HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: Should Weight Limit be Increased? Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 2 of 2   of  36 replies
Murphy
November 29, 2016 at 09:35:02 PM
Joined: 05/26/2005
Posts: 3292
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: staggerman on November 29 2016 at 07:29:48 AM

Currently building up a new car for 2017 and the one thing I have realized is trying to meet the current weight rules costs a lot of money. Buying lightweight bolts, titanium everything, lightweight rearends, etc as most of the lightweight parts come at a 50-100% increase in cost per part. It got me thinking how much money could be saved if the 410 or 360 weight rules were upped to 1500 or 1600 pounds? What do you think? Would increasing the weight rule be a way to save teams money? Just a thought.



     If you had 2 cars that both weighed 1500 or 1600 pounds and one had titanium bolts and lightweight parts in the moving parts of the engine, drive-line and suspension, would that driver have an advantage over you with your standard weight parts?



Sniper83
November 29, 2016 at 09:49:16 PM
Joined: 01/13/2016
Posts: 36
Reply
This message was edited on November 29, 2016 at 09:50:34 PM by Sniper83
Reply to:
Posted By: skuebird on November 29 2016 at 07:37:30 PM

If you are referring to Donny Schatz personal weight you haven't seen him lately .  pretty sure he's in better shape than you.



Wow, somebody's a little sensitive. He is referring to the car as it comes across the scales. Schatz has been known to have a heavier car than everybody else. Like somebody else mentioned they have witnessed his car roll across the scales at 1550. I'm surprised not a lot of people have caught on to this. You ever notice Schatz doesn't usually time in very well but once the track slicks off he is a rocket? Heavier car equals more grip when the track slicks off. Pretty simple concept and they have perfected it over the years. 



minthess
MyWebsite
November 30, 2016 at 08:31:20 AM
Joined: 12/09/2008
Posts: 2403
Reply

There is already a professional dirt division with a much higher weight.  Its called super late model.  They are allowed an engine that can tow it around and still be exciting as well.  Please stop watering down our once far superior sport.  Late models are going to be faster that a sprint car if we keep deballing.  If there weren't umpteen other hobby open wheel classes, it would make sense.  There are more than enough cheaper choices to go around. The NFL mandating chicks would make more sense than making a 410 available for an hourly blue collar worker.


Luna's Ford engine style that won 2 WoO titles and 3 
Kings Royals before a weight rule against the best EVER
in their prime and now DOMINATES super dirt late model
racing is no longer allowed/wanted in a WoO sprint
car.... Was Luna a miracle worker?


motorhead748
November 30, 2016 at 08:49:40 AM
Joined: 08/05/2010
Posts: 598
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Sniper83 on November 29 2016 at 09:49:16 PM

Wow, somebody's a little sensitive. He is referring to the car as it comes across the scales. Schatz has been known to have a heavier car than everybody else. Like somebody else mentioned they have witnessed his car roll across the scales at 1550. I'm surprised not a lot of people have caught on to this. You ever notice Schatz doesn't usually time in very well but once the track slicks off he is a rocket? Heavier car equals more grip when the track slicks off. Pretty simple concept and they have perfected it over the years. 



I once saw a famous Indiana driver in a mishap at one of the Indiana bullrings and got the rear bumper knocked off among other things. On the ensuing yellow another car came by and ran over that bumper and flipped. When they went out to get the offending bumper off the track they could hardly lift it.....it was solid steel instead of tubing



vande77
November 30, 2016 at 09:22:27 AM
Joined: 01/20/2005
Posts: 2079
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: skuebird on November 29 2016 at 07:37:30 PM

If you are referring to Donny Schatz personal weight you haven't seen him lately .  pretty sure he's in better shape than you.



I was not.  I believe their car without the driver may make it across the scale and not be DQ'd.   IMO - that is their secret that no one else has caught onto yet.  The car actually weighing more HELPS them when the track becomes super slick.  Having a Super Light car only helps when the track is at optimum conditions (time trials).



MoOpenwheel
November 30, 2016 at 10:15:18 AM
Joined: 07/27/2005
Posts: 638
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: vande77 on November 30 2016 at 09:22:27 AM

I was not.  I believe their car without the driver may make it across the scale and not be DQ'd.   IMO - that is their secret that no one else has caught onto yet.  The car actually weighing more HELPS them when the track becomes super slick.  Having a Super Light car only helps when the track is at optimum conditions (time trials).



So you think Sammy has never caught on to your weight theory?  He has always, always had the lightest car possible.  He's lost races due to running out of fuel because he didn't want to have the extra weight.  Sammy has always been thought as one of the very best minds when it comes to making a race car work.  I don't think I've ever seen him bolt weight on when the track gets slick.  He won lots and lots of races back in the day.  Same for Wolfie.  But you could be right.  The 15 team could be the only one to ever figure out that more weight is better.  If so I'm even more confused.  Donnie looks smaller to me now than he did a few years ago.  It appears he lost some weight.  It's not real easy for most people to do that.  Why would he put himself thru that if more weight actually helped him in the car?




vande77
November 30, 2016 at 10:46:34 AM
Joined: 01/20/2005
Posts: 2079
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: MoOpenwheel on November 30 2016 at 10:15:18 AM

So you think Sammy has never caught on to your weight theory?  He has always, always had the lightest car possible.  He's lost races due to running out of fuel because he didn't want to have the extra weight.  Sammy has always been thought as one of the very best minds when it comes to making a race car work.  I don't think I've ever seen him bolt weight on when the track gets slick.  He won lots and lots of races back in the day.  Same for Wolfie.  But you could be right.  The 15 team could be the only one to ever figure out that more weight is better.  If so I'm even more confused.  Donnie looks smaller to me now than he did a few years ago.  It appears he lost some weight.  It's not real easy for most people to do that.  Why would he put himself thru that if more weight actually helped him in the car?



I think it's about Where the weight is located more than just the weight itself.  Weight in some areas may help the cars performance and handling and weight in other areas may hurt it.

Steve Kinser said that sometimes his weight helped him and sometimes it hurt him (depending on track conditions) the last few years he raced full-time.

If you pay attention when a team does bolt on weight, they are very precise with where they locate it, if only having the weight mattered they wouldn't care where it went.  For Example, having a lightwight Block on the Engine may not be as ideal as many beleive since it seems a lot of teams almost always bolt the weight in that vicinity.

As for Donny, he's no longer a spring chicken (age) and he's getting in better shape.  Can't fault a guy for that.  Does it help him in the car?  probably.  My guess is that was not the main motiviation for it though.



BMcLain21
MyWebsite
November 30, 2016 at 08:06:22 PM
Joined: 04/14/2007
Posts: 564
Reply

This 285 pound guy would absolutely love an increase in weight!  I have a ton of lightweight parts on my car and I still roll across the scale at 1725 in a 360!


Brandon McLain
United Sprint Car Series Driver
2014 Season
National Rookie of the Year!
National Points - 8th
Southern Points - 3rd
Asphalt Points - 3rd
18 Races, 3 Top 5's, 14 Top 10's

reklaw944
December 01, 2016 at 08:44:34 AM
Joined: 11/02/2015
Posts: 60
Reply

Our last 410 was a J&J with no titanium on it other than valves, and with a 140 pound driver we would scale at around 1440-1450 after the feature with 5-8 gallons of fuel in the tank. We could have gotten close to the weight rule but like everyone knows, it would have cost a serious amount of money. Tim Shaffer once told me that the biggest difference he noticed the first time he got to drive a lightweight car was how much quicker it reacted to everything from throttle, brakes, and driver input than a car built with steel/aluminum parts does. Changing the weight rule won't affect the high dollar teams all that much financially, as they buy everythin gnew from year to year anyway. It will hurt the smaller teams who maybe use parts a little longer and now have to go buy replacements if some of their parts are outlawed. 




vkracer51
December 02, 2016 at 11:56:26 AM
Joined: 09/17/2012
Posts: 63
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: brettco on November 29 2016 at 05:14:14 PM

  Its easier to accelerate less weight than more on the same contact patches. I thought only stockcar guys added weight for the slick.



"stock car guys" dont all add weight for the slick. From a Modified stand point not one of us at 95% of the races we ran added weight when the track slicked off. We adjust our birdcages index by moving the points at which is bar is bolted to the chassis to create more drive. Increasing weight is more a myth with todays suspensions. The adding weight guys are still using the same idea that was used when leafsprings were more common. 

 

I'm not saying we didn't move the weight to different spots but normally weight was not added.



Hannity
December 02, 2016 at 12:36:40 PM
Joined: 09/18/2009
Posts: 536
Reply

I find it interesting that some think a heavier car equals more grip.

Adding weight to a vehicle may add some grip when the vehicle is in a static (lacking in movement) state, but on the race track, race cars are anything but static.

Heavier cars roll more. When they roll, they transfer more weight. When they transfer more weight, its harder to keep the rear tires equally loaded. Maximum traction is achieved when both rear tires are equally loaded (or close to equally loaded).

Building the car as light as possible and keeping the weight as low as possible is advantagous. 



linbob
December 02, 2016 at 12:59:45 PM
Joined: 03/12/2011
Posts: 1652
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Oppermanfan on November 29 2016 at 10:02:39 AM

And another thing to keep in mind is these suppliers aren't going to just take it in the shorts cuz people aren't buying titanium anymore. They are going to increase the cost of steel parts to make more money on them. They recognize that if the race teams will pay X amount for lightweight parts, they have the money to pay to steel parts. I don't know there would be alot of savings, just cost shifting. 



I do not agree with you.  There  is competition with several manufactures.  The steel parts will remain about the same as today.  You have to remember to raise weight limit say 25 lb will mean more cars as  they set today will be closer to min, weight.  Most are over the weight limit now, even with Tit. parts.  If you do not have a 140 lb driver you are probably over weight.




vkracer51
December 02, 2016 at 03:25:44 PM
Joined: 09/17/2012
Posts: 63
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Hannity on December 02 2016 at 12:36:40 PM

I find it interesting that some think a heavier car equals more grip.

Adding weight to a vehicle may add some grip when the vehicle is in a static (lacking in movement) state, but on the race track, race cars are anything but static.

Heavier cars roll more. When they roll, they transfer more weight. When they transfer more weight, its harder to keep the rear tires equally loaded. Maximum traction is achieved when both rear tires are equally loaded (or close to equally loaded).

Building the car as light as possible and keeping the weight as low as possible is advantagous. 



This is not 100% true either. Maximum forward traction is achieved when both tires are equally loaded, but on a circle track car that is not the goal. Otherwise there would be no reason for guys to laser out a car to get exact roll centers where they want them. If you watch any race Donny tends to beat the guys in the corners. I guarantee his car is not equally loaded on both tires in the corner because you don't want them to be that creates a very tight car because it wants to go straight not turn. Most people don't realize that because they are thinking a general terms not from a true driving term. 

 

If you want to beat DS you have to get a car that will beat people in the center of the corner. Sometimes a driver can make up for a car that is setup a different way, but a car that can beat anyone in the corners like DS does will be the most consistant and more than likely win much more often. He doesn't have the best straightline speeds most nights he has the best average speed all the way around the track but especially in the corners. 



blazer00
December 03, 2016 at 09:09:48 AM
Joined: 06/10/2015
Posts: 2420
Reply

You are correct according to one of the greatest of all time! Wolfgang once shared with me many years ago that being the fastest car down the straights was of very little intrest to him........but, being able to carry that momentum through the center of the corners and off made the car appear to be the fastest on the straights. In reality, it was how the car drove through the corners that enabled him to overtake and pass cars anywhere on the track....corners and straights. Passing faster cars wasn't necessarily that big of a problem if the car he was in was set up properly. And too, of course, he knew how to wheel the damn things!



cubicdollars
December 03, 2016 at 11:29:37 AM
Joined: 02/27/2005
Posts: 4443
Reply

Should Weight Limit be Increased? Yes. For more safety advances.


 

 

 

They don't even know how to spell sprint car much less chromoly...http://www.ycmco.com



91RI
December 04, 2016 at 12:30:11 PM
Joined: 03/01/2005
Posts: 277
Reply

What safety advancements would these be?  4 door bars?  Roofs?  Hey lets make them so heavy they can never flip.  Oh wait, fenders, we need fenders.  Shit we've gone this far,  lets add a starter.  Look,  it's a late model.   

 

Have you ever seen a 1700 lb sprint car crash?  The extra weight tears the hell out of the frame, and I believe it makes them less safe.  I guess we could build the frame out of 0.120 wall tubing.

Ok,  I'm going fishing now.



Pushtruck II
MyWebsite
December 05, 2016 at 08:19:55 PM
Joined: 06/05/2016
Posts: 18
Reply

What is the weight of a Silver Crown car with a full fuel load on the first lap? What wall thickness frame tubing do they use? 

Just asking. Existing 410 and 360 weigh limits are Ok as they are.





Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy