HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: Brad Doty on Posse Outlaw Crew Chiefs / Wing Angle Rule / Narrow LR Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 2 of 3   of  52 replies
fiXXXer
October 09, 2015 at 02:50:36 AM
Joined: 10/26/2014
Posts: 2482
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: buzz rightrear on October 08 2015 at 10:43:08 PM

If they figure the angle with flat tires the angle will increase when there is more air.

Running bleeders and coming in with less air in the rear would lower the wing angle.


The reason the sings are run at such an angle now is they don't work worth a shit any more because the down force has been taken out of them. Years ago when doty was running you didn't need all that wing angle because the wings were wings, not flat pieces of plywood with no down force.



Nailed it. It doesn't matter what angle you run the wings at, if they're flat, dirty air will continue to a be a huge factor in the racing. Especially on the larger tracks. I can't for the life of me figure out why in the hell they're still using them. The only time I ever heard about dirty air before the flat wings was during a NASCRAP race. Every driver or crew member I've ever talked to 100% agrees with me on this.



cubicdollars
October 09, 2015 at 05:50:46 AM
Joined: 02/27/2005
Posts: 4443
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: fiXXXer on October 09 2015 at 02:50:36 AM

Nailed it. It doesn't matter what angle you run the wings at, if they're flat, dirty air will continue to a be a huge factor in the racing. Especially on the larger tracks. I can't for the life of me figure out why in the hell they're still using them. The only time I ever heard about dirty air before the flat wings was during a NASCRAP race. Every driver or crew member I've ever talked to 100% agrees with me on this.



Dirty air is turbulence plain and simple. At the same angle a deep dish wing produces MORE drag and turbulance. Trouble is they stand the flat top wings up more to try to get max downforce since they took it away. All they need to do is force them to run a lower wing angle with the flat wing. There is a reason why every major series has aero rules. Because they are a necessity.


 

 

 

They don't even know how to spell sprint car much less chromoly...http://www.ycmco.com


MoOpenwheel
October 09, 2015 at 07:58:58 AM
Joined: 07/27/2005
Posts: 637
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: buzz rightrear on October 08 2015 at 10:43:08 PM

If they figure the angle with flat tires the angle will increase when there is more air.

Running bleeders and coming in with less air in the rear would lower the wing angle.


The reason the sings are run at such an angle now is they don't work worth a shit any more because the down force has been taken out of them. Years ago when doty was running you didn't need all that wing angle because the wings were wings, not flat pieces of plywood with no down force.



Good catch.  I was thinking backwards.  Or probably not thinking at all.  Still it wouldn't be hard to figure what the maximum could be and go from there.




blazer00
October 09, 2015 at 10:24:51 AM
Joined: 06/10/2015
Posts: 2420
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: SamHerring14 on October 08 2015 at 09:16:14 AM

The drivers are saying they need more downforce, that they can't turn behind someone. Are you not listening???  Jeff Swindell hasn't raced a 410 in 15 years. 



"Boo Hoo....my car won't stick without more downforce and I can't get by the guy in front of me".........Well I am listening and the ones whining need to be able to drive the damn car....not just steer it in a straight line! Sprint cars have already been turned into a straight line race car, why add to that? Change some things up so the cars are more drivable and we'll have better racing. And...Where did Jeff Swindell come in to this? I must have missed something. I thought the comments were from Brad Doty.



gary grimson
MyWebsite
October 09, 2015 at 03:34:53 PM
Joined: 09/13/2006
Posts: 118
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: BigRightRear on October 08 2015 at 01:02:09 PM

If wing angles are measured post race at the scales with an inclinometer...will teams have to stop using bleeders at the risk the car will settle at an illegal post race reading?



Didn't know that them big dollar teams are using bleeders in their fronts !!

I'm not sure , however you guys are the experts. If rear tires go flat, doesn't that lower wing angle ? 



gary grimson
MyWebsite
October 09, 2015 at 03:37:26 PM
Joined: 09/13/2006
Posts: 118
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: sc lm race fan on October 08 2015 at 05:21:31 PM

As I have said for years it's the side boards that are the problem and the flat wings made it worse. Why do we have 5 foot (60 inches) by 5 foot (60 inches) center foil section and 72 inch side boards. Cut a foot off make then 60 inches. Remove wicker bill. This will get rid of the left side of the wing air packing.

WoO rule 15.8 wings

15.8.1 Top Wing Center Foil A.) Center Foil maximum size of 25 square feet with a maximum width and length of 60 inches. Center Foil must be square or rectangular in shape with all 4 corners set at 90° angles with no variance allowed. Center foil top is to be flat from front to back and side to side. The center foil top must start being flat within 6” from the center foil’s front leading edge.

15.8.3 Side Board Panels TOP A.) The Top wing side board’s maximum size will be 72 inches long and 30 inches tall. The top 2/3’s of each top wing side panel shall consist of only 2 corners. Each corner shall be set at a 90° angle with no variance. This portion of the side panel’s leading edge may not be behind the center foils leading edge.

 

When the wings first started they were for forward bite not rudder effect.

Looking at the two pictures in this thread what do you see is the bigest differnce in the cars. Hint look at the left side rails. And back of the wing.



Another expert , it's 60" x 60" bud. 




SamHerring14
October 09, 2015 at 04:00:55 PM
Joined: 05/23/2014
Posts: 299
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: gary grimson on October 09 2015 at 03:37:26 PM

Another expert , it's 60" x 60" bud. 



You are on the wrong board Gary. I didnt know simple math and facts were allowed on this one.



Dryslick Willie
October 09, 2015 at 04:43:54 PM
Joined: 12/17/2009
Posts: 2246
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: SamHerring14 on October 08 2015 at 09:16:14 AM

The drivers are saying they need more downforce, that they can't turn behind someone. Are you not listening???  Jeff Swindell hasn't raced a 410 in 15 years. 



Since we're dealing with facts here Mr. Herring, I'd point out that Jeff Swindell has indeed raced a 410 in the last 15 years.   He raced the #94 either last year or in 2013 at the Knoxville 410 Nats...



Slamm1n
October 09, 2015 at 04:50:52 PM
Joined: 08/10/2010
Posts: 299
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: SamHerring14 on October 08 2015 at 09:16:14 AM

The drivers are saying they need more downforce, that they can't turn behind someone. Are you not listening???  Jeff Swindell hasn't raced a 410 in 15 years. 



Jeff Swindell hasn't raced a 410 in 15 YEARS?!?! I guess you've never heard of the Nationals?




Dryslick Willie
October 09, 2015 at 04:51:45 PM
Joined: 12/17/2009
Posts: 2246
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: cubicdollars on October 08 2015 at 03:28:21 AM

Every driver I know says the racing usually sucks until the track slows down. There has been alot of people coming from deep in the pack on the narrow right rear tire once the track slows down a couple of seconds. Track slowing down a couple of seconds is the same thing as unhooking the cars. Unhooking the cars was and is the key for both better racing and cost containment. It is time to take some of the drive out of the left rear tire and lower the wings to kill drag. To reduce engine expense and facilitate better racing when the track is wet or rough.

Dewease thinks the problem is easily solved. "The late models went through this years ago," Dewease said. "They had a big right rear and had all these wedges to put in the car, and it was too easy to go fast. We have the same problem. They went to a narrow tire and unhooked the cars and now, they have to race."

"That's what we need to do. The tires have gotten so good, that we need to go to a smaller tire."
- Lance Dewease

"I didn't see a big problem when we had to put on the 16" (wide right rear tire) for the ASCS show. I think 16" is a move in the right direction, but it plain and simply is not enough. The tire companies will probably freak out on this, but I believe we need to cut the left rear width back to around 12" to help take some of the drive out of the car. Less tire, less power needed." - Jeff Swindell



I'm not sure whether the answer is tires, wings, or anything else, but I wish something would change.   I'm headed out to Devils Bowl next weekend for the Winter Nationals.   I'll probably be in a hurry to get out there Friday night.   I'm not sure why, because I fully expect to see little or no actual racing during the heats.   Whatever order they come out of turn two on the first lap may well be the finishing order.   If I'm lucky it'll slick some for the feature and I may see some racing.   With any luck the track dries out fast on Saturday and the racing may be better or even good.   I agree completely with Cubic's first sentence here.    Fast times on the stopwatch don't necessarily translate to good racing.

 

Some will point out that this show is ASCS and not WoO.   I see very little difference having also attended the last two WoO shows at the Bowl.   The Outlaws maybe a tick faster on the stop watch, although you really can't tell it visibly, but the racing quality is about the same.    Maybe it's track configuration, maybe it's just winged racing.  But I wish it would improve.



SamHerring14
October 09, 2015 at 05:05:38 PM
Joined: 05/23/2014
Posts: 299
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Dryslick Willie on October 09 2015 at 04:43:54 PM

Since we're dealing with facts here Mr. Herring, I'd point out that Jeff Swindell has indeed raced a 410 in the last 15 years.   He raced the #94 either last year or in 2013 at the Knoxville 410 Nats...



My bad, I attended that Nationals to. Guess I missed what race he was in. Hasn't been full time or a player in 15 years. So I don't think his opinion should matter. All I know is the more people listen to this board, the worse the racing will become. You guys are all about big money teams having an advantage. Well the more rule changes will only benefit these guys! That's what you don't understand. 

never before in modern history have so many non outlaw teams won races! Greg Wilson won from 9 at Eldora on used tires, so they can't be that bad?????  Dietrech from 9 at the Grove. Blaney from 9 at Lernerville, Mc Carl from 9 ( Nats Prelim ), TK from 14 ( NSL final ) Jacob Allen from 17 or 18 to challenging for the win at Deer Creek! Should I go on???? Oh, stewart from 14 at Kings Royal. 

The only ones that will benefit from rule changes are the big teams. testing etc 



dirtybeer
October 09, 2015 at 06:04:40 PM
Joined: 11/25/2005
Posts: 558
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: SamHerring14 on October 09 2015 at 05:05:38 PM

My bad, I attended that Nationals to. Guess I missed what race he was in. Hasn't been full time or a player in 15 years. So I don't think his opinion should matter. All I know is the more people listen to this board, the worse the racing will become. You guys are all about big money teams having an advantage. Well the more rule changes will only benefit these guys! That's what you don't understand. 

never before in modern history have so many non outlaw teams won races! Greg Wilson won from 9 at Eldora on used tires, so they can't be that bad?????  Dietrech from 9 at the Grove. Blaney from 9 at Lernerville, Mc Carl from 9 ( Nats Prelim ), TK from 14 ( NSL final ) Jacob Allen from 17 or 18 to challenging for the win at Deer Creek! Should I go on???? Oh, stewart from 14 at Kings Royal. 

The only ones that will benefit from rule changes are the big teams. testing etc 



Sprint cars aren't that complex,wheel spacing and offset,stagger,shocks and bars.Any sprint car guy with a little knowledge will figure out quickly what the car wants,it aint rocket science.




SamHerring14
October 09, 2015 at 06:15:35 PM
Joined: 05/23/2014
Posts: 299
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: dirtybeer on October 09 2015 at 06:04:40 PM

Sprint cars aren't that complex,wheel spacing and offset,stagger,shocks and bars.Any sprint car guy with a little knowledge will figure out quickly what the car wants,it aint rocket science.



How come Outlaw teams have crew chiefs then?? 



blazer00
October 09, 2015 at 07:44:05 PM
Joined: 06/10/2015
Posts: 2420
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: SamHerring14 on October 09 2015 at 05:05:38 PM

My bad, I attended that Nationals to. Guess I missed what race he was in. Hasn't been full time or a player in 15 years. So I don't think his opinion should matter. All I know is the more people listen to this board, the worse the racing will become. You guys are all about big money teams having an advantage. Well the more rule changes will only benefit these guys! That's what you don't understand. 

never before in modern history have so many non outlaw teams won races! Greg Wilson won from 9 at Eldora on used tires, so they can't be that bad?????  Dietrech from 9 at the Grove. Blaney from 9 at Lernerville, Mc Carl from 9 ( Nats Prelim ), TK from 14 ( NSL final ) Jacob Allen from 17 or 18 to challenging for the win at Deer Creek! Should I go on???? Oh, stewart from 14 at Kings Royal. 

The only ones that will benefit from rule changes are the big teams. testing etc 



Horsepower costs big money so yeh, the big money teams will always have that advantage. Especially when the adjustability of the car is limited which is what the rules packages focus on today. A good team with respectable horsepower just might come up with a combination that could out race huge horsepower, given the opprtunity to make wholesale changes to the set up. But, without a more open adjustability rules package, respectable horsepower has little chance. I guess my question is this. Do we have better racing today with 900 HP than we did when we had 700HP? When we had 700HP more was allowed to be done with the car set up.



dirtybeer
October 09, 2015 at 07:46:11 PM
Joined: 11/25/2005
Posts: 558
Reply

So the driver can concentrate on driving instead of the car, but you know that.There are many sprint cars raced all over this country with just a couple of crew guys doing what the driver tells them, I would say these teams are actually the majority.With a dirt track its usually just an educated guess, and even the best crew chiefs often get it wrong, we see it all the time.




dirtybeer
October 09, 2015 at 07:54:17 PM
Joined: 11/25/2005
Posts: 558
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: blazer00 on October 09 2015 at 07:44:05 PM

Horsepower costs big money so yeh, the big money teams will always have that advantage. Especially when the adjustability of the car is limited which is what the rules packages focus on today. A good team with respectable horsepower just might come up with a combination that could out race huge horsepower, given the opprtunity to make wholesale changes to the set up. But, without a more open adjustability rules package, respectable horsepower has little chance. I guess my question is this. Do we have better racing today with 900 HP than we did when we had 700HP? When we had 700HP more was allowed to be done with the car set up.



And with the 600-700 hp motors, they didnt want the wings standing way up, they didnt have the motor to push them, it would have just slowed them down.



budz76
MyWebsite
October 10, 2015 at 08:19:25 PM
Joined: 12/03/2005
Posts: 281
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: sc lm race fan on October 08 2015 at 05:21:31 PM

As I have said for years it's the side boards that are the problem and the flat wings made it worse. Why do we have 5 foot (60 inches) by 5 foot (60 inches) center foil section and 72 inch side boards. Cut a foot off make then 60 inches. Remove wicker bill. This will get rid of the left side of the wing air packing.

WoO rule 15.8 wings

15.8.1 Top Wing Center Foil A.) Center Foil maximum size of 25 square feet with a maximum width and length of 60 inches. Center Foil must be square or rectangular in shape with all 4 corners set at 90° angles with no variance allowed. Center foil top is to be flat from front to back and side to side. The center foil top must start being flat within 6” from the center foil’s front leading edge.

15.8.3 Side Board Panels TOP A.) The Top wing side board’s maximum size will be 72 inches long and 30 inches tall. The top 2/3’s of each top wing side panel shall consist of only 2 corners. Each corner shall be set at a 90° angle with no variance. This portion of the side panel’s leading edge may not be behind the center foils leading edge.

 

When the wings first started they were for forward bite not rudder effect.

Looking at the two pictures in this thread what do you see is the bigest differnce in the cars. Hint look at the left side rails. And back of the wing.



+1

reduce both wings and sideboards by 10%. 

harder tires and reduce the max height and width of both rear tires.

make the driver more important AND reduce the advantage of more HP.



SamHerring14
October 10, 2015 at 10:49:48 PM
Joined: 05/23/2014
Posts: 299
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: budz76 on October 10 2015 at 08:19:25 PM

+1

reduce both wings and sideboards by 10%. 

harder tires and reduce the max height and width of both rear tires.

make the driver more important AND reduce the advantage of more HP.



Go back to dished wings and 18" RR tire and all problems will

be solved 




buzz rightrear
October 11, 2015 at 01:31:52 AM
Joined: 09/12/2008
Posts: 2511
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: cubicdollars on October 09 2015 at 01:57:11 AM

Measuring wing angle on a sprint car is simple. Other racing series have a lot of aero rules: bodies, spoilers, wings, winglets, underwings, diffusers, etc. Sprint car wing angle is easily and quickly measured with a digital level when it crosses the scales. Lowering it would save thousands of dollars a year in engine expense.



You are assuming the scales and the area in the pits where the team works on the car are both exactly level? Or the car sits at the same angle at both?

What if the team makes an adjustment to the rear of the car or front of the car during a red and it changes the angle of the car, including the wing?

You do know wings change angle when they move back and forth don't you? So just where exactly along the wing travel are you going to check the angle. So a driver could have the wing back and be at more angle and just roll it all the way forward coming off the track and by the time they hit the scales it is down.

Cars raise in the back as fuel burns off. That can change the wing angle.

You see, things are not so simple.

 

 

 

 

 


to indy and beyond!!

Beer Time
October 11, 2015 at 03:44:38 PM
Joined: 01/01/2014
Posts: 64
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: paydirt28 on October 08 2015 at 10:36:50 AM

+1



+2





Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy