HoseHeads.com | HoseHeads Classifieds | Racer's Auction
Home | Register | Contact | Verify Email | FAQ |
Blogs | Photo Gallery | Press Release | Results | HoseheadsClassifieds.com


Welcome Guest. Already registered? Please Login

 

Forum: HoseHeads Sprint Car General Forum (go)
Moderators: dirtonly  /  dmantx  /  hosehead


Records per page
 
Topic: Saldana/Schatz Most Lethal Back-to-Back Rookies in WoO History Email this topic to a friend | Subscribe to this TopicReport this Topic to Moderator
Page 1 of 1   of  4 replies
texdel
November 01, 2018 at 10:38:48 AM
Joined: 05/29/2007
Posts: 326
Reply

Joey Saldana and Donny Schatz are the most lethal back-to-back Rookies of the Year in WoO history.

With a current combined win total (Saldana 105 and Schatz 282) of 387 victories, those lucky enough to watch these two drivers

will surely appreciate it later in life.

Obviously the Big 3 were all rookies in 1978, but that is a different thread.

These drivers are historical figures and glad to witness some of their greatness.

 

 

 

 




Murphy
November 01, 2018 at 04:37:18 PM
Joined: 05/26/2005
Posts: 3261
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: texdel on November 01 2018 at 10:38:48 AM

Joey Saldana and Donny Schatz are the most lethal back-to-back Rookies of the Year in WoO history.

With a current combined win total (Saldana 105 and Schatz 282) of 387 victories, those lucky enough to watch these two drivers

will surely appreciate it later in life.

Obviously the Big 3 were all rookies in 1978, but that is a different thread.

These drivers are historical figures and glad to witness some of their greatness.

 

 

 

 



    Interesting thought, but wouldn't the combined total of Steve Kinser and whoever came right after him have more WoO wins? wink (I know.)

      Anyone else wonder why there was no WoO rookie of the year named some years? Wouldn't it be based on the highest points finish of that year's rookies, or is there more criteria involved?



linbob
November 01, 2018 at 05:40:17 PM
Joined: 03/12/2011
Posts: 1649
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Murphy on November 01 2018 at 04:37:18 PM

    Interesting thought, but wouldn't the combined total of Steve Kinser and whoever came right after him have more WoO wins? wink (I know.)

      Anyone else wonder why there was no WoO rookie of the year named some years? Wouldn't it be based on the highest points finish of that year's rookies, or is there more criteria involved?



maybe no rookies those years.  WOO only has 1 rookie this year (Ion Madson), so he will win it.




bighess11
November 02, 2018 at 01:56:33 AM
Joined: 07/01/2013
Posts: 131
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: Murphy on November 01 2018 at 04:37:18 PM

    Interesting thought, but wouldn't the combined total of Steve Kinser and whoever came right after him have more WoO wins? wink (I know.)

      Anyone else wonder why there was no WoO rookie of the year named some years? Wouldn't it be based on the highest points finish of that year's rookies, or is there more criteria involved?



If Steve had won rookie of the year then you’d be right. 


-

Murphy
November 02, 2018 at 07:14:16 AM
Joined: 05/26/2005
Posts: 3261
Reply
Reply to:
Posted By: bighess11 on November 02 2018 at 01:56:33 AM

If Steve had won rookie of the year then you’d be right. 



wink I know. Steve never won rookie of the year. In spite of that, I think he did OK. Sammy and Doug nevefr won rookie of the year either.





Post Reply
You must be logged in to Post a Message.
Not a member register Here.
Already registered? Please Login





If you have a website and would like to set up a forum here at HoseHeadForums.com
please contact us by using the contact link at the top of the page.

© 2024 HoseHeadForums.com Privacy Policy