|
|
Topic: Video of Controversial WoO Sprints Race Posted
|
Email this topic to a friend |
Subscribe to this Topic
| Report this Topic to Moderator
|
Page 2 of 4 of 79 replies
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
09:43:54 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
05/26/2009
|
Posts:
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
09:50:12 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
04/04/2008
|
Posts:
|
389
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: The_Truth_Detector on March 22 2015 at 09:38:14 AM
When transponders were first introduced, all tracks that I know of used human scorekeepers too, I know that Knoxville still does. Are the World of Outlaws depending 100% on the transponders for accuracy?
|
Wow. That was pretty cut and dried and if this race was at Petaluma, Stewart would have been declared the winner. At the Promoters Workshop in Reno, during AMB's own seminar, one of the first things they say is the human element should always overrule the transponder element when it comes to close finishes and they state a few factors already brought up in this thread. There was already precedence set at a track where transponders were overruled when Swanson beat Clauson at a USAC race. The loop was 15-20 feet past the finish line and Clauson had a huge run but didn't get there before the flagstand, but did at the loop. Swanson was declared winner over the transponder scoring. Difference at loop was .008.
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
09:55:58 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
05/26/2009
|
Posts:
|
38
|
|
|
Also Shane leads at white flag and runs a 15.719 to Shatz's 15.682 on the last lap, how does that add up to .22? Wasn't there a famous NASCAR race years ago that the outcome was changed days later and gave Lee Petty the victory? That race is still one of the most important races in their history, why, because in the end they got the call right. I don't expect the WoO will do the same but if they did they would gain a lot of credibility with its fans who give them all a paycheck.
|
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
10:03:35 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
06/09/2005
|
Posts:
|
106
|
|
|
Looks like the video is taken before the flagstand which would give us a decieving angle. I would count on the transponders more than a video shot on an angle.
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
10:11:57 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
09/02/2013
|
Posts:
|
82
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: darbo42 on March 22 2015 at 09:02:54 AM
Most transponders are placed in the back of the car, not the front. At that speed it could be a difference between the front nose and the point at which the the transponders pass over the line. I guess to be absolutely correct the transponders should be at the very front of the nose but that would eliminate quite a few transponders thoughout the night.
|
Both ASCS National Tour and WoO both place them at the RF corner. In the Picture you can just see the red transponder.
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
10:16:07 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
05/26/2009
|
Posts:
|
38
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: OutlawDan on March 22 2015 at 10:03:35 AM
Looks like the video is taken before the flagstand which would give us a decieving angle. I would count on the transponders more than a video shot on an angle.
|
Either way, Shane's leading coming off of 4 and leading going into 1, how does Shatz get 2 full car lengths ahead in straightaway regardless of where video is filmed from. If that's all the better transponders can do I would trust them much less than any other way to decide a race.
|
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
10:16:23 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
11/02/2013
|
Posts:
|
529
|
|
|
This message was edited on
March 22, 2015 at
10:22:34 AM by kossuth
Reply to:
Posted By: OutlawDan on March 22 2015 at 10:03:35 AM
Looks like the video is taken before the flagstand which would give us a decieving angle. I would count on the transponders more than a video shot on an angle.
|
Watch the video again. While there isn't a dedicated flag stand I am under the impression that the Genie Lift in the infield where the flagger is running the race from is representative of where the start finish line. This is more of a case of where the more and more I watch the replay the more and more convinced I am of a transponder error. Slow the video down and watch it. There has also been another incident (with Indycars) where a similar problem occurred a number of years ago and improper installation can cause this.
http://autoweek.com/article/car-news/upside-down-error-indycar
And also another instance where it screwed up the timing and scoring for a restart in a Nascar race.
http://www.therecord.com/sports-story/2606148-edwards-and-stewart-mistakes-make-for-nascar-drama/
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
10:57:01 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
11/27/2004
|
Posts:
|
3751
|
|
|
Perhaps somone pressed the time trial voodoo button on the timing system on the last lap of the race rather than the last lap of Donny's TT?
meanwhile...Brian Paulus' track record at Williams Grove still stands.
Lincoln 1845 ft/.35 mile T1=118MPH
Eldora 2287 ft/.43mile T3=135MPH
Port 2716 ft/.51 mile T3=TBD
Grove 2792 ft/.53 mile T3=135MPH
Selinsgrove 2847 ft/.54 mile T1=136MPH
"I didn't move to PA from El Paso in search of better
weather." Van May
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
11:41:22 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
10/26/2014
|
Posts:
|
2482
|
|
|
My observations are as follows:
1. By looking at the video, it sure appeared as if Stewart won
2. Shane Stewart may be a contender for the WoO title this year. That team has come out strong at as of right now, it looks as if they're going to be right there with the 9 and the 15 all season long.
3. So much for the WoO struggling without Steve and Sammy.
4. Stockton looks like and extremely racey joint. Wish it was a little closer to Pennsylvania
|
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
11:58:17 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
01/13/2009
|
Posts:
|
1699
|
|
|
From the camera angle i saw too looked like Shane
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
11:59:33 AM
|
|
Joined:
|
01/13/2009
|
Posts:
|
1699
|
|
|
I Too thought Shane Stewart won when i looked at video
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
12:08:07 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
02/11/2005
|
Posts:
|
16
|
|
|
The margin of victory is the dead give away that something is wrong. Two tenths of a second at those speeds is not a photo finish. You could spin the camera angle and scoring loop location story if the gap was extremely narrow, but anybody that races knows .2 seconds is more than what we all saw.
Transponders have been known to spit out some goofy numbers at times. I don't think you can blindly rely on them in a circumstance like this. There needs to be an element of common sense involved.
|
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
12:16:15 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
09/14/2010
|
Posts:
|
7603
|
|
|
This message was edited on
March 22, 2015 at
03:10:30 PM by revjimk
It looked like Stewart won to me....
But I agree he could give Schatz a run for his money this year, especially at Knoxville where's he's dominated 360s & been a hard charger in 410s. He seems to be getting used to 410 racing
Wish I could have been there....
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
12:27:40 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
11/30/2004
|
Posts:
|
1461
|
|
|
Throwing out any video evidence and relying completely on the transponder data....there has to be a glitch in the software. I am convinced that the problem was NOT caused by the location of the transponder within each car or the location of the wire loop on the track.
Plain and simple.....the 2 tripped the wire first on the white flag lap, ran a 15.719, the 15 crossed the wires second and ran a 15.682 That means that the margin of victory should have been .037 or less.
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
12:42:50 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
11/18/2009
|
Posts:
|
149
|
|
|
Sprintcarstats.com has another angle that shows Schatz as the clear winner. But it's from a different angle. Based on that video I would say the transponder was correct and Donny won.
|
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
01:01:28 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
07/26/2010
|
Posts:
|
164
|
|
|
Looked at the finish and have a couple issues.
Where is the finish line ?
The Outlaws are saying Schatz won by inches on the main page of their website, and in the artical saying won by .220 sec. Im not a racer of a math guy but I would think .220 sec at 100 mph is not inches? I would think it would be feet (est 5 to 10 ft).
Need a video camera on the line of the start/finish line not only on the inside but on the outside looking down the line.
I hope that there is a way for and the series to look at this and make a final call even after the fact.
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
01:01:34 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
11/02/2013
|
Posts:
|
529
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: Skidooxp19 on March 22 2015 at 12:42:50 PM
Sprintcarstats.com has another angle that shows Schatz as the clear winner. But it's from a different angle. Based on that video I would say the transponder was correct and Donny won.
|
Please post a link to that video. I went to their website and the latest stuff I'm seeing is blog postings from the end of February
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
01:01:39 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
05/26/2009
|
Posts:
|
38
|
|
|
Reply to:
Posted By: Skidooxp19 on March 22 2015 at 12:42:50 PM
Sprintcarstats.com has another angle that shows Schatz as the clear winner. But it's from a different angle. Based on that video I would say the transponder was correct and Donny won.
|
Haven't seen the video skidoo, does it show him winning by 25 feet(2 full car lengths)?
|
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
01:25:38 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
07/22/2008
|
Posts:
|
809
|
|
|
Shane says on Twitter he got beat fair and square...
This vid seems to show that too, but the Stewart lovers and Shatz haters will of course disagree.
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=807593422611860
|
|
|
March 22, 2015 at
01:38:22 PM
|
|
Joined:
|
05/07/2013
|
Posts:
|
51
|
|
|
Here's my video from last night, different angle. https://youtu.be/JEYaS5NJ4kk
|
|