HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: Under pressure Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 2 of 4   of  70 replies
Schreurs12
November 29, 2017 at 07:40:45 AM
Joined: 04/11/2017
Posts: 35
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Murphy on November 29 2017 at 07:08:11 AM

     How does that compression compare to say, a common 360 sprint car engine?



A common 360 engine would have roughly 14:1.



DC
November 29, 2017 at 08:53:45 AM
Joined: 12/03/2004
Posts: 47
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Dryslick Willie on November 28 2017 at 05:42:18 PM

Very interesting.   With 12.5:1 is higher octane required or does the computer somehow control the timing advance to deal with the potential for pre-ignition?   



Direct Injection plays a huge role in the ability to run higher compression without the need to run premium fuel.



highspeeddirt
November 29, 2017 at 09:36:22 AM
Joined: 01/06/2009
Posts: 399
Reply

What RPM range are most guys running? I would think that would have a huge impact on engine life.




champphotos
MyWebsite
November 29, 2017 at 10:40:43 AM
Joined: 05/21/2011
Posts: 188
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: highspeeddirt on November 29 2017 at 09:36:22 AM

What RPM range are most guys running? I would think that would have a huge impact on engine life.



Well, we hardly ever turn either 360 or 410 over 8400. The driver/owner seems to have a rev limiter around 8200, I don't care what gear you put in the car.

DA



DC
November 29, 2017 at 12:34:22 PM
Joined: 12/03/2004
Posts: 47
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: highspeeddirt on November 29 2017 at 09:36:22 AM

What RPM range are most guys running? I would think that would have a huge impact on engine life.



We used to turn 8700-8800 in our 358 when we ran them and also our 360 when we moved to them.



larsonfan
November 29, 2017 at 12:49:49 PM
Joined: 03/24/2013
Posts: 1448
Reply

What does the ratio represent? (14:1, etc.)

How is it measured?




larsonfan
November 29, 2017 at 12:51:42 PM
Joined: 03/24/2013
Posts: 1448
Reply

Also, do the high comressions result in the need for methanol, vs alcohol or some other racing fuel? Or is that unrelated?

Thanks!



RodinCanada
MyWebsite
November 29, 2017 at 01:11:23 PM
Joined: 07/24/2016
Posts: 1722
Reply

14:1 means the volume of the combustion chamber is 14 times larger when the piston is at bottom dead center compared to when it is at top dead center.

Essentially you are squishing 14 units of air into the space of 1 unit of air.


Even though I may not know you, I 
care what most of you think!

RodinCanada
MyWebsite
November 29, 2017 at 01:13:30 PM
Joined: 07/24/2016
Posts: 1722
Reply
With that in mind... Do they ever have trouble push starting cars on a very wet track considering the light weight if the car, large tire ans slippery surface? Not enough traction to spin over a motor?
Even though I may not know you, I 
care what most of you think!


Wesmar
November 29, 2017 at 01:21:47 PM
Joined: 09/29/2005
Posts: 626
Reply

It's a monkey see monkey do atmosphere.  Champ is right, most guys tuen their engines (360) around 8,200-8,400 rpm's.  Your better funded teams where they don't care will buzz them up to 8,800-9,000.  Their theory is that running a deeper gear will pull them off the coener better.  The thing is on the dyno the majority of the engines quit making power around 7,800 rpm's.

Yes highspeed the higher rpm's do shorten the engine life dramatically!!  Used to be when they turned 7,800 max you could usually just do a minimum hone, zyglo the pistons and if they checked out ok which they usually did you could re-use them over.  With the rpm's they turn now the pistons are wore out and you have to put new pistons in every rebuild ($1,100-$1,200).

All the engine builders met with the WoO officials during the Nationals about 5-6 years ago to discuss various topics and ideas.  One engine builder suggested and RPM rule to which he was laughed at.  There were some engine builders that were like "this is the WoO and it should be run whatcha brung and hope you brought enough."  Now that a few years have passed I agree with the engine builder that wanted an RPM rule as I feel it would save teams some money.  Just the way it is now.



budz76
MyWebsite
November 29, 2017 at 01:24:16 PM
Joined: 12/03/2005
Posts: 281
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Schreurs12 on November 28 2017 at 02:54:38 PM

Its actually amazing what new cars are starting to squeeze out for compression. For example, a 2017 Chevy Malibu with a 1.8L 4 cylinder is squeezing 12.5:1 compression. 20 years ago that was a full blown race engine. Now its just an every day car. 



And that 12.5-1 is with today’s crappy gas but the computer compensates.



Jake B.
November 29, 2017 at 01:42:32 PM
Joined: 10/21/2005
Posts: 526
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: larsonfan on November 29 2017 at 12:51:42 PM

Also, do the high comressions result in the need for methanol, vs alcohol or some other racing fuel? Or is that unrelated?

Thanks!



Methanol is a form of alcohol.  I can't speak to the advantages of one form of fuel vs. another when it comes to compression, but I do know that methanol allows an engine to operate at a cooler internal temperature.


Signature here.


DC
November 29, 2017 at 02:14:12 PM
Joined: 12/03/2004
Posts: 47
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: budz76 on November 29 2017 at 01:24:16 PM

And that 12.5-1 is with today’s crappy gas but the computer compensates.



It's also been in large part the advent of gasoline direct injection.



Schreurs12
November 29, 2017 at 02:53:57 PM
Joined: 04/11/2017
Posts: 35
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: DC on November 29 2017 at 02:14:12 PM

It's also been in large part the advent of gasoline direct injection.



The direct injection is a major reason the compression can be bumped up so high in recent years. Seeing all the things coming out in modern vehicles makes it that much more obvious how far behind our local racing engines are. P.S. Im not trying to sound like minthess lol



revjimk
November 29, 2017 at 06:09:45 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7607
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: larsonfan on November 29 2017 at 12:51:42 PM

Also, do the high comressions result in the need for methanol, vs alcohol or some other racing fuel? Or is that unrelated?

Thanks!



You can use much higher compression with methanol than with gasoline. 

With gas, higher compression calls for higher octane




revjimk
November 29, 2017 at 06:17:19 PM
Joined: 09/14/2010
Posts: 7607
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Schreurs12 on November 29 2017 at 02:53:57 PM

The direct injection is a major reason the compression can be bumped up so high in recent years. Seeing all the things coming out in modern vehicles makes it that much more obvious how far behind our local racing engines are. P.S. Im not trying to sound like minthess lol



Am I correct in suspecting that lots of the old school mechanics don't want to learn about all the electronic stuff? I know I don't (not that I'm anything but a half ass wannabe mechanic)

Used to work on my Econoline, nowadays try to change air cleaner on my Focus... used to be one wingnut & replace paper element, now its some gizmo with warning to let the pros do it. Same with fuel filter: old days, 2 screws, replace the little "can". Now its hidden in the tank somewhere

I'm a curmudgeon....



zeakemedia
MyWebsite
November 29, 2017 at 06:30:38 PM
Joined: 01/27/2006
Posts: 110
Reply

If I am correct the higher compression also requires a larger camshaft. It's not just one thing. Once you start cranking one thing up the others  have to go up as well. I'd like to know the compression of a midget engine. I wasn't told a few years ago by a car owner he didn't run his engines more than six nights period. 

Blake



hardon
November 30, 2017 at 12:03:21 AM
Joined: 02/20/2005
Posts: 486
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Wesmar on November 29 2017 at 01:21:47 PM

It's a monkey see monkey do atmosphere.  Champ is right, most guys tuen their engines (360) around 8,200-8,400 rpm's.  Your better funded teams where they don't care will buzz them up to 8,800-9,000.  Their theory is that running a deeper gear will pull them off the coener better.  The thing is on the dyno the majority of the engines quit making power around 7,800 rpm's.

Yes highspeed the higher rpm's do shorten the engine life dramatically!!  Used to be when they turned 7,800 max you could usually just do a minimum hone, zyglo the pistons and if they checked out ok which they usually did you could re-use them over.  With the rpm's they turn now the pistons are wore out and you have to put new pistons in every rebuild ($1,100-$1,200).

All the engine builders met with the WoO officials during the Nationals about 5-6 years ago to discuss various topics and ideas.  One engine builder suggested and RPM rule to which he was laughed at.  There were some engine builders that were like "this is the WoO and it should be run whatcha brung and hope you brought enough."  Now that a few years have passed I agree with the engine builder that wanted an RPM rule as I feel it would save teams some money.  Just the way it is now.



I've said for years that a gear rule would dramatically help to reduce costs and help the underfunded teams compete.  I've heard all the arguments.  Yes I know that the higher funded teams will still get more horsepower out of their engines at lower RPMs.  But if teams don't have to spend money on freshening their motors every 5-6 races couldn't they buy more high performance parts?  A driver told me that lower RPMs would make the cars boring to drive.  I asked him how fun it would be to only race against 2 or 3 other cars versus a full field to which he didn't answer my question.  I guess I think the outlaws shouldn't turn anymore than 7,000 RPMs max and 360s or below should be around 6,000 RPMs.

My question is how much of a current sprint car engine could be used in another form of racing?  I think the LS engine makes sense but it could potentially bankrupt some teams if their entire engine inventory is obselete with them not being able to get much out of old engines.




bm154
November 30, 2017 at 12:18:47 AM
Joined: 11/30/2017
Posts: 1
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: RodinCanada on November 29 2017 at 01:13:30 PM
With that in mind... Do they ever have trouble push starting cars on a very wet track considering the light weight if the car, large tire ans slippery surface? Not enough traction to spin over a motor?


The short answer is yes. This past summer at Eldora for the Jokers Wild, Night Before, and Kings Royal (I can't recall exactly which night) the night it was rain delayed, some cars struggled to get the tires to roll on the wet pavement on the push start stetch on the infield.

I usually look to see what car has trouble getting the tires rolling when the push them out just out of curiousities sake. I beleive it was Clyde Knipp who started to slide sideways and actually swiped a few fans. (I don't know all the details exactly) I was 10 or so pits down from where it happened but the top wing smacked a few unsuspecting fans and split one wide open. They halted the show for a few minutes while they took care of everyone. 

It's a scary thought, really. The push trucks are just focused on getting the cars out and started and they push like hell. 



Schreurs12
November 30, 2017 at 07:42:48 AM
Joined: 04/11/2017
Posts: 35
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: revjimk on November 29 2017 at 06:17:19 PM

Am I correct in suspecting that lots of the old school mechanics don't want to learn about all the electronic stuff? I know I don't (not that I'm anything but a half ass wannabe mechanic)

Used to work on my Econoline, nowadays try to change air cleaner on my Focus... used to be one wingnut & replace paper element, now its some gizmo with warning to let the pros do it. Same with fuel filter: old days, 2 screws, replace the little "can". Now its hidden in the tank somewhere

I'm a curmudgeon....



Yeah Im sure that plays a role. Most of it is that we are creatures of habit. If what we have works right now, then why try to change it? No one like change, especially into the unknown. These LS engines such as the 5.3s are easier than the old engines to work on. There are millions of them around in junkyards all over the country, they are cheap to work on and build, and they are 10x as durable as the sbc equivalent. You can take a stock 5.3 and add a cam and carb set up (which most already have. just need the intake) and make 450hp. For a class such as a stock car or B-mod this would be a dirt cheap engine option. 





Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy