 you could "Give up" your qualifying night and qualify again the next night.  Steve "gave up" his Wednesday night (as did Trostle) and they put the team together and came back Thursday night in the 20X and were 4th fast, won the heat, and ran 2nd to Sammy in the feature.  Steve accumlated enough points in the Trostle 20x to start on the outside of the front row.  Sammy Swindell accumlated enough points to start 3rd for 4th and quit the FedEx car and had a DNS (they only started 22 cars back in thoe days and Joe Saldana finished 22nd, so someone backfilled his spot when they didn't race).   Car counts were not near what they are now, they only had 3 feature on Saturday (Sunday) that year.

Mike Brooks led the first 13 laps (on Sunday afternoon) as that was the "fog out" on Saturday night that year as well. 



You're right....no arguement IF Larson and the 57 go home.....but that isn't likely the case, is it?  The car will most likely stay, while Larson leaves. And that is the plan, which is what is being discussed, not all the other scenerios you bring up. And yes, I understand that is playing by the rules. I know all about the 1980 deal with the Kinsers and Trostle and why they were able to do that.  That isn't allowed any more. You either make it on your qualifying night, or you run the non qualifiers on Friday night as you know. What Ted Johnson did when the Nationals was sanctioned by the WoO doesn't matter today. It's no longer a WoO sanctioned event. Not sure how many years back you are refering to on car counts, I think the largest car count was in the late '80's early '90's with right at 160 entrants. Except for the earlier years, car counts have been pretty stable. 110-130 pretty common as I recall for the past 30-35 years or so. I'm not so sure that car counts haven't dipped some in the past 10 years.



Eagle Pit Shack Guy
MyWebsite
June 27, 2017 at 03:13:45 PM
Joined: 02/11/2005
Posts: 1457
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Nickules on June 27 2017 at 02:51:59 PM

HaHa you don't come here for the "rational" takes do you Smile



I hope that wasn't a serious question on your part. Smile

Really though; why are so many so upset over something that hasn't even happened yet???


I am lucky enough to work at one of the best tracks 
anywhere.


GTigers55
June 27, 2017 at 03:19:23 PM
Joined: 02/13/2017
Posts: 420
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Eagle Pit Shack Guy on June 27 2017 at 03:13:45 PM

I hope that wasn't a serious question on your part. Smile

Really though; why are so many so upset over something that hasn't even happened yet???



+1. Was surprised when I checked in today and this thread had 40+ comments. The tangents on here amaze me lol



HoldenCaulfield
June 27, 2017 at 03:44:32 PM
Joined: 03/22/2008
Posts: 2509
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: saphead on June 26 2017 at 09:31:20 PM

If you quaify for the Knoxville Nationals Championship final and skip it due to another commitment involving any other racing series you should be banned from racing at Knoxville Raceway or any WoO event for not less than 10 years. 



LOL, No they should just add another car from the B.


A

HoldenCaulfield
June 27, 2017 at 03:56:18 PM
Joined: 03/22/2008
Posts: 2509
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: blazer00 on June 27 2017 at 08:38:01 AM

That it's "awesome" or "great' for those fans that simply want to see Larson compete, even though he says he won't be back for Saturday night, and that means it's "acceptable" to them that another driver might lose a spot in the A Main. And yes, my primary gripe is with Knoxville for allowing it to take place. What would they do if there were say.....4 or 5 drivers with that plan?  Just because right now there is only Larson in the picture doesn't make it "acceptable"......for fans and teams in general.  



Agreed, nothing wrong with a driver running a preliminary night even if they can't be back Saturday but allowing the team to do a start and park with a substitute driver is complete bullshit. That driver didn't qualify for the A. The guy who ran it on Wed or Thur did.


A


vkracer51
June 27, 2017 at 04:25:21 PM
Joined: 09/17/2012
Posts: 63
Reply

Blazer00

The car counts are posted on the site. You have to remember it wasn't uncommon for a lot of guys to leave town on Saturday when they didn't make the show in the 80s and early 90s. As someone that has been in a situation at a track where a guy qualified for a race and left for someone else to drive. That's part of the game unfortunately. It's nice they penalize the car because many races across the country doesn't. That just adds salt to the wound. Do i agree with them putting someone else in? No but i also believe that if i or my car (retired from driving don't have to worry about this) makes a race with someone else in the car just to qualify it would take a little away if that was my only reasoning. But i also believe it's a reward to the guys that work their butts off to put that car in the show. The crew guys deserve that. Thats why when it was a crew guy that got into Rico's car i didn't see an issue. That crew guy deserved that he earned that from all his hard work. I take issue if say an active 410 driver that didn't attempt to qualify the car jumps in.

1961…59
1962…75
1963…78
1964…87
1965…102
1966…97
1967…92
1968…77
1969…77
1970…105
1971…96
1972…109
1973…98
1974…95
1975…113
1976…90
1977…124
1978…129
1979…108
1980…90
1981…86
1982…92
1983…106
1984…104
1985…101
1986…104
1987…126
1988…111
1989…125
1990…134
1991…166
1992…158
1993…149
1994…132
1995…145
1996…153
1997…154
1998…140
1999…130
2000…128
2001…126
2002…116
2003…114
2004…119
2005…118
2006…128
2007…105
2008…110
2009…107
2010…100
2011…99
2012…98
2013...102
2014...105
2015...112
2016... 107



Paintboss
MyWebsite
June 27, 2017 at 04:32:06 PM
Joined: 12/02/2004
Posts: 2215
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: BigRightRear on June 27 2017 at 11:21:08 AM

something tells me Schatz doesn't give a shit...




LOL.. Good one



blazer00
June 27, 2017 at 06:29:53 PM
Joined: 06/10/2015
Posts: 2420
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: vkracer51 on June 27 2017 at 04:25:21 PM

Blazer00

The car counts are posted on the site. You have to remember it wasn't uncommon for a lot of guys to leave town on Saturday when they didn't make the show in the 80s and early 90s. As someone that has been in a situation at a track where a guy qualified for a race and left for someone else to drive. That's part of the game unfortunately. It's nice they penalize the car because many races across the country doesn't. That just adds salt to the wound. Do i agree with them putting someone else in? No but i also believe that if i or my car (retired from driving don't have to worry about this) makes a race with someone else in the car just to qualify it would take a little away if that was my only reasoning. But i also believe it's a reward to the guys that work their butts off to put that car in the show. The crew guys deserve that. Thats why when it was a crew guy that got into Rico's car i didn't see an issue. That crew guy deserved that he earned that from all his hard work. I take issue if say an active 410 driver that didn't attempt to qualify the car jumps in.

1961…59
1962…75
1963…78
1964…87
1965…102
1966…97
1967…92
1968…77
1969…77
1970…105
1971…96
1972…109
1973…98
1974…95
1975…113
1976…90
1977…124
1978…129
1979…108
1980…90
1981…86
1982…92
1983…106
1984…104
1985…101
1986…104
1987…126
1988…111
1989…125
1990…134
1991…166
1992…158
1993…149
1994…132
1995…145
1996…153
1997…154
1998…140
1999…130
2000…128
2001…126
2002…116
2003…114
2004…119
2005…118
2006…128
2007…105
2008…110
2009…107
2010…100
2011…99
2012…98
2013...102
2014...105
2015...112
2016... 107



Thanks! I wasn't far off with my assessmant. I was going by memory, as I was there all the years since 1972. And it has fallen off the past 10 years in comparison to the previous 20 years.




cynbad
June 27, 2017 at 06:31:43 PM
Joined: 10/24/2008
Posts: 68
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Paintboss on June 27 2017 at 04:32:06 PM


LOL.. Good one



So, after all this jibber jabber.. neither Kyle, Rico or Kasey should have been allowed to run Ohio Speedweek; nor should they be allowed to run PA Speedweek as they won't be running the complete Series of races.  

Hmmm.. Nothing like cutting off your nose to spite your face..And we thought you all loved the sport! 



blazer00
June 27, 2017 at 06:34:52 PM
Joined: 06/10/2015
Posts: 2420
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: cynbad on June 27 2017 at 06:31:43 PM

So, after all this jibber jabber.. neither Kyle, Rico or Kasey should have been allowed to run Ohio Speedweek; nor should they be allowed to run PA Speedweek as they won't be running the complete Series of races.  

Hmmm.. Nothing like cutting off your nose to spite your face..And we thought you all loved the sport! 



Apples and oranges.....

 



Paintboss
MyWebsite
June 27, 2017 at 07:32:34 PM
Joined: 12/02/2004
Posts: 2215
Reply

It's still a free world last time I checked. You pay your entry fee and you should be able to race as much or as little as you like.

We as fans can buy a 4 night Nationals ticket package, go the first 3 nights then choose to stay home on the Championship night. Should we be banned from buying 4-day passes for the next 10 years?

I agree with you guys, I wish he would run the whole show but at least he does what he is allowed or able to do and I guarantee there is a hell of a lot more fans that that are happy to see him there for the time that he can commit than there are fans pissed off for the portion that he can not attend. Which is unfortunately the Championship night.

I like the kid and I'll be one of the guys happy to see him there whether it is 1,2 or all nights.  (Hopefully it is all nights)




Nickules
June 27, 2017 at 07:51:07 PM
Joined: 08/05/2015
Posts: 1133
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Eagle Pit Shack Guy on June 27 2017 at 03:13:45 PM

I hope that wasn't a serious question on your part. Smile

Really though; why are so many so upset over something that hasn't even happened yet???



I'm with ya. Not sure why so much butthurt...but let's not kid ourselves into thinking we didn't invision this exact thing happening on this thread. This is Hoseheads after all. Leave rationale and objectivity at the doorwink



blazer00
June 27, 2017 at 08:20:29 PM
Joined: 06/10/2015
Posts: 2420
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Paintboss on June 27 2017 at 07:32:34 PM

It's still a free world last time I checked. You pay your entry fee and you should be able to race as much or as little as you like.

We as fans can buy a 4 night Nationals ticket package, go the first 3 nights then choose to stay home on the Championship night. Should we be banned from buying 4-day passes for the next 10 years?

I agree with you guys, I wish he would run the whole show but at least he does what he is allowed or able to do and I guarantee there is a hell of a lot more fans that that are happy to see him there for the time that he can commit than there are fans pissed off for the portion that he can not attend. Which is unfortunately the Championship night.

I like the kid and I'll be one of the guys happy to see him there whether it is 1,2 or all nights.  (Hopefully it is all nights)



Really? A comparison to fans buying tickets? Too funny!





Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2025 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy