|
|
|
|
|
Topic: Camera Question...
|
Email this topic to a friend |
Subscribe to this Topic
| Report this Topic to Moderator
|
|
Page 1 of 1 of 6 replies
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2008 at
01:02:16 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
05/30/2007
|
|
Posts:
|
784
|
|
|
|
...one of our infamous "porch pilots" has made me doubt my choices for a new lens.
I use a Canon EOS 30D currently equipped with an EF 24 - 85mm lens. I want to add a lens to my bag, shoot tons of outdoor...daughter's volleyball, son's football, racing, fishing, hunting...
I was thinking telephoto, but now not so much.
Help!
"As long as I can have a fast boat, a margarita
machine and can light my hair on fire, I'll be just
fine."
Jason Giambi
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2008 at
01:27:30 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
10/30/2005
|
|
Posts:
|
1074
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: Faster Pussycat on January 25 2008 at 01:02:16 PM
...one of our infamous "porch pilots" has made me doubt my choices for a new lens.
I use a Canon EOS 30D currently equipped with an EF 24 - 85mm lens. I want to add a lens to my bag, shoot tons of outdoor...daughter's volleyball, son's football, racing, fishing, hunting...
I was thinking telephoto, but now not so much.
Help!
|
I have a 10D and have two lenses for it: 28-105 & 80-200. They are both Canon lenses and cover pretty much anything I could ever need. Back when I was at the racetrack every week I had fixed focal length lenses because I knew their quality was better and I knew what my subject was. Therefore I had a pair of Nikor 200's and a pair of Nikor 135's (still have them actually - too bad their worth a fraction of what I paid for them because they were the best lenses ever made). I think it is probably still true today that fixed focal length lenses are better quality but with today's technology and the fact that everything is auto-focus any way the versatility of a good telephoto lens is likely the way to go. JMO......
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2008 at
04:19:01 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
05/03/2005
|
|
Posts:
|
572
|
|
|
|
Just use fast glass (f2.8) or faster and you'll be fine
John could pop in here he is a cannon man
Brian
"TURN AROUND; MATE !"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2008 at
06:00:15 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
12/05/2004
|
|
Posts:
|
19
|
|
|
|
I use a 20D. Have a nice 1.8 50 mm which gives great shots in bad light (night at a dirt track). That lens was too wide for good static shots in the pits and often too short for the action shots. Since I've been a good boy Santa brought me a 70 to 200 L series which I used for the first time at the Chili Bowl. Its the 4.0 and not the 2.8 but who is gonna give Santa grief. It gave me the best action shots I have ever got down there.
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2008 at
06:00:45 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
11/07/2006
|
|
Posts:
|
1179
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: calendarguy on January 25 2008 at 01:27:30 PM
I have a 10D and have two lenses for it: 28-105 & 80-200. They are both Canon lenses and cover pretty much anything I could ever need. Back when I was at the racetrack every week I had fixed focal length lenses because I knew their quality was better and I knew what my subject was. Therefore I had a pair of Nikor 200's and a pair of Nikor 135's (still have them actually - too bad their worth a fraction of what I paid for them because they were the best lenses ever made). I think it is probably still true today that fixed focal length lenses are better quality but with today's technology and the fact that everything is auto-focus any way the versatility of a good telephoto lens is likely the way to go. JMO......
|
I just bought a Nikon 85mm f1.8 to add to my racing collection. It's the perfect focal length for the short tracks we have up here. Of course I've got longer lenses and a mono pod that come in handy when I decide to spend the night in the stands drinking beer. 
Stan Meissner (Check out the photo gallery and blog)
Website
www.gotomn.com
Photos
Blog
|
|
|
|
January 25, 2008 at
09:53:17 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
12/01/2004
|
|
Posts:
|
805
|
|
|
|
I use the canon 5D and now the 1d Mk III. Neither of my two primary lenses are fixed focal length. They are 24-70 f/2.8L and 70-200 f/2.8L IS. I rarely use them down to 2.8 though as the depth of field is not great enough for the length of a car. At 2.8 100mm full frame your depth of field is about 5.5'. That means either the tail tank or the front wing is not going to be in focus. Usually I am at about 4.0 and at really dark tracks 3.2. Top of the line flash with a quick recycle is much more important at night than anything else. I do have an 85mm f/1.8 but rarely use it anymore outside of portraits.
But then I am self taught so maybe not the best person to ask. Hey Chris, there are collectors out there looking for that stuff all the time. Try craigslist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2008 at
01:03:34 PM
|
|
|
Joined:
|
11/07/2006
|
|
Posts:
|
1179
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: Johns Racing Photos on January 25 2008 at 09:53:17 PM
I use the canon 5D and now the 1d Mk III. Neither of my two primary lenses are fixed focal length. They are 24-70 f/2.8L and 70-200 f/2.8L IS. I rarely use them down to 2.8 though as the depth of field is not great enough for the length of a car. At 2.8 100mm full frame your depth of field is about 5.5'. That means either the tail tank or the front wing is not going to be in focus. Usually I am at about 4.0 and at really dark tracks 3.2. Top of the line flash with a quick recycle is much more important at night than anything else. I do have an 85mm f/1.8 but rarely use it anymore outside of portraits.
But then I am self taught so maybe not the best person to ask. Hey Chris, there are collectors out there looking for that stuff all the time. Try craigslist.
|
Cameras like the D300 with their advances in noise reduction are going to make toting those heavy Norman strobes a thing of the past. I shoot with a Nikon hotshoe on a bracket with an external power supply. The only drawback about slower recycle times is shooting flip sequences but catching flips is hit and miss anyways. I've got a plate and screws in my neck so I don't care to carry all that weight for six hours. If someone flips I'll only catch one or two shots instead of six or eight, no big deal, if I want crash photos I'll go to a demo derby.
The 85mm f1.8 is a very popular lens for sharpness and focal length up here but you're right, you don't want to use it wide open. I specifically bought it for Late Models because that's what they use up here and that's what I shoot week in and week. I've got a 70-300 that I use until dark and have a 28-105 f2.8 as well but even with that I set it around 85mm most of the time.
Taking photos is kind of like racing in a way. Your setup is going to vary from track to track according to lighting, color of dirt and how close you can safely shoot from. I enjoy the challenge of trying to get that perfect shot and always feel like I can do just a little better during the coming season. Racers feel that way too, "just wait until next year!" 
Stan Meissner (Check out the photo gallery and blog)
Website
www.gotomn.com
Photos
Blog
|
|
|